Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
46. Agreed.
Fri May 11, 2012, 08:10 PM
May 2012

However, if it was beneficial to society at large (and deemed so by secular policy makers) would it not have grounding outside of religion?

Good policy is good policy. RandySF May 2012 #1
Yes, but.... cleanhippie May 2012 #7
That's the question Why Syzygy May 2012 #15
You said "a" basis, not "the" basis. bananas May 2012 #20
Just for you, replace "a" with "it's" cleanhippie May 2012 #22
I voted Pass Goblinmonger May 2012 #2
Can you cite an example? KansDem May 2012 #3
This is purely a hypothetical exercise. cleanhippie May 2012 #8
I voted yes but am interested in what criteria policy makers should use LARED May 2012 #4
Is the policy soley based on a relgious belief? cleanhippie May 2012 #9
That's a different question than asked in the poll LARED May 2012 #40
Im answering the question you posed to me. cleanhippie May 2012 #45
If your point was to establish that good public policy can exist, and does, outside of religious LARED May 2012 #48
It's is obvious then that the point was over your head. cleanhippie May 2012 #49
Your words LARED May 2012 #55
Whoosh! cleanhippie May 2012 #58
So explain to this poor denighted DU'er. LARED May 2012 #59
Pass. cleanhippie May 2012 #60
Figured as much LARED May 2012 #62
You can just add that to the list of other things you need to believe cleanhippie May 2012 #66
Don't you get tired of being wrong? LARED May 2012 #69
It's much easier to claim "I win" when you get to do that. Leontius May 2012 #70
Post removed Post removed May 2012 #72
Hahaha! If you say so, lared cleanhippie May 2012 #71
You mean like 'thou shalt not kill'? Scuba May 2012 #5
This is just hypothetical. cleanhippie May 2012 #10
Can't deal with reality, eh? bananas May 2012 #21
As a believer, It would seem that it is YOU that has the issue with reality. cleanhippie May 2012 #23
For someone using childishly inapt and naive "gotcha" tactics... Silent3 May 2012 #57
Sure - secular groups never thought of that one. dmallind May 2012 #12
Us atheists don't have morality, remember/ Scuba May 2012 #25
No such thing exists. Fresh_Start May 2012 #6
We share the same thoughts. cleanhippie May 2012 #24
of course I am judging by western religions Fresh_Start May 2012 #27
The closest thing to that may be the Unitarian Universalists. cleanhippie May 2012 #28
Counterintuitively, I voted yes. I need to show caveats however dmallind May 2012 #11
No, it violates prong 1 of the Lemon test longship May 2012 #13
Lemon does not address origin of the idea dmallind May 2012 #19
Entanglement? That would be prong 3 of the Lemon test longship May 2012 #50
Where the fuck does it entangle? dmallind May 2012 #52
"...merely takes an idea from religion." longship May 2012 #64
Hypothetically, if there was a religious-based public policy that was deemed to be... brendan120678 May 2012 #14
Agreed. cleanhippie May 2012 #46
Good policy is good policy. Its origins are irrelevant. n/t cynatnite May 2012 #16
If it's a good policy its origins are irrelevant. rug May 2012 #17
actually, religious beliefs are based on public policy (public opinion really). good people preceded msongs May 2012 #18
We have a winner! cleanhippie May 2012 #26
If it's "really good," you'll find it can be stated with no reference whatsoever to religious belief 2ndAmForComputers May 2012 #29
Bam! Winner! cleanhippie May 2012 #34
Yes. laconicsax May 2012 #30
Who decides what is good policy? cleanhippie May 2012 #31
Those charged with voting on it. laconicsax May 2012 #32
You mean like the voters of North Carolina? cleanhippie May 2012 #33
I never said that voters always get it right. laconicsax May 2012 #35
I think 2amforcomputers nailed it with this... cleanhippie May 2012 #36
And I agree completely with that assessment. laconicsax May 2012 #37
Perhaps I needed to be more specific. cleanhippie May 2012 #38
That, to me, reads as a different issue than your OP laconicsax May 2012 #41
It is different from the OP cleanhippie May 2012 #47
The laws against consuming human flesh as a dietary staple have a religious origin. dimbear May 2012 #39
kuru struggle4progress May 2012 #42
There were also many religious and cultural rituals and practices that encouraged... Humanist_Activist May 2012 #43
There are loads of cultures across history that didn't practice cannibalism laconicsax May 2012 #53
The one that comes to mind is Judaism. Human flesh isn't kosher. dimbear May 2012 #63
Judaism wasn't required for other cultures to avoid cannibalism. laconicsax May 2012 #65
There is no such thing as a good public policy that has solely religious origins... Humanist_Activist May 2012 #44
Selected pass. rrneck May 2012 #51
Yes, if it's a good policy in general LeftishBrit May 2012 #54
If religion is the *only* basis, then no. trotsky May 2012 #56
I vote yes. westerebus May 2012 #61
I am going to define "good public policy" as "public policy currently favored by ZombieHorde." ZombieHorde May 2012 #67
If it's good policy, it can be justified by secular means. backscatter712 May 2012 #68
I'll pass AlbertCat May 2012 #73
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Should a really good publ...»Reply #46