Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
30. Here is the whole Homily, it is to the New Cardinals of the Church.
Sun Feb 15, 2015, 09:43 PM
Feb 2015
http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/homilies/2015/documents/papa-francesco_20150215_omelia-nuovi-cardinali.html

“Lord, if you choose, you can make me clean”… Jesus, moved with compassion, stretched out his hand and touched him, and said: “I do choose. Be made clean!” (Mk 1:40-41). The compassion of Jesus! That com-passion which made him draw near to every person in pain! Jesus does not hold back; instead, he gets involved in people’s pain and their need… for the simple reason that he knows and wants to show com-passion, because he has a heart unashamed to have “compassion”.

“Jesus could no longer go into a town openly, but stayed in the country; and people came to him from every quarter” (Mk 1:45). This means that Jesus not only healed the leper but also took upon himself the marginalization enjoined by the law of Moses (cf. Lev 13:1-2, 45-46). Jesus is unafraid to risk sharing in the suffering of others; he pays the price of it in full (cf. Is 53:4).

Compassion leads Jesus to concrete action: he reinstates the marginalized! These are the three key concepts that the Church proposes in today’s liturgy of the word: the compassion of Jesus in the face of marginalization and his desire to reinstate.

Marginalization: Moses, in his legislation regarding lepers, says that they are to be kept alone and apart from the community for the duration of their illness. He declares them: “unclean!” (cf. Lev 13:1-2, 45-46).

Imagine how much suffering and shame lepers must have felt: physically, socially, psychologically and spiritually! They are not only victims of disease, but they feel guilty about it, punished for their sins! Theirs is a living death; they are like someone whose father has spit in his face (cf. Num 12:14).

In addition, lepers inspire fear, contempt and loathing, and so they are abandoned by their families, shunned by other persons, cast out by society. Indeed, society rejects them and forces them to live apart from the healthy. It excludes them. So much so that if a healthy person approached a leper, he would be punished severely, and often be treated as a leper himself.

True, the purpose of this rule was “to safeguard the healthy”, “to protect the righteous”, and, in order to guard them from any risk, to eliminate “the peril” by treating the diseased person harshly. As the high priest Caiaphas exclaimed: “It is better to have one man die for the people than to have the whole nation destroyed” (Jn 11:50).

Reinstatement: Jesus revolutionizes and upsets that fearful, narrow and prejudiced mentality. He does not abolish the law of Moses, but rather brings it to fulfillment (cf. Mt 5:17). He does so by stating, for example, that the law of retaliation is counterproductive, that God is not pleased by a Sabbath observance which demeans or condemns a man. He does so by refusing to condemn the sinful woman, but saves her from the blind zeal of those prepared to stone her ruthlessly in the belief that they were applying the law of Moses. Jesus also revolutionizes consciences in the Sermon on the Mount (cf. Mt 5), opening new horizons for humanity and fully revealing God’s “logic”. The logic of love, based not on fear but on freedom and charity, on healthy zeal and the saving will of God. For “God our Saviour desires everyone to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth” (1 Tim 2:3-4). “I desire mercy and not sacrifice” (Mt 12 ; Hos 6:6).

Jesus, the new Moses, wanted to heal the leper. He wanted to touch him and restore him to the community without being “hemmed in” by prejudice, conformity to the prevailing mindset or worry about becoming infected. Jesus responds immediately to the leper’s plea, without waiting to study the situation and all its possible consequences! For Jesus, what matters above all is reaching out to save those far off, healing the wounds of the sick, restoring everyone to God’s family! And this is scandalous to some people!

Jesus is not afraid of this kind of scandal! He does not think of the closed-minded who are scandalized even by a work of healing, scandalized before any kind of openness, by any action outside of their mental and spiritual boxes, by any caress or sign of tenderness which does not fit into their usual thinking and their ritual purity. He wanted to reinstate the outcast, to save those outside the camp (cf. Jn 10).

There are two ways of thinking and of having faith: we can fear to lose the saved and we can want to save the lost. Even today it can happen that we stand at the crossroads of these two ways of thinking. The thinking of the doctors of the law, which would remove the danger by casting out the diseased person, and the thinking of God, who in his mercy embraces and accepts by reinstating him and turning evil into good, condemnation into salvation and exclusion into proclamation.

These two ways of thinking are present throughout the Church’s history: casting off and reinstating. Saint Paul, following the Lord’s command to bring the Gospel message to the ends of the earth (cf. Mt 28:19), caused scandal and met powerful resistance and great hostility, especially from those who demanded unconditional obedience to the Mosaic law, even on the part of converted pagans. Saint Peter, too, was bitterly criticized by the community when he entered the house of the pagan centurion Cornelius (cf. Acts 10).

