Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,995 posts)
45. Robert Reich specifically advised him to sign NAFTA.
Tue Feb 9, 2016, 02:04 PM
Feb 2016

But it counted when he became elected president. You had given him some advice during the campaign, correct?
Yes. I certainly was one among many people who provided him a lot of free advice. The poor man had read every one of my books.

SNIP

Well, personally, I was and still am a free trader. I think that free trade is inevitable and overall it helps everyone. But labor was very against NAFTA. And I remember appearing on so many stages in front of various labor groups and being booed off the stage because I was representing the president, and the president was committed to NAFTA. He was committed to NAFTA in the campaign. He said, during the 1992 campaign, "I am going to sign the North American Free Trade Act."

What was your advice to him during the debate though?
My advice to him during the campaign was to sign it.


And then later, once, Kirkland was telling you guys that it was going to be a "f-ing disaster," and you were going to come to regret it. You passed that on to the president. What was his reaction?
He shrugged. He was willing to take on organized labor over the North American Free Trade Act. I think the real issue there was what kind of priority NAFTA should get. Should it be one of the highest priorities of the administration in those first years? Should he spend a lot of political capital on it? Should he delay health care in order to get NAFTA done first? And the first lady wanted health care first. She didn't want him to expend political capital on NAFTA. She was concerned, and in retrospect she was absolutely right, that if health care came after NAFTA, then health care might never get done. Already the momentum was building for some sort of universal health care. He had the political capital to get that done, but the business community was telling him NAFTA was more important. And Lloyd Bentsen, the most senior member of the cabinet, and a man of great insight and wisdom and experience to whom the president deferred quite a bit, Lloyd Bentsen was adamant. NAFTA must come first. In fact, I remember Lloyd banging his finger on the table, "We must get this done right away." And so the president decided that that was going to get the priority. My job was to deliver the news to organized labor. And that was not pleasant, but they knew it was coming.

Paging Michael Moore. Perhaps he can tutor her in her vapid lack of comprehension. libdem4life Feb 2016 #1
Or true compassion. eom Sophiegirl Feb 2016 #29
It sure isn't her promotion of worldwide fracking or her cosy inbred corporate oil relationships! TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #49
thanks for pointing out the fracking questionseverything Feb 2016 #63
The Clinton's think the entire nation has amnesia. SamKnause Feb 2016 #2
The air is very thin Plucketeer Feb 2016 #14
They would be right a lot of the time. Fuddnik Feb 2016 #21
Wow... How Out Of Touch Is THAT ??? WillyT Feb 2016 #3
Amazing to me that people buy that rhetoric. EndElectoral Feb 2016 #5
the word is destroyed and it was because of Clinton trade agreements SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #4
Yep. RiverLover Feb 2016 #8
Don't you love how they come up with such innocent sounding names... malokvale77 Feb 2016 #34
I want to sit her down, bvf Feb 2016 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author Beaverhausen Feb 2016 #10
Deindustrialized...........another new mechanical talking point democrank Feb 2016 #7
It's an old term....But she's just discovered it and thinks it sounds "progressive": or something Armstead Feb 2016 #9
She should use NAFTAized. Fuddnik Feb 2016 #22
Good one! eom Duval Feb 2016 #24
And she should have included "deregulated" in the mix n/t Oilwellian Feb 2016 #32
How about JackInGreen Feb 2016 #40
Made me chuckle Fairgo Feb 2016 #56
When your child crashes the car Geronimoe Feb 2016 #11
and the hits keep on coming... dorkzilla Feb 2016 #12
Such a neutral, sanitized term Ino Feb 2016 #13
Hillary is the foe of workers and the middle class amborin Feb 2016 #15
Years ago when we IT people were watching our company's IT jobs go to India and then valerief Feb 2016 #16
+1 dreamnightwind Feb 2016 #68
Referring to NAFTA as "deindustrialized" like divorce is 'decoupling'. Now I want her medical ViseGrip Feb 2016 #17
Mini strokes add up. Divernan Feb 2016 #36
Flint's water can make one ill Plucketeer Feb 2016 #18
+1,000,000 Fuddnik Feb 2016 #23
people living in cars outside the gated communities olddots Feb 2016 #19
Anyone shocked by this? Out of touch, among other things. SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #20
NAFTA took all the effing jobs away to begin with, but lets not mention that.... onecaliberal Feb 2016 #25
Clintons turned their backs on the entire Rust Belt States FreakinDJ Feb 2016 #26
Robert Reich, Bernie Sanders supporters' hero, had much more to do with NAFTA than Hillary Clinton pnwmom Feb 2016 #27
Really? Hmm-- that goes against common knowledge Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #35
Hah! He's trying to cover his tracks now -- but he had a very different spin in 2000. pnwmom Feb 2016 #41
thanks... definitely he's nuanced it. At the same time, he may have realized Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #54
Hillary voted against CAFTA and she has also announced her opposition to the TPP. pnwmom Feb 2016 #55
From what position was she hoping to vote for it? malokvale77 Feb 2016 #57
Sorry. I mean, "support it." pnwmom Feb 2016 #61
I hope she sticks to that! Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #66
Me, too. n/t pnwmom Feb 2016 #67
It's not about trrade agreements genericaly Armstead Feb 2016 #39
Robert Reich specifically advised him to sign NAFTA. pnwmom Feb 2016 #45
You assume everyone has to be monolithic Armstead Feb 2016 #47
No, I don't. I'm saying that Robert Reich had a great deal more to do with promoting NAFTA pnwmom Feb 2016 #48
She has been on again off again and spinning over these things for years Armstead Feb 2016 #50
And I'll go with Paul Krugman's over Robert Reich's any day. n/t pnwmom Feb 2016 #51
I agree, Armstead navarth Feb 2016 #28
Sure hope she paid some good money to Flint for her visit PatrynXX Feb 2016 #30
She is also the one who wanted the debate there. Motown_Johnny Feb 2016 #31
yeah, I was thinking the other day that the ultimate cause of what happened to Flint Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #33
You know that kacekwl Feb 2016 #37
Tone deaf. blackspade Feb 2016 #38
K&R cprise Feb 2016 #42
It started under Reagan... Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #43
I know a lot of bad started under Reagan but I don't remember this being a prime feature of the 80's Bread and Circus Feb 2016 #44
You didn't see "Capitalism - A Love Story"? Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #46
It was a trend -- Just seldom mentioned by politicians or media Armstead Feb 2016 #53
The trade deals of the 90s made it far, far worse. reformist2 Feb 2016 #59
They STILL claim NAFTA was a good deal for American jobs. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2016 #60
And Arkansas HassleCat Feb 2016 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author moondust Feb 2016 #58
Just heard Clinton say that in essence every class society is a dictatorship Wig Master Feb 2016 #62
This message was self-deleted by its author Wig Master Feb 2016 #64
NAFTAfied! Ivan Kaputski Feb 2016 #65
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton just had the nerv...»Reply #45