Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Yorktown

(2,884 posts)
41. Critics of Nazism were bigots.
Mon May 18, 2015, 01:44 AM
May 2015

After all, who do the critics think they were to criticize and mock something followed by dozens of millions Germans. Ditto for Stalinism: Stalin was viewed favorably by 45% of the 150 millions or so Russians. Ditto for Maoism: lots of people in the countriside still revere Mao as a demi god; who are we to judge.

Next, I'm going to launch my cult religion which will involve cannibalism.
I fully expect my critics to be called bigots.
Unless some people use double standards. Which I do not think would happen here.

It's the best part of religious privilege... MellowDem May 2015 #1
+1 n/t trotsky May 2015 #2
Quite a lot of posters here skepticscott May 2015 #4
Believe it or not, this got alerted on skepticscott May 2015 #12
That someone alerted is one thing edhopper May 2015 #16
I noticed that too skepticscott May 2015 #17
One of the Clan was definitely there. rug May 2015 #18
A bit of a tacky alert there, don't you think? mr blur May 2015 #19
no such thing as alert-stalking in Religion... Yorktown May 2015 #40
I love this part: beam me up scottie May 2015 #3
That sounds so very familiar. Lordquinton May 2015 #6
Equating criticism of religion with bigotry is common on both the left and right. beam me up scottie May 2015 #7
Critics of Nazism were bigots. Yorktown May 2015 #41
religion is learned cultural behavior. believers go along with their culture even tho they may msongs May 2015 #5
Isn't he they guy who claimed to be a religious scholar, but it turns out he lied about it? Lordquinton May 2015 #8
A "religious scholar"? rug May 2015 #9
This is what I was looking for Lordquinton May 2015 #13
That hardly makes him a fraud. rug May 2015 #15
There are countless anti-atheists around, your Pope, for starters Lordquinton May 2015 #22
Actually, to your chagrin, he is not an "anti-atheist". rug May 2015 #23
No, because I am adamantly against Pedophilla Lordquinton May 2015 #25
Who isn't? Do you want a medal? rug May 2015 #32
You just compared Richard Dawkins to Pedophilia Lordquinton May 2015 #34
Lol, no I compared your lame caricature to one that is significantly more accurate. rug May 2015 #35
You seem confused Lordquinton May 2015 #36
Except the only one who mentioned Dawkins was you. rug May 2015 #37
You're still confused Lordquinton May 2015 #38
Doesn't mention Dawkins. Does that description remind you of him? rug May 2015 #39
your post was very unclear Lordquinton May 2015 #44
Projection tends to cloud understanding. rug May 2015 #45
Your posts aren't making any sense. Lordquinton May 2015 #49
In a nutshell, I think you're making too many assumptions. rug May 2015 #54
I still can't figure out what you mean, please clarify Lordquinton May 2015 #71
Somebody hit somebody's nerve. rug May 2015 #10
Yeah, no tkmorris May 2015 #11
QED. rug May 2015 #14
Yes, the fact that I think his argument is ridiculous tkmorris May 2015 #24
QED squared. rug May 2015 #33
what you actually meant is "case in point". Warren Stupidity May 2015 #65
No, Warren, what I actually meant was what I actuallly typed. rug May 2015 #66
Well I tried to help you out, but keep misusing QED. It is amusing. Warren Stupidity May 2015 #67
To be precise, it was QED squared. rug May 2015 #69
which is of course meaningless if you had been using QED correctly to begin with, Warren Stupidity May 2015 #70
Warren, do you really think you're in a position to lecture anyone on the proper use of words? rug May 2015 #72
Yes. Warren Stupidity May 2015 #74
Ok. Explain your credentials then. rug May 2015 #75
Wait. You are demanding "credentials" for responses on an internet message board? Warren Stupidity May 2015 #76
In your case, yeah. rug May 2015 #77
project much? Warren Stupidity May 2015 #79
I never project. rug May 2015 #82
Agreed. I like what he said about giving credit to religion when it does good. hrmjustin May 2015 #21
Reza Aslan: the Deepak Chopra of Islam? Yorktown May 2015 #20
Score: Aslan-1 Daily Banter - 0 doxyluv13 May 2015 #26
No kidding. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #29
Reza... deathrind May 2015 #27
A rather peculiar article, and thread. LTX May 2015 #28
Do folks deride cafeteria Christians? Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2015 #30
I don't deride them, but the term itself is usually deployed derisively. LTX May 2015 #31
Indeed nil desperandum May 2015 #42
Setting aside your non sequitur, LTX May 2015 #51
It's not that Reza is wrong. gcomeau May 2015 #47
First, why would a declaration that religion is irrelevant be a problem? LTX May 2015 #52
Perhaps nil desperandum May 2015 #53
It's a problem... gcomeau May 2015 #59
So I'll just ask you for your considered opinion: LTX May 2015 #60
Lots of factors.. gcomeau May 2015 #62
Thanks. A relatively thoughtful answer. LTX May 2015 #63
That's a honest answer, but you concede irrationality Yorktown May 2015 #64
I was taught religion by non-believing parents and Catholic school. hrmjustin May 2015 #43
Actually... he's not entirely wrong. gcomeau May 2015 #46
That is a very good point. trotsky May 2015 #48
Reducing religions to mere labels with no necessary beliefs behind them renders... Humanist_Activist May 2015 #50
You Don't Believe That Cultural Identity Exists? On the Road May 2015 #55
See the post right above from Humanist_Activist. trotsky May 2015 #56
Still Don't Get the Objection On the Road May 2015 #57
Probably because there is no "objection" - it's funny that in his desperation to absolve religion... trotsky May 2015 #58
I missed that part. What did he say that led you to understand that LTX May 2015 #61
Hint: Google "Reza Aslan" trotsky May 2015 #68
I'm familiar with Aslan. I think he's generally rather superficial in his analyses. LTX May 2015 #73
Superficial, yes. Which he has to be in order to pull off stuff like this: trotsky May 2015 #80
Isn't that precisely the point made atheists and critics of religion? LTX May 2015 #81
Nope, completely the opposite. trotsky May 2015 #83
Ok, this is getting kind of odd. LTX May 2015 #84
Its not an objection, but an observation, if belief is no longer necessary for... Humanist_Activist May 2015 #78
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Reza Aslan Made the Worst...»Reply #41