Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
27. Boom
Mon Feb 1, 2016, 07:00 AM
Feb 2016

The shallowness masquerading as thoughtfulness on this thread is quite amusing. Bill Clinton and Obama had no big foreign policy experience. This election is about trust. No ones trusts the Clintons or Bushes after getting to know them. Everyone is desperate to keep liars out of high office.

he probably doesn't think he win the nomination JI7 Feb 2016 #1
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #2
What does that even mean? MADem Feb 2016 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #7
Well, that's not true, but good of you to reveal your bias so early in the game. nt MADem Feb 2016 #11
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #12
That's not true, either. MADem Feb 2016 #13
Post removed Post removed Feb 2016 #15
No, it's not. You have an agenda and you're here to prosecute it. MADem Feb 2016 #16
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #19
Gee, you know a lot about this place! nt MADem Feb 2016 #20
Exactly, Davison Got it Feb 2016 #23
LOL! Bobbie Jo Feb 2016 #48
Woah--he didn't last long, did he? MADem Feb 2016 #59
+ 1000! BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #67
I wouldn't be so sure about that Hekate Feb 2016 #122
No, it's that he isn't informed enough or interested enough in foreign policy BainsBane Feb 2016 #14
Right on the money. nt MADem Feb 2016 #17
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #18
On hearing, I thought, Bernie has a foreign policy advisor? Hortensis Feb 2016 #31
She voted FOR it. Ed Suspicious Feb 2016 #110
Broken record. Come up with something else. Hortensis Feb 2016 #113
Good post...nt SidDithers Feb 2016 #32
That is hogswill kristopher Feb 2016 #35
Well he already knew far more than she did when she helped get us into Iraq: beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #38
Thanks for the link but ... kristopher Feb 2016 #40
As it is in mine. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #42
Being that this is the be-all and end-all on foreign policy treestar Feb 2016 #74
Being that you have to pull out strawmen to support your choice I take it you're okay with her vote. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #76
non responsive treestar Feb 2016 #77
Strawman: "Being that this is the be-all and end-all on foreign policy and nothing else matters" beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #80
That is pretty much the argument you present treestar Feb 2016 #82
Iraq, Syria, Libya, Iran, Honduras...her experience is the problem. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #90
A mere mention of a list of countries does not indicate she did anything wrong on any of those treestar Feb 2016 #91
Where have you been? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #95
Lyria was a typo, it should read Syria and here you go: beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #99
How do you know he isn't informed enough? Perogie Feb 2016 #51
No, I didn't think of that. pangaia Feb 2016 #86
Excellent post! (Deserves to be an OP!) NurseJackie Feb 2016 #54
Excellent post! Spazito Feb 2016 #55
VERY well said NastyRiffraff Feb 2016 #56
Great Post!!! n/t asuhornets Feb 2016 #61
Iraq. Libya. Honduras. polly7 Feb 2016 #62
WELL DONE!!! beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #97
Thank you, bmus! polly7 Feb 2016 #104
This is the second time in as many days I've seen a Hillary supporter defend Kissinger. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #106
Unbelievable, isn't it? polly7 Feb 2016 #107
For the same reason Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld haven't been. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #108
Nothing would surprise me anymore. polly7 Feb 2016 #109
Well at least the op gave us a chance to prove once again why Hillary isn't qualified to be CiC. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #111
Not quite what the op was hoping for, I'm sure. polly7 Feb 2016 #117
It's funny, that happens a lot with her ops. :) beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #118
It really does. polly7 Feb 2016 #124
VERY well said, BB Hekate Feb 2016 #123
Sanders has been in Congress since 1992, and his votes including his vote on the Iraq War JDPriestly Feb 2016 #3
Exactly! tecelote Feb 2016 #24
More Warmongers billhicks76 Feb 2016 #25
K & R SunSeeker Feb 2016 #5
Keep trying, this one isn't getting any traction either. nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #6
Keeping America Safe 101: Are there Cliff Notes available? oasis Feb 2016 #8
And... Nanjeanne Feb 2016 #9
Hillary needs to stop speaking to whoever is advising her on military and foreign matters. merrily Feb 2016 #10
One name that screams incompetence: Kissinger beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #44
Kissinger, Will Marshall, Bubba, whomever. merrily Feb 2016 #45
