Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: 48 hours later:Has Hillary Released the Goldman Sacs Transcripts Yet? [View all]Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)54. It was in her contract that there be transcripts and that she would alone take possession of them
You must have also missed the part where Chuck Todd said they knew that such records existed.
You appear to be far too ill informed to comment. Another possibility is you know what everyone else knows about these facts and are shall we politely say "telling small fibs"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
48 hours later:Has Hillary Released the Goldman Sacs Transcripts Yet? [View all]
Joe the Revelator
Feb 2016
OP
So you want Senator Sanders to release details of his retreat conversations with Goldman Sachs, JP
MADem
Feb 2016
#18
One person is badgered to report what she said for money as a private citizen, while the public
MADem
Feb 2016
#37
Mmmm. Chuck TAWD--I don't put much stock in what he has to say but sure, whatever.
MADem
Feb 2016
#49
Do you really believe that speech was extemporaneous, that she didn't even have crib notes?
hobbit709
Feb 2016
#93
that was a public speech........it was not her private speech to Goldman Sachs
virtualobserver
Feb 2016
#9
why do you think that Goldman Sachs just handing cash to Hillary for her personal use.....
virtualobserver
Feb 2016
#19
She has also donated to charities, so glad to know Sanders has donated money to charities,
Thinkingabout
Feb 2016
#43
bernie never cashes in, and hillary cashes in like no one I've ever seen
virtualobserver
Feb 2016
#44
Establishment, going to Goldman Sachs to get funds, isn't this what Sanders said made establishment?
Thinkingabout
Feb 2016
#46
"one of the Big Money Donors said he didn't say anything that was disturbing to the banking set."
virtualobserver
Feb 2016
#59
His "crime" (that's your embarrassing word, not mine) was telling his supporters that he doesn't
MADem
Feb 2016
#63
DSCC donations are from many sources,did they specifically direct the dirty wall st money to Bernie?
virtualobserver
Feb 2016
#66
Gee, sixty grand of that Wall Street money went to one of his Senate campaigns....
MADem
Feb 2016
#50
Why don't you take your own advice, there, sport? How many times are you going to repeat
MADem
Feb 2016
#65
No, of course not. They are Big Pharma moguls, like Dena Minning, and MIC types from
MADem
Feb 2016
#69
so you are saying that the Democratic Party is funded exclusively by Big Business.
virtualobserver
Feb 2016
#72
it is what you are saying....I am trying to force you to accept the implications of your assertion
virtualobserver
Feb 2016
#77
No, I'm not. I am creating a very real comparison between someone who gives a speech
MADem
Feb 2016
#81
"wall st money" "laundered by the DSCC" that is the smear and not even an artful one
virtualobserver
Feb 2016
#85
Actually, nobody buys any of this, unless they have an H with an arrow burned into their brain cells
virtualobserver
Feb 2016
#95
IOKIYABS, apparently. He doesn't have to reveal what HE said, while collecting a government
MADem
Feb 2016
#21
I'll bet there aren't any, unless the people who issued the invitation either recorded the speech or
MADem
Feb 2016
#17
If we are going to be fair, its important to know how a person running for president line their....
Joe the Revelator
Feb 2016
#20
Lets cut to the chase, do you think both Bernie and Hillary should release whatever transcripts are
Joe the Revelator
Feb 2016
#34
Simple answer--I don't think there ARE any "transcripts" -- as I told you upthread.
MADem
Feb 2016
#42
But we already know. She gave speeches, for which she was paid. Like Jimmy Carter gets paid.
MADem
Feb 2016
#62
It was in her contract that there be transcripts and that she would alone take possession of them
Dragonfli
Feb 2016
#54
Her contract said it also, and more the transcript fee of $1,250 must be paid by the event /nt
Dragonfli
Feb 2016
#58
I think you're going to have to cough up the specific contract before I believe you or the shoddy
MADem
Feb 2016
#68
No problem it is a boierplate one that she uses with specific conditions to be met
Dragonfli
Feb 2016
#71
Unnnnh, no, that's not "proof." There's no evidence that she uses the same contract at every venue
MADem
Feb 2016
#78
What is she looking into if nothing exists and can you prove the producers of the debate
Dragonfli
Feb 2016
#82
"You always cut your own throat with Occam's razor on these fabrications of yours"
MADem
Feb 2016
#84
You think he would lie about that during a televised debate where he could easily be caught
Dragonfli
Feb 2016
#75
I don't care what's in the 'transcripts' she now may provide. I just count the money paid to her.
ViseGrip
Feb 2016
#25
Probably on the dining room side table, next to the Rose Law Firm billing records. Nt
HooptieWagon
Feb 2016
#53