Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MicaelS

(8,747 posts)
29. It's a term used in a DELIBERATELY pejorative manner
Sat Jan 7, 2012, 10:45 AM
Jan 2012

Last edited Sat Jan 7, 2012, 11:15 AM - Edit history (1)

To disparage those exercising, or attempting their Right to Bear Arms.

"Tote" and "toter" started being used by a certain member to express that member's absolute contempt for anyone who legally carries a concealed weapon.

Just like the term "Militant" is used in a deliberately pejorative manner on both the Left and the Right to disparage those seeking to exercise their Freedoms.

"Gun Militant" is another term used by certain members to express their contempt for those who try to exercise and expand the RKBA.

"Militant" or "Militants" is used by Right Wingers in connection with the terms "Free Speech", "Atheist", "Homosexual", "Abortion", "Feminist" to disparage those seeking to exercise their Freedoms.

Since you are not a new member and have debated others on the issue of the RKBA before, your original post is deliberately disingenuous.

You want to use a term? Use "CCW". That is a simple shorthand everyone knows what you're speaking of.

How about the word "grab" or "grabber"? Common Sense Party Jan 2012 #1
Huh? Since when did grab mean tote? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #3
Huh? When did I say it did? Common Sense Party Jan 2012 #4
Why wouldn't I be? What does it have to do with the OP? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #5
I think the word 'tote' has a negative connotation: like 'lug', petronius Jan 2012 #2
I see no negative connotation with the word "tote" Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #6
You asked a question, and I answered it. And despite your transparent disingenuousness petronius Jan 2012 #7
If you can demonstrate how the word is, in any way, offensive, I shall be happy to defer Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #8
Again: you asked a question, I assumed you were sincere, so I answered it petronius Jan 2012 #9
There is a poster here who has repeatedly linked the word to a variety of negative conotations.... PavePusher Jan 2012 #42
No, sorry. Toter is a word used by many toters. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #46
No, "toter" is a word used by the anti-gun folks. ManiacJoe Jan 2012 #55
"It is used by Hoyt as a slur" iverglas Jan 2012 #64
Educate yourself on Hoyt and "toter" by ManiacJoe Jan 2012 #79
read what I said and reply to it iverglas Jan 2012 #91
What part has left you confused? ManiacJoe Jan 2012 #103
You are arguing with the Jello. Don't waste your time. n/t PavePusher Jan 2012 #164
Really? Better tell these guys. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #70
I have never heard one person who has a concealed weapons permit... spin Jan 2012 #68
I'm relieved that it doesn't bother you Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #71
I have never heard of either company... spin Jan 2012 #120
Does the fact you haven't heard of them invalidate them in some way? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #127
No as I said the term "toter" doesn't bother me in the least... spin Jan 2012 #135
Now cops in Fla. are using armed citizens as backups? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #194
Did you read the entire post? We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #195
Lighten up there WHAP Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #198
It would be easier... We_Have_A_Problem Jan 2012 #199
Ah, but not on a Monday morning. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #200
I'm sure this was a rare incident in a small town... spin Jan 2012 #196
I know. Just couldn't help myself. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #197
I once witnessed an accident... spin Jan 2012 #201
and the N word is a word used by many N people. Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #192
Enjoy your experience on DU Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #193
I was simply pointing out that just because some people use a word without rancor, does not mean Wistful Vista Jan 2012 #202
Really? And who would "N" people be? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #203
I'm plumb tuckered out from totin' my shootin' iron all over tarnation. Straw Man Jan 2012 #10
I think the majority of DUers have a much harsher view of people who carry/tote/strap-on, etc. Hoyt Jan 2012 #34
Do you have any proof to back up your "suspicions"? Common Sense Party Jan 2012 #35
Yes. Hoyt Jan 2012 #44
So, no. Got it. Common Sense Party Jan 2012 #63
You took an off ramp by mistak there dude. Jump back on at the next exit. nt rrneck Jan 2012 #37
good lord Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #62
Not a myth at all. Hoyt Jan 2012 #84
if you say so -- -- Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #94
Hoyt - you are absolutely correct. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #75
I stumbled in here as well and was disappointed to see folks promoting more guns. Hoyt Jan 2012 #88
wtf Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #96