Scary! nt. polly7 Feb 2016 #49
Is there any evidence that she has received any advice from Kissinger? treestar Feb 2016 #75
Emails expose close ties between Hillary Clinton and accused war criminal Henry Kissinger beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #78
He hasn't been tried and convicted. treestar Feb 2016 #81
Emails expose close ties between Hillary Clinton and accused war criminal Henry Kissinger polly7 Feb 2016 #87
So his observations on foreign leaders are not astute? treestar Feb 2016 #92
No, not astute. A warmongering, murder/torturing supporter asshole isn't capable of 'astuteness' polly7 Feb 2016 #94
Neither have Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld et al. Would they be suitable advisers now too? polly7 Feb 2016 #88
None of those three would be good at any time treestar Feb 2016 #93
Why not??? polly7 Feb 2016 #96
That's your defense of a war criminal? Bush and Cheney weren't tried and convicted either. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #89
That's a lot of innuendo treestar Feb 2016 #100
Innuendo .............. wow, you're actually defending Kissinger?! polly7 Feb 2016 #102
You're just now learning of Kissinger's complicity and you've already absolved him? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #105
Way ahead of Clinton's endorsement of the Iraqq war eridani Feb 2016 #21
What kind of briefing do you think he needs? Bonobo Feb 2016 #22
Boom billhicks76 Feb 2016 #27
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #29
Great response, nt. Broward Feb 2016 #30
^^^THIS^^^ beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #36
Thank you Bonobo! polly7 Feb 2016 #47
The kind that would tell him a sectarian proxy war in the Middle East is a bad idea Renew Deal Feb 2016 #50
Thank you, Bains! Cha Feb 2016 #26
Lol EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #28
Yep, the soap opera actress/blogger she cited lied about Bernie and the op is trying to save face. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #33
Well... EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #37
More manufactured outrage about yet another manufactured scandal. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #39
But EdwardBernays Feb 2016 #41
The confusion seems to be on the other side. beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #43
DU rec...nt SidDithers Feb 2016 #34
Scary! NurseJackie Feb 2016 #46
Hahaha azmom Feb 2016 #70
Hillary is always ready for to go to War , especially if its not needed. bahrbearian Feb 2016 #52
Interesting mcar Feb 2016 #53
Hmmmmm yardwork Feb 2016 #57
"Sanders military adviser briefed him once" OMG what a joke! Is Bernie a serious candidate??? workinclasszero Feb 2016 #58
I'm beginning to think he's not. BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #66
Bernie has tunnel vision workinclasszero Feb 2016 #68
You'd think he'd change strategy when he realized how weak he is on foreign policy issues. But no. BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #69
The man has one speech for all occasions workinclasszero Feb 2016 #85
And being in Congress all those years and not learning more than that? treestar Feb 2016 #84
Hmmmmm.... 99Forever Feb 2016 #60
You mean he isn't going to repeat Bush's lies word for word, and trick us into war? arcane1 Feb 2016 #63
Good. Hillary probably talks to military advisors several times throughout the day. frylock Feb 2016 #64
In these dangerous times, the LAST thing we need is a foreign policy light-weight in the White House BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #65
What can we deduce? Is this a clue that he might be somewhat of an "isolationist"? Who knows? NurseJackie Feb 2016 #71
Who is threatening the U.S. at this moment? nt. polly7 Feb 2016 #73
Who exactly do you believe is threatening the U.S. militarily and what should be done about it? nt. polly7 Feb 2016 #72
How are we in danger, who is Hillary going to save us from? beam me up scottie Feb 2016 #112
At least he didn't vote to invade the wrong fucking country !!!! pangaia Feb 2016 #79
This message was self-deleted by its author TheFarS1de Feb 2016 #83
Meow. AtomicKitten Feb 2016 #98
We don't need any military advice, we need peace advisers! B Calm Feb 2016 #101
Whether a politician is briefed once, if this source is correct, guillaumeb Feb 2016 #103
Sanders has not put out his Foreign policy proposal --so we and voters have riversedge Feb 2016 #115
True, so is the choice between: a "well briefed" politician who has chosen the wrong actions guillaumeb Feb 2016 #116
Hillary has said that military intervertion riversedge Feb 2016 #119
Libya, Syria, what next? guillaumeb Feb 2016 #120
What would be a question Bernie might have, that requires consultation with a military adviser? immoderate Feb 2016 #114
I'm impressed. KnR Hekate Feb 2016 #121
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"Sanders military ad...»Reply #27