Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
57. Yes, but that "goal" is health insurance for all that does not (directly) advance the notion
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 01:57 AM
Feb 2016

that health CARE is a right.

And that is a very important distinction.

Some folks want to choose how they get financial access to system. Hoyt Feb 2016 #1
The policies that actually provide healthcare to people can, though. DanTex Feb 2016 #2
Let's suppose (though I think it is nonsense) that ONLY Hillary could increase the number Bonobo Feb 2016 #3
Bernie might too, as long as he drops the single payer fantasy. DanTex Feb 2016 #7
Your last line ends in a non-sequitur Lordquinton Feb 2016 #52
Your analogy is so clear - thanks left lowrider Feb 2016 #58
Thank you for saying so. nt Bonobo Feb 2016 #59
I thought your argument was only She would beat back a Republican Victory Rilgin Feb 2016 #5
That's true also. And that is the most important thing. DanTex Feb 2016 #8
Bernie is more likely to win against eh Republicans Lordquinton Feb 2016 #53
Please explain how she gets a bill to expand the ACA through Congress. jeff47 Feb 2016 #6
He can't...neither can she though... TCJ70 Feb 2016 #9
She doesn't. It'll have to be executive actions, I don't see much coming out of congress. DanTex Feb 2016 #10
I don't get it. Old Crow Feb 2016 #11
GE polls this far out are meaningless. Everyone knows this. DanTex Feb 2016 #13
That's an interesting response. Old Crow Feb 2016 #17
It's a factual response. Astrological charts are data also. Also meaningless. DanTex Feb 2016 #18
Not a factual response. Old Crow Feb 2016 #20
Astrological charts do contain data. It's just that it's useless, as are GE polls this far out. DanTex Feb 2016 #21
I disagree strongly. Old Crow Feb 2016 #23
Of course you do. That's what usually happens when I present a factual case to Bernie fans. DanTex Feb 2016 #27
Your condescension and snide tone don't help your argument. Old Crow Feb 2016 #32
You should read past the first paragraph of the Vox article. DanTex Feb 2016 #34
You can't drop the condescension, can you? Old Crow Feb 2016 #36
Always a good time! DanTex Feb 2016 #37
The polls are meaningless, but your psychic revelations aren't? HERVEPA Feb 2016 #43
You forgot to be specific. jeff47 Feb 2016 #22
It'll be great watching Sanders amend bills from the White House. Umm, wait. DanTex Feb 2016 #24
You forgot to list what executive actions Clinton can take jeff47 Feb 2016 #28
Post removed Post removed Feb 2016 #31
Still got no list? But you claimed she had a plan, Dan. jeff47 Feb 2016 #33
You think I'm just going to forget that you fabricate quotes out of thin air in order to support DanTex Feb 2016 #35
C'mon Dan. It would be wrong to promise something she could never get, right? jeff47 Feb 2016 #41
Man, you sure don't want to talk about fabricated quotes! DanTex Feb 2016 #42
Change your words? Your words are right there. jeff47 Feb 2016 #46
He's dead, Jim. nt Bonobo Feb 2016 #50
He's pining for the fjords. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2016 #51
An ex-parrot. nt Bonobo Feb 2016 #54
Can't respond. He's on a time out. n/t Contrary1 Feb 2016 #60
Well, he couldn't respond before the time out either. (nt) jeff47 Feb 2016 #64
tell us more about the quotes, Jeff. bettyellen Feb 2016 #66
What quotes? jeff47 Feb 2016 #67
the fabricated quotes! got a link, so I can see how untrue the accusation was? bettyellen Feb 2016 #68
A link to I have no idea what he's talking about? jeff47 Feb 2016 #69
especially when the "increments" are AWAY FROM the actual goal Doctor_J Feb 2016 #4
KnR SammyWinstonJack Feb 2016 #12
another K&R Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #14
Then, I guess . ... ThreeWayFanny Feb 2016 #15
K&R CharlotteVale Feb 2016 #16
Even though I recall the passing of Medicare, SheilaT Feb 2016 #19
When Social Security was first enacted, very few women or minorities were covered. Much better now. Hoyt Feb 2016 #25
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Feb 2016 #26
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Feb 2016 #29
Kicked and Recced eom Arazi Feb 2016 #30
That's because "concepts" aren't implemented. Plans are implemented. pnwmom Feb 2016 #38
K&R. Thanks, Bonobo. senz Feb 2016 #39
Right on. You can definitely say that again. highprincipleswork Feb 2016 #40
Remember the incremental approach for African-American rights? DrBulldog Feb 2016 #44
Several years ago, a Scandinavian country was changing from the right lane to the right lane -- Akamai Feb 2016 #45
But you have to admit, that's not much of a change. cui bono Feb 2016 #48
FYI (#5) HERVEPA Feb 2016 #47
If you don't live in that world, it doesn't seem such an obvious point Babel_17 Feb 2016 #49
Yes, I'm afraid that's true. Bonobo Feb 2016 #55
Kinda depends. zipplewrath Feb 2016 #56
Yes, but that "goal" is health insurance for all that does not (directly) advance the notion Bonobo Feb 2016 #57
+1 n/t area51 Feb 2016 #61
K & R LWolf Feb 2016 #62
While rights are absolute, the implementation of MineralMan Feb 2016 #63
Bernie's plan will put most of Utopian Leftist Feb 2016 #65
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The concept of health car...»Reply #57