I said that I wish more Democrats like Starboard Tack posted about would come here. Hoyt Jan 2012 #110
no that is not what you said. You have rephrased it in your subjectline. As for the rest of your Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #112
I responded to S Tack, so holster your gun. Hoyt Jan 2012 #113
you replied on a public message board for all to read and reply to as they see fit Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #115
It was weird the first time in here to see Democrats spewing all the same right-wing... DanTex Jan 2012 #102
Exactly. Well said. Hoyt Jan 2012 #108
respectfully, I disagree. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #116
That has not been my experience, and I respectfully disagree gejohnston Jan 2012 #124
Just to be clear, you're accusing me of "detest(ing) working class and rural Americans". DanTex Jan 2012 #173
when they read between the lines gejohnston Jan 2012 #179
Very well said Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #137
It's incredible... ellisonz Jan 2012 #139
As a church/state separation near absolutist, gejohnston Jan 2012 #150
To the best of my knowledge... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #175
I agree Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #169
I notice some dichotomy between your points. mvccd1000 Jan 2012 #157
I know. Makes you wonder, doesn't it? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #168
By all means, go back and dig up the results of the survey in General Discussion. AtheistCrusader Jan 2012 #161
Post #42 confirmed. Thanks for your assistance. n/t PavePusher Jan 2012 #165
I love NWA. And the airline as well. Isn't term-rehab wonderful? nt SteveW Jan 2012 #180
How about "packer" - that's pretty innoucuous. ellisonz Jan 2012 #11
How about carrier? It seems to be what those who actually do it prefer... petronius Jan 2012 #12
Only with a couple conditions... ellisonz Jan 2012 #13
A deal? You misunderstand my purpose in this thread: as I told ST above I don't petronius Jan 2012 #17
Since some seem to take it as an offense...I'm offering compromise. ellisonz Jan 2012 #19
If you need deals and compromises in order to show courtesy, I'd conclude petronius Jan 2012 #21
There are levels of civility. ellisonz Jan 2012 #23
this is your appeal for civility ?! Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #56
For disagreeing with a failing gun control policy... ellisonz Jan 2012 #129
this thread is about discussing policy civilly with fellow DUers. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #131
And I'm talking about... ellisonz Jan 2012 #138
I realize that I am being hyperbolic in this thread in order to make my point. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #140
That's not hyperbolic, that's disrespect. ellisonz Jan 2012 #142
the OP was disrespectful from the start. good night. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #145
LOL. What do you expect from a [g-worder]? nt SteveW Jan 2012 #181
The word is "grabber." He doesn't mind it at all. Common Sense Party Jan 2012 #182
actually, I don't think ellisonz needs anything iverglas Jan 2012 #67
And I would say that your response demonstrates a failure to understand petronius Jan 2012 #118
your smiley failed ;) iverglas Jan 2012 #65
That shit is annoying. n/t ellisonz Jan 2012 #130
Carrier is more apt for an airline or a pigeon Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #47
You clearly have no interest in settling this. Union Scribe Jan 2012 #49
I grew up raising carrier pigeons Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #53
I have nothing to settle. I have made my position clear. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #149
haha iverglas Jan 2012 #69
Thanks gejohnston Jan 2012 #119
Happy to help. Did you check out the Toter Jeans too? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #122
If I actually get a pocket pistol I may. gejohnston Jan 2012 #126
Exactly. That is the word. Union Scribe Jan 2012 #48
Innocuous? I ask you... Straw Man Jan 2012 #14
So you're conceeding it's in common use? n/t ellisonz Jan 2012 #15
Well, it was in 1943, anyway. Straw Man Jan 2012 #16
AP is still using it. ellisonz Jan 2012 #18
AP headlines aren't good models of usage. Straw Man Jan 2012 #20
"You do see the irony here, don't you?" ellisonz Jan 2012 #22
Threatening people with language is uncivil Union Scribe Jan 2012 #51
+1 Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #99
I really should make a list of all the nastiness that's been directed towards me in this forum... ellisonz Jan 2012 #133
That might start a bunch of shit with some football fans. rrneck Jan 2012 #38
yeah, if this is Green Bay... Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #98
Green bay Packers? rl6214 Jan 2012 #141
Common use one-eyed fat man Jan 2012 #24
Stop being obtuse. ileus Jan 2012 #25
hey, I like that one: "rotten fuckass toter" Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #58
I don't find it insulting in the least, and I are one. mvccd1000 Jan 2012 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author ileus Jan 2012 #27
Congratulations! