Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Yorktown

(2,884 posts)
Tue May 19, 2015, 09:03 PM May 2015

Checking Charlie Hebdo’s Privilege (Douthat, NYT) [View all]

Checking Charlie Hebdo’s Privilege

APRIL 18, 2015 - Ross Douthat - NYT

A LIVING cartoonist lecturing his murdered peers makes for a curious spectacle, but that’s what transpired at journalism’s George Polk Awards a week ago. The lecturer was Garry Trudeau, of “Doonesbury” fame; his subject was the cartoonists for Charlie Hebdo, (..)
“ridiculing the non-privileged is almost never funny — it’s just mean.”

Trudeau is hardly the first writer to accuse the Hebdo cartoonists of “punching down.” (..) David Frum, in a response to Trudeau, distilled as follows: In any given conflict, first “identify the bearer of privilege,” then “hold the privilege-bearer responsible.”
(..)
on the contemporary left, the theory’s simplicity is becoming a kind of intellectual straitjacket. The Hebdo massacre is just one of many cases in which today’s progressives, in the name of overthrowing hierarchies, end up assuming that lines of power are predictable, permanent and clear.

Which they are not, for several reasons.

First, while power flows from pre-existing privilege, it also grows from the barrel of a gun, and the willingness to deal out violence changes power dynamics, even when it doesn’t have a truly revolutionary outcome. The terrorist’s veto on portrayals of Islam is itself a very real form of power, and as long as journalists who challenge it end up dead, the idea that they are “up” and their targets are “down” reflects a denial of life-and-death reality. (..)

Second, we live in a world where William Gibson’s insight that “the future is already here — it’s just not very evenly distributed” is vindicated every day, and where migration and communication bring cultures that are experiencing this uneven distribution into constant contact. In a globalized world, the faith that the Hebdo cartoonists mocked is the faith of both the powerless and the powerful, (..)

Third and finally, almost every official hierarchy of victimhood tends toward some kind of blindness or partiality.
(..)


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/19/opinion/sunday/ross-douthat-checking-charlie-hebdos-privilege.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2Fross-douthat

64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
religionists are the most privliged class on the planet. they commit wholesale murder and the victim msongs May 2015 #1
Yup. Charlie Hebdo, Geller, Jylland Posten, they all got blamed Yorktown May 2015 #2
Devastating turnaround of Trudeau's critique, right back at him. trotsky May 2015 #3
Breaking News, just in Yorktown May 2015 #4
Which other rightwingers do you suggest we read? rug May 2015 #16
Does an argument validity depend on who says it? Yorktown May 2015 #26
Apparently. rug May 2015 #35
Question about the alert you posted Yorktown May 2015 #39
Not quite. It depends on how it's used. rug May 2015 #60
Ross Douthat? Really? cbayer May 2015 #5
But cbayer, you have no problem with the anti-abortion and anti-gay rhetoric of the pope. trotsky May 2015 #6
But that's totally different. AtheistCrusader May 2015 #7
And also... trotsky May 2015 #8
I don't agree with... MellowDem May 2015 #9
This guy is a hypocrite when it comes to religious privilege. cbayer May 2015 #10
I agree the guy is a hypocrite... MellowDem May 2015 #13
Agree about broken clocks. The danger is in thinking they cbayer May 2015 #14
Was Charlie Hebdo persecuted? Did its attackers enjoy the privilege of violence? Yorktown May 2015 #28
May your time here be brief. cbayer May 2015 #31
You are the gold standard of tolerance Yorktown May 2015 #32
I was just asked to serve on a Jury for this post edhopper May 2015 #41
I laughed and voted to leave it pintobean May 2015 #42
Yeah edhopper May 2015 #43
Apparently the jury saw fit to leave it. cbayer May 2015 #47
What is a just blacklist? edhopper May 2015 #55
I have a blacklist of people who are not permitted to serve on juries cbayer May 2015 #58
Thanks edhopper May 2015 #61
It's unlikely you would need it, but it's available to you if you wanted it. cbayer May 2015 #64
You mean like grownups who brag about laughing at other people's religions? trotsky May 2015 #63
In case anyone asks, I did not 'alert' over any of cbayer's posts Yorktown May 2015 #50
Well I, for one edhopper May 2015 #56
Thanks. Yorktown May 2015 #59
I guess he's not "lovable", like Ben Carson is. Act_of_Reparation May 2015 #11
Oh, please. If you can't distinguish between a person in a movie cbayer May 2015 #12
2 serving 0 Act_of_Reparation May 2015 #18
Surely, you are better than this. cbayer May 2015 #20
3 serving 0 Act_of_Reparation May 2015 #29
I am finished with you. Please feel free to let me know if you want to cbayer May 2015 #30
Well fucking done. n/t trotsky May 2015 #40
That was so hot. I'm in love with you Heddi May 2015 #57
Don't forget to give him some green stamps. trotsky May 2015 #62
Right wing! Right Wing! rug May 2015 #15
As long as it's not a right chicken wing, lol! cbayer May 2015 #17
Hitler was a vegetarian too! rug May 2015 #19
And adorable!! What a coincidence. cbayer May 2015 #21
Hitler was all for EMP weapons. rug May 2015 #22
Oh, yeah, well did Hitler lose a couple of teeth during a campaign breakfast cbayer May 2015 #23
Hitler had terrible teeth. rug May 2015 #24
OMG, I think Hitler and Ben Carson might be the same person! cbayer May 2015 #25
I'll ask around. rug May 2015 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author rug May 2015 #37
Chomsky recently said the NYT is the world's best newspaper Yorktown May 2015 #27
It's the Aubusson of bird-cage liners. okasha May 2015 #33
Which means? Yorktown May 2015 #34
That she shares an opinion with Ann Coulter. n/t trotsky May 2015 #44
Does it mean okasha leans RW? Yorktown May 2015 #45
It means there is a disgusting RWer that she agrees with on at least one particular item. trotsky May 2015 #46
Hypocritical criticisms? Here? In the 'Religion' forum? Yorktown May 2015 #48
LOL trotsky May 2015 #49
Well, i'll tell you the only thing I think I learnt so far here: Yorktown May 2015 #51
... Fix The Stupid May 2015 #53
Hypocritical? Act_of_Reparation May 2015 #54
Trudeau's speech is far more thought provoking than anything in Douthat's attempted rebuttal. Jim__ May 2015 #38
Yet "privileged" and "non-privileged" only make sense in context. trotsky May 2015 #52
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Checking Charlie Hebdo’s ...»Reply #0