Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Why Sometimes Religion Should Be Criticized [View all]
Most people, understanding good manners, have distaste for those who are vocally critical of the religious beliefs of others. Theological decisions are recognized as deeply personal, and common decency dictates that we respect the rights of others to believe what they wish, assuming those beliefs cause no harm to others. The vast majority of humanists, even those actively engaged in the secular movement, share the general public's sentiments on this issue. Live and let live, right?
We should realize, however, that the social norm that discourages the criticism of religion can work to the great advantage of religious political activists. Social conservatives, for example, righteously claiming the highest moral authority grounded in religion, knowing that criticism of religion is considered off-limits, can demand that their policy positions be given legitimacy even when those positions lack any rational basis.
--snip--
Here we see the cost of our good manners. With social rules that say we shouldnt criticize religion, any public debate with the bishops must ignore the theology that is the basis of the bishops' position and focus instead on the proper meaning of the term religious freedom. In essence, these men can use their theology as a means of jeopardizing the health of millions.
--snip--
Good manners are commendable, but silence in the face of efforts to deny basic health care is not good manners. Common decency certainly requires respect for the individual rights of others, but it does not demand that we let the arbitrary theological preferences of others shape public policy. In fact, when theology advocates harmful health policy, common decency may require that good manners be set aside.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/our-humanity-naturally/201302/why-sometimes-religion-should-be-criticized
We should realize, however, that the social norm that discourages the criticism of religion can work to the great advantage of religious political activists. Social conservatives, for example, righteously claiming the highest moral authority grounded in religion, knowing that criticism of religion is considered off-limits, can demand that their policy positions be given legitimacy even when those positions lack any rational basis.
--snip--
Here we see the cost of our good manners. With social rules that say we shouldnt criticize religion, any public debate with the bishops must ignore the theology that is the basis of the bishops' position and focus instead on the proper meaning of the term religious freedom. In essence, these men can use their theology as a means of jeopardizing the health of millions.
--snip--
Good manners are commendable, but silence in the face of efforts to deny basic health care is not good manners. Common decency certainly requires respect for the individual rights of others, but it does not demand that we let the arbitrary theological preferences of others shape public policy. In fact, when theology advocates harmful health policy, common decency may require that good manners be set aside.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/our-humanity-naturally/201302/why-sometimes-religion-should-be-criticized
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
35 replies, 4036 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I suspect that he won't answer because, other than the constant whine that atheists are bigots,
mr blur
Feb 2013
#19
I agree that some atheists are bigots, especially Dawkins and his sycophants.
Starboard Tack
Feb 2013
#25
In other words, you believe that there should not be consequences for one's actions
Fortinbras Armstrong
Feb 2013
#27
No, I didn't say that, but you obviously have no comeback except to lie about what I did say
Fortinbras Armstrong
Feb 2013
#32
I believe Dawkins main sin is having 600,000 twitter followers and teaching them
dimbear
Feb 2013
#23