Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: UPDATE: Very Bad Development In Hillary's Email Investigation: She Knew It Was A Security Risk [View all]DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)63. Please see Post 24
Thank you in advance.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
237 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
UPDATE: Very Bad Development In Hillary's Email Investigation: She Knew It Was A Security Risk [View all]
berni_mccoy
Mar 2016
OP
Your desire for this to destroy her political career will not happen. She is
Jackie Wilson Said
Mar 2016
#1
Jackie you act like this is nothing. So what if...what if your loving relative let's say
bkkyosemite
Mar 2016
#9
Nobody is destroying Hillary's political career except Hillary...She demonstrates poor judgement
AzDar
Mar 2016
#52
Your desire to have her for POTUS is making you accept unethical or possibly criminal behavior.
thereismore
Mar 2016
#140
I know. It is like a hungry pack of animals circling. It is not becoming. Nt
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#213
Alternatively, give the Republicans most of what they really want, and they'll make decent partners
Babel_17
Mar 2016
#62
Like entitlement , embellishing and detracting from the Truth to win at any cost ?
orpupilofnature57
Mar 2016
#54
She wanted those emails on her private server so Billy boy could see them too...
bkkyosemite
Mar 2016
#4
The private takeover of a government apparatus. I'm sure there's a word for that...
arcane1
Mar 2016
#227
Ugly. The people reject your candidate, so now you're laying your hopes on a right-wing witch hunt.
DanTex
Mar 2016
#6
Why would you celebrate the fact that some folks were arbitrarily punished/silenced?
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2016
#91
So the jury system is broke if Hillary fans get banned??? I get it. Skinner just happens.....
Logical
Mar 2016
#94
it's a hunt for the truth; our politicians should be truthful; should not matter who seeks the truth
amborin
Mar 2016
#13
Just the majority of us, hopefully you'll be able to hear and appreciate the silence
synergie
Mar 2016
#96
Are you claiming these organizations are right wing partisan "witch-hunters? 3 choices-yes-no-evade
Dragonfli
Mar 2016
#34
I think he's claiming that the lies told about these investigations are very much being
synergie
Mar 2016
#102
No, I know I can because I don't read partisan sources (why do you and what are they saying?)
Dragonfli
Mar 2016
#147
Everything is! Except if it comes from a David Brock Website, How often Must ve be told?
Dragonfli
Mar 2016
#224
I see so many outdated talking points on this thread. Where have they been the last couple months?
leveymg
Mar 2016
#124
That's what makes me so angry. Apparently being a celebrity means the rules no longer apply to you.
Kentonio
Mar 2016
#191
LOL, the Indictment Fairy will save the day for Bernie, just clap louder! nt
geek tragedy
Mar 2016
#10
Maybe they should write out indictments and put them under their pillows when they go to sleep.
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2016
#36
FBI is not investigating Clinton. RW are. Meh.... oh. And Sanders supporters. Hoping.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#20
Are you claiming these organizations are right wing partisan "witch-hunters? 3 choices-yes-no-evade
Dragonfli
Mar 2016
#37
You "take it" wrong. The FBI is not investigating Clinton or the other four. The system.
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#39
Who is responsible for the choice of the system poorly chosen? I also believe you have no basis
Dragonfli
Mar 2016
#44
FBI said they were not investigating Clinton or the other four SOS that practiced email the same way
seabeyond
Mar 2016
#45
She was involved with practices regarding her server than none of the others had.
Dragonfli
Mar 2016
#60
I only have to read the news, you can be as well informed yourself without any special help.
Dragonfli
Mar 2016
#50
Yes, but to be well informed, you need to have the ability to distinguish between
synergie
Mar 2016
#99
On the emails? The place that had to walk back its stories on the subject due to
synergie
Mar 2016
#145
She isn't going to be indicted and we the voters have found the Vermont independent wanting...
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2016
#30
She will end the primary season with an overwhelming popular vote and pledged delegate lead.
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2016
#138
I believe it's a violation of DU rules to suggest another poster is a troll...
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2016
#75
Were you doing that for your own edification when you suggested I was a troll?
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2016
#86
And maybe competence was referred to, as well as trusting people to stick to regulations
Babel_17
Mar 2016
#70
I actually sort of remember Karl Rove being involved in keeping Blackberry around
Babel_17
Mar 2016
#110
Unfortunately he is completely wrong-headed on govt. policy for strong encryption.
JonLeibowitz
Mar 2016
#182
heck, I wouldn't object to them cutting a deal and allowing Martin O'Malley to..
grasswire
Mar 2016
#121
Very interesting. How many Hillary supporters have referred to her as a prophet, or Gandhi?
Amimnoch
Mar 2016
#220
Yes you have to believe in a fairy because Clinton is above the Law right?
silenttigersong
Mar 2016
#136
I think the Secretary of State and former SOSs shouldn't have had private email servers
Rosa Luxemburg
Mar 2016
#152
Hillary Clinton will still win the Democratic nomination and be elected President.
George II
Mar 2016
#190
And a few more pro-Bernie OPs gets pushed a little deeper down the GDP stack.
JoePhilly
Mar 2016
#197
You should write an OP on this. Definitely dangerous handling of State Information
berni_mccoy
Mar 2016
#215
Actually the voters do. And if FBI recommends indictment and no charges come out of DoJ
berni_mccoy
Mar 2016
#214