Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Brettongarcia

(2,262 posts)
30. The big new category of religious belief: "none." Meaning? Maybe: "no religious belief"?
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 02:04 PM
Feb 2012

The framing and then interpretation of statistical surveys, is infinitely complex. And not always disinterested. Consider this case.

There are two or three possible meanings for this category of "none"s: 1) those who are Christian, who believe, but have no particular church affiliation or denomination (Baptist, Catholic, Episcopal, etc.) Or 2) those with some vague religious leanings ... but who not only do not claim any particular Christian denomination, but claim no particular religion - i.e. Buddhism, Christianity, Judaism, Mithraism - at all. Or it might mean, to many respondents ,3) persons with no religion; none at all.

The survey MAY have tried to specify which; or may not have. Or may have specified ... but in fine print, that respondents ignored.

However? The general sense of the "none"s as they are now called? Is that they are at best vaguely religious; with no specific affiliation. And are very close to say ... agnostics.

By the way? There are many, many interested religious parties working successfully, to control PEW. And then to frame and interpret the PEW questionaires and data. I have not found PEW entirely reliable in the past. See readers' comments on PEW results on say church attendance, in journals like First Things.

When looking at stats in general? When listing to people allegedly proving things with numbers? Always remember a few famous, cautionary quotes: "Figures don't lie ... but liars can figure." Or remember Disraeli condemning, in order of awfulness: "Lies, damn lies, and statistics."

Its hard to get any good statistics; PEW is only fair at best. But my sense of the state of religion in the US, from my viewpoint here on groundlevel, is that those of very weak or "no" religious affiliation ... are increasing. Rapidly.

Last figure I heard - was that about 10% of the US population would now be considered atheist (1%) or agnostic (9%).

why don't your probabilities add up to 1? Enrique Feb 2012 #1
0 and non-0? Etc. Brettongarcia Feb 2012 #6
"Nothing is absolute" lastlib Feb 2012 #13
I made an arithmetical error. Boojatta Feb 2012 #7
Because half of 36 is actually 18, not 16 n/t dimbear Feb 2012 #9
LOL-- now there's where religion and science really CAN compromise.... mike_c Feb 2012 #2
No, more like agnostic: 'I'll believe it when I see it.' elleng Feb 2012 #3
You'd probably be an agnostic in such a case LeftishBrit Feb 2012 #4
The Red exist on the wheel edhopper Feb 2012 #5
But if it is always red, and black, then they blur together ... into purple Brettongarcia Feb 2012 #8
No they would be edhopper Feb 2012 #10
Maroon! immoderate Feb 2012 #11
*Sigh!* First, how do you get red/black = purple? Red and Blue = Purple... Moonwalk Feb 2012 #12
But? What if you leave the roulette wheel ... and discover a whole new "game"? Brettongarcia Feb 2012 #14
The question was whether one is an atheist if one believes in a certain probability of... Moonwalk Feb 2012 #23
Just to add to this...the idea of "God" is that he's everywhere and in everything.... Moonwalk Feb 2012 #27
Is this person a TAP or a PAP agnostic? NAO Feb 2012 #15
Penultimate Number in LOST; also "42" is the answer to "Life, the Universe, and Everything" NAO Feb 2012 #16
Which god?? Angry Dragon Feb 2012 #17
Good question. Good objection to the "argument from Design" Brettongarcia Feb 2012 #18
I should revise my original question. Boojatta Feb 2012 #19
Probabilities are meaningless dmallind Feb 2012 #20
Are the propabilistic tama Feb 2012 #24
Suppose that you believe god exists with probability of one, but specific gods with less than one FarCenter Feb 2012 #22
Yes. ZombieHorde Feb 2012 #21
Or? Has atheist Facebook friends. Brettongarcia Feb 2012 #25
I just read something yesterday (and I think it was from Pew) that, in terms cbayer Feb 2012 #26
Could be new data. Or? A different analytic model; but for "those of weak faith: welcome!" Brettongarcia Feb 2012 #28
Here it is. I saw it in this Washington Post article, but they don't source it. cbayer Feb 2012 #29
The big new category of religious belief: "none." Meaning? Maybe: "no religious belief"? Brettongarcia Feb 2012 #30
Believing in a probability of god does not an atheist make. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Are you an atheist if you...»Reply #30