Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: For the real cowards, the best of Dawkins. [View all]backscatter712
(26,355 posts)69. I suppose I get to do my debating opponents' work for them.
So let me throw this out there. Dawkins did indeed say that being raised Catholic is worse than child abuse in a specific case.
Source:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2251963/Being-raised-Catholic-worse-child-abuse-Latest-incendiary-claim-atheist-professor-Richard-Dawkins.html
Aaaaand, I'm gonna put a big target on my back and say that in the particular case he was talking about, HE'S RIGHT!
Why?
Because the doctrines taught to children by the priesthood and others working for the RCC constitute a form of emotional abuse. This abuse has left psychological scars in countless people that last a lifetime.
From the Daily Mail article:
In typically incendiary style, Professor Dawkins said the mental torment inflicted by the religions teachings is worse in the long-term than any sexual abuse carried out by priests.
He said he had been told by a woman that while being abused by a priest was a yucky experience, being told as a child that a Protestant friend who died would roast in Hell was more distressing.
He said he had been told by a woman that while being abused by a priest was a yucky experience, being told as a child that a Protestant friend who died would roast in Hell was more distressing.
Dawkins addresses what he said in his own article:
http://www.richarddawkins.net/foundation_articles/2012/12/22/physical-versus-mental-child-abuse
Once, in the question time after a lecture in Dublin, I was asked what I thought about the widely publicized cases of sexual abuse by Catholic priests in Ireland. I replied that, horrible as sexual abuse no doubt was, the damage was arguably less than the long-term psychological damage inflicted by bringing the child up Catholic in the first place. It was an off-the-cuff remark made in the heat of the moment, and I was surprised that it earned a round of enthusiastic applause from that Irish audience (composed, admittedly, of Dublin intellectuals and presumably not representative of the country at large). But I was reminded of the incident later when I received a letter from an American woman in her forties who had been brought up Roman Catholic. At the age of seven, she told me, two unpleasant things had happened to her. She was sexually abused by her parish priest in his car. And, around the same time, a little schoolfriend of hers, who had tragically died, went to hell because she was a Protestant. Or so my correspondent had been led to believe by the then official doctrine of her parents church. Her view as a mature adult was that, of these two examples of Roman Catholic child abuse, the one physical and the other mental, the second was by far the worst. She wrote
"Being fondled by the priest simply left the impression (from the mind of a 7 year old) as yucky while the memory of my friend going to hell was one of cold, immeasurable fear. I never lost sleep because of the priest but I spent many a night being terrified that the people I loved would go to Hell. It gave me nightmares."
"Being fondled by the priest simply left the impression (from the mind of a 7 year old) as yucky while the memory of my friend going to hell was one of cold, immeasurable fear. I never lost sleep because of the priest but I spent many a night being terrified that the people I loved would go to Hell. It gave me nightmares."
Many Christian teachings (and not just Catholic teachings) are highly emotionally abusive, especially when taught to children. And when children are immersed in such emotional abuse for years of their lives, the results can be devastating.
The whole concept of Hell, as commonly used to scare children into compliance, is fucking despicable. As is the concept of original sin - like I said in other threads, the concept REQUIRES Christians that adhere to it to have no self-esteem. They MUST believe that they are evil, unworthy, deserving of death, and completely irredeemable. The only esteem allowed to them is that which is granted to them by religious figures.
Then in my other thread, there's the teachings of the Good News Clubs (yes, I know, different flavor of Christianity, but in most cases, only a slightly different take from the Catholic version). And they're also extremely psychologically abusive towards the children they teach. Kids are repeatedly taught about Hell, to scare them, taught that they are horrible people, taught that only Jesus can save them, and that they can't do anything good enough by themselves. They're taught that they must absolutely OBEY the orders from religious figures, even if they're orders to commit genocide (Israel vs the Amalekites, 1 Sam 15.) They're taught misogyny and homophobia. Girls are taught that they must submit to males. Homosexuality is to be regarded as disgusting and sinful.
From the other thread, I mentioned Erik Cernyar, the attorney who was onstage with Richard Dawkins. There's a reason why he's fighting hard against the Good News Clubs. He attended a Good News Club when he was a kid, and he was threatened with Hell, and he was taught the "you are evil scum" lessons. He said onstage that later in his life, he attempted suicide because of mental anguish caused by those teachings.
He attempted suicide. Thankfully, he did not succeed.
How can I put it more plainly? The teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, and other Christian churches, are emotionally abusive, and cause serious psychological damage to children.
They kill.
I rest my case.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I noticed that the atheists did not take up my challenge to post their real names
Fortinbras Armstrong
Mar 2013
#35
He won't debate me, because he knows that he is supporting ignorant bigotry
Fortinbras Armstrong
Mar 2013
#45
While your "quote" is not exactly the words of Richard Dawkins it is the essential point he makes
Leontius
Mar 2013
#61
Odious as the physical abuse of children by priests undoubtedly is, I suspect that it may
Leontius
Mar 2013
#67
Such hatred and intolerance is rooted in ignorance. Were he to actually READ Dawkins...
cleanhippie
Mar 2013
#23
Then you should be able to cite passages you find "bigoted" or "ignorant." n/t
backscatter712
Mar 2013
#47
Tell me how "raising a child to be Catholic is worse than child abuse" is not a bigoted statement
Fortinbras Armstrong
Mar 2013
#33
True - he was talking about a specific case, not making a broad-brush statement. n/t
backscatter712
Mar 2013
#77
I guess when you're preaching to the choir truth doesn't matter regardless of what church you're in
Leontius
Mar 2013
#90
Explain how emotionally traumatizing a child with threats of hell isn't abusive.
backscatter712
Mar 2013
#87
He said "is a form of," not "is worse than." And I do support Richard Dawkins.
2ndAmForComputers
Mar 2013
#98
Your observation seems spot-on. In fact, we can all observe that right in this thread.
cleanhippie
Mar 2013
#25
man oh man is the dude a crashing boor. i tried to watch this, but frankly chewing gum
struggle4progress
Mar 2013
#30
You misrepresented his statement in context. I demonstrated you were wrong with the actual video.
Gore1FL
Mar 2013
#92
There was no change to his statement by any supposed "context" you claim shown by the video
Leontius
Mar 2013
#93
Dawkins has made some smart points and I think debate of religion is really important.
napoleon_in_rags
Mar 2013
#52