2016 Postmortem

mhatrw

(10,786 posts)

90. Wow. Even THEIR FUCKING CHARTS LIE!!!

Reply to kristopher (Original post)

Thu Feb 18, 2016, 05:34 PM

Feb 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

92 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton ethics claim another victim as Rachel Maddow plays chart game [View all] kristopher Feb 2016 OP

Is the second chart noamnety Feb 2016 #1

That is what my 2 bullet points at the end addresses. kristopher Feb 2016 #3

I must admit, I watched the show and didn't pick up on the timeline rufus dog Feb 2016 #16

I think you are misrepresenting this badly. noamnety Feb 2016 #51

Given that a year ago, Sanders only had something like 4% planning to vote for him nationally, Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2016 #53

That's why I added text addressed to you below the charts kristopher Feb 2016 #73

That doesn't change that the text ABOVE the 2nd chart is a lie. noamnety Feb 2016 #74

It isn't a lie as it is noted as being different in the remarks. kristopher Feb 2016 #75

No, it is NOT noted as being different. noamnety Feb 2016 #79

Well, I guess I just assumed that people would be smart enough to relate the remarks to the charts. kristopher Feb 2016 #81

The personal attacks aren't necessary. (nt) noamnety Feb 2016 #82

Neither is the deliberate obtuseness. kristopher Feb 2016 #87

RM is in the bag for Hillary and has been for some time. Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #13

You obviously don't watch her show on a regular basis. If you had you would know that she's as far politicaljunkie41910 Feb 2016 #66

Bullpucky - it is a consistent unmistakable pattern kristopher Feb 2016 #68

I havne't seen it. I used to watch her show Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #69

I think the top chart is who people *expect* to win, according to NBC/SurveyMonkey, thesquanderer Feb 2016 #31

I think it's just to show that Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2016 #55

Under the bus she goes. randys1 Feb 2016 #2

So you approve of her recent hyper-partisan reporting? kristopher Feb 2016 #4

At least giver her some overalls to wear, wouldnt want to mess up her nice clothes. randys1 Feb 2016 #5

First... Kittycat Feb 2016 #15

Kind of sad that any type of disagreement.... daleanime Feb 2016 #10

NO! UNDADABUS!!!! jberryhill Feb 2016 #12

Ha! SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #19

That same old "under the bus" line is infantile and so over used CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #17

Ouch! SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #20

If they are really in the tank, then they should be undadabus, unless they jump the shark jberryhill Feb 2016 #22

Now that is what I call a smackdown! nadinbrzezinski Feb 2016 #39

You are dead to Bernie fans Rachel workinclasszero Feb 2016 #42

Not to this one, but I get your point randys1 Feb 2016 #47

to be fair to rachel questionseverything Feb 2016 #6

I don't think so. She is doing this with exceptional enthusiasm. kristopher Feb 2016 #8

they do ask the question in polls about who do you think the dem nominee will be questionseverything Feb 2016 #11

Do me a favor then - would you mind finding the question and posting it here kristopher Feb 2016 #14

sorry i had life stuff questionseverything Feb 2016 #43

Abby Martin has been my preference over Rachel for quite some time. truedelphi Feb 2016 #32

but that's the point, isn't it ellennelle Feb 2016 #38

i agree with everything you say questionseverything Feb 2016 #46

Maddow is establishment! Big Banks! Wall Street! nt LexVegas Feb 2016 #7

How does your snarky post chervilant Feb 2016 #24

I understand now why she survived the culling. NorthCarolina Feb 2016 #9

..+1 840high Feb 2016 #18

I did hear her say FlaGranny Feb 2016 #33

how did you miss ed schultz? ellennelle Feb 2016 #40

Sorry, I don't FlaGranny Feb 2016 #91

the Clinton Party makes good people do bad things MisterP Feb 2016 #21

it could mean mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #23

"Who do you think will win?" = only relevant in a casino. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2016 #25

she has caved to the right wing CEO who took over & scrapped lots of shows amborin Feb 2016 #26

Add Maddow's Voter Turnout Piece to the Exhibit. Billsmile Feb 2016 #27

Thanks for that link. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2016 #56

I used to think Rachel was one of the best, At least we still have Amy Goodman and Anna Kasparian. jalan48 Feb 2016 #28

Rachel has become quite Clitonian. n/t Skwmom Feb 2016 #29

Clinton ethics? Aren't you cute..... Beacool Feb 2016 #30

Yep monicaangela Feb 2016 #34

GE no longer owns MSNBC. It's now owned by Comcast, which is probably worse. Fawke Em Feb 2016 #49

My mistake.. monicaangela Feb 2016 #85

I think the entire news media is under orders to oppose Bernie Sanders. Zen Democrat Feb 2016 #35

this right here ^^^^^^^^^ nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #65

she has become rather a disappointment, but I knew from her bbgrunt Feb 2016 #36

Funny you should be demanding ethics, considering your 2 charts measure different things. SunSeeker Feb 2016 #37

please reread ellennelle Feb 2016 #44

sorry; addendum ellennelle Feb 2016 #45

The two charts measure entirely different things. noamnety Feb 2016 #57

Did you read the remarks? kristopher Feb 2016 #60

Yes, several times. (nt) noamnety Feb 2016 #63

Then what are you bitching about? kristopher Feb 2016 #64

Did you want to rephrase that in a less sexist way? noamnety Feb 2016 #67

Trying to deflect the topic when your rhetoric is challenged? kristopher Feb 2016 #70

I agree. The OP is much ado nothing expect opportunity to once again hit on Hillary. riversedge Feb 2016 #84

Inevitably a corporate media will serve its corporate masters... sahel Feb 2016 #41

Let me guess. moondust Feb 2016 #48

I used to enjoy her show iwannaknow Feb 2016 #50

"They" have decided Hillary will be the Democratic candidate, now just jump on their corrupt Todays_Illusion Feb 2016 #52

you post a blatant falsehood and lecture others about ethics while doing so dsc Feb 2016 #54

Thank you for your opinion. kristopher Feb 2016 #62

You are comparing two totally different things. From different sources too. Lucinda Feb 2016 #58

Yes, that is what I wrote. kristopher Feb 2016 #61

I'm beginning to see, why Randi Rhodes felt the way she did about Maddow and Franken. nt Snotcicles Feb 2016 #59

Rachel is in the bag for Clinton. Bernblu Feb 2016 #71

I stopped watching her in 2012 when she put her personal friendship CharlotteVale Feb 2016 #72

I interpreted the top chart totally differently. Vinca Feb 2016 #76

Even under that assumption, the top chart makes no sense if it the narrative is Erich Bloodaxe BSN Feb 2016 #77

I don't see her being too overt... Mike Nelson Feb 2016 #78

She isn't overt. kristopher Feb 2016 #80

Interesting article and worth reading... Mike Nelson Feb 2016 #88

RE Trump kristopher Feb 2016 #89

K and R. nt mariawr Feb 2016 #83

Gonna need a bigger bus. JTFrog Feb 2016 #86

Wow. Even THEIR FUCKING CHARTS LIE!!! mhatrw Feb 2016 #90

kick kristopher Feb 2016 #92