The Church’s way, from the time of the Council of Jerusalem, has always always been the way of Jesus, the way of mercy and reinstatement. This does not mean underestimating the dangers of letting wolves into the fold, but welcoming the repentant prodigal son; healing the wounds of sin with courage and determination; rolling up our sleeves and not standing by and watching passively the suffering of the world. The way of the Church is not to condemn anyone for eternity; to pour out the balm of God’s mercy on all those who ask for it with a sincere heart. The way of the Church is precisely to leave her four walls behind and to go out in search of those who are distant, those essentially on the “outskirts” of life. It is to adopt fully God’s own approach, to follow the Master who said: “Those who are well have no need of the physician, but those who are sick; I have come to call, not the righteous but sinners” (Lk 5:31-32).

In healing the leper, Jesus does not harm the healthy. Rather, he frees them from fear. He does not endanger them, but gives them a brother. He does not devalue the law but instead values those for whom God gave the law. Indeed, Jesus frees the healthy from the temptation of the “older brother” (cf. Lk 15:11-32), the burden of envy and the grumbling of the labourers who bore “the burden of the day and the heat” (cf. Mt 20:1-16).

In a word: charity cannot be neutral, antiseptic, indifferent, lukewarm or impartial! Charity is infectious, it excites, it risks and it engages! For true charity is always unmerited, unconditional and gratuitous! (cf. 1 Cor 13). Charity is creative in finding the right words to speak to all those considered incurable and hence untouchable. Finding the right words… Contact is the language of genuine communication, the same endearing language which brought healing to the leper. How many healings can we perform if only we learn this language of contact! The leper, once cured, became a messenger of God’s love. The Gospel tells us that “he went out and began to proclaim it freely and to spread the word” (cf. Mk 1:45).

Dear new Cardinals, this is the “logic”, the mind of Jesus, and this is the way of the Church. Not only to welcome and reinstate with evangelical courage all those who knock at our door, but to go out and seek, fearlessly and without prejudice, those who are distant, freely sharing what we ourselves freely received. “Whoever says: ‘I abide in [Christ]’, ought to walk just as he walked” (1 Jn 2:6). Total openness to serving others is our hallmark, it alone is our title of honour!

Consider carefully that, in these days when you have become Cardinals, we have asked Mary, Mother of the Church, who herself experienced marginalization as a result of slander (cf. Jn 8:41) and exile (cf. Mt 2:13-23), to intercede for us so that we can be God’s faithful servants. May she - our Mother - teach us to be unafraid of tenderly welcoming the outcast; not to be afraid of tenderness. How often we fear tenderness! May Mary teach us not to be afraid of tenderness and compassion. May she clothe us in patience as we seek to accompany them on their journey, without seeking the benefits of worldly success. May she show us Jesus and help us to walk in his footsteps.

Dear new Cardinals, my brothers, as we look to Jesus and our Mother, I urge you to serve the Church in such a way that Christians - edified by our witness - will not be tempted to turn to Jesus without turning to the outcast, to become a closed caste with nothing authentically ecclesial about it. I urge you to serve Jesus crucified in every person who is emarginated, for whatever reason; to see the Lord in every excluded person who is hungry, thirsty, naked; to see the Lord present even in those who have lost their faith, or turned away from the practice of their faith, or say that they are atheists; to see the Lord who is imprisoned, sick, unemployed, persecuted; to see the Lord in the leper – whether in body or soul - who encounters discrimination! We will not find the Lord unless we truly accept the marginalized! May we always have before us the image of Saint Francis, who was unafraid to embrace the leper and to accept every kind of outcast. Truly, dear brothers, the Gospel of the marginalized is where our credibility is at stake, is discovered and is revealed!
More BS for the gullible Cartoonist Feb 2015 #1
Are you comparing homosexality to leprosy? rug Feb 2015 #8
You are Cartoonist Feb 2015 #20
Those are your words, Cartoonist. Own them. rug Feb 2015 #21
You own them Cartoonist Feb 2015 #31
Bullshit. It's your comparison. The sermon was about leprosy, not "fishes and loaves". rug Feb 2015 #36
Cartoonist's post was about the superpope's two-facedness. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #37
Have you appointed yourself interpreter of awkward posts? rug Feb 2015 #38
Just trying to help because you obviously missed it. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #40
Help the next poster who brings up homosexuality in a thread about leprosy. rug Feb 2015 #41
Look REAL HARD at the subject line. I'll wait. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #42
It wasn't abot gay people either. rug Feb 2015 #46
PREJUDICED MENTALITY. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #47
There are all kinds of PREJDICED MENTALITY !!1!!1! rug Feb 2015 #48
I read it. That's why your attempt to deflect on the homosexuality issue with 'lepers' is pathetic. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #49
Is that a promise? rug Feb 2015 #50
It is. That issue was a valid topic of the article. You smeared him with that comparison. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #51
You just broke it. rug Feb 2015 #52
Nope. You had your chance. Goodbye. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #53
Adieu. rug Feb 2015 #54
I' sure you're absolutely crushed. okasha Feb 2015 #63
. . . . it is a far, far better rest that I go to than I have ever known . . . . rug Feb 2015 #67
This message was self-deleted by its author Cartoonist Feb 2015 #43
The Opinion Post speaks of "all" who are marginalized by the Church Brettongarcia Feb 2015 #85
This Pope reminds me very much of President Obama. Htom Sirveaux Feb 2015 #2
Interesting analysis. cbayer Feb 2015 #6
I disagree--so far, Francis is proving to be the more inspiring leader DerekG Feb 2015 #45
What's always bothered me bvf Feb 2015 #3
What's always bothered ME Cartoonist Feb 2015 #4
Depends on what "Son of God" means, doesn't it? Htom Sirveaux Feb 2015 #5
That would have been asking for bvf Feb 2015 #32
I don't know the answer to your question, but it reminds me of something I've wondered. merrily Feb 2015 #55
Here's some nonsense for you Cartoonist Feb 2015 #57
What do you think that statement means? cbayer Feb 2015 #58
A possible claim of deity, yes. merrily Feb 2015 #59
The most logical explanation seems to be that he is cbayer Feb 2015 #60
I don't know. I know only that there is more than one possible interpretation. merrily Feb 2015 #62
Good points. That is why I find literalism so very objectionable. cbayer Feb 2015 #64
Point was, one is not supposed to converse in a library. merrily Feb 2015 #65
Well, I like the quiet as well, but all that paper makes me sneeze. cbayer Feb 2015 #66
I think he may well have been preaching, in context, a sense of universality. "I am the son of man" pinto Feb 2015 #61
If one takes these stories literally, then I can see why one cbayer Feb 2015 #10
What a ridiculous question. bvf Feb 2015 #11
But are you one of them, because many millions don't. cbayer Feb 2015 #12
Do you think Santa Claus bvf Feb 2015 #13
What's always bothered me cbayer Feb 2015 #14
Do you believe in Santa Claus? bvf Feb 2015 #16
No, do you? cbayer Feb 2015 #17
For your edification. bvf Feb 2015 #23
Yes, dear bvf. I was mocking your response to make a point. cbayer Feb 2015 #24
You just can't keep true to your word, can you? bvf Feb 2015 #25
Of course I can't! You've read the book, I am sure. cbayer Feb 2015 #26
Repeat as necessary. bvf Feb 2015 #33
Obviously okasha Feb 2015 #18
Literalists are killing us... cbayer Feb 2015 #19
Why take anything in the bible literally then? Major Nikon Feb 2015 #75
Why indeed? cbayer Feb 2015 #78
I reckon there's lots of reasons Major Nikon Feb 2015 #80
Not necessary for you to put any stock in them at all. cbayer Feb 2015 #81
You are correct Major Nikon Feb 2015 #82
If fundies believe in talking donkeys and people that live to 900, cbayer Feb 2015 #83
He was speaking about today's Gospel. rug Feb 2015 #7
jesus had the cure and chose not to give it away freely in the name of love...or any other reason nt msongs Feb 2015 #9
Do you know of any incident in the New Testament where he refused anyone? rug Feb 2015 #15
As if the New Testament is a reliable source? phil89 Feb 2015 #27
So, the answer is "no". rug Feb 2015 #28
Way to miss the point. phil89 Feb 2015 #76
the New Testament is a reliable as any documents prior to the Linen paper happyslug Feb 2015 #34
Wrong. okasha Feb 2015 #22
And, it did nothing. AtheistCrusader Feb 2015 #39
For Jesus did NOT want to be known for his miracles but for his message. happyslug Feb 2015 #29
His messages phil89 Feb 2015 #77
Feel free to ignore all of them. cbayer Feb 2015 #79
Here is the whole Homily, it is to the New Cardinals of the Church. happyslug Feb 2015 #30
"must be open and welcoming, whatever the cost"? skepticscott Feb 2015 #35
Two words: Greg Burke. n/t. bvf Feb 2015 #44
What has a National League Pitcher have to do with this thread? happyslug Feb 2015 #71
Seriously. bvf Feb 2015 #72
Some of us get our news from the net, and the ball player came up first happyslug Feb 2015 #73
When I plugged "Greg Burke" into Google, it returned the journalist first. n/t trotsky Feb 2015 #74
Good talk. bvf Feb 2015 #84
What was this Pope doing in Slovakia? No seriously, he's directly contradicting himself here... Humanist_Activist Feb 2015 #56
He wasn't in Slovakia. okasha Feb 2015 #68
Good point, but I was talking about his endorsement of the failed... Humanist_Activist Feb 2015 #69
You'll find there won't be many takers on that subject. trotsky Feb 2015 #70
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Pope Francis Slams 'Preju...»Reply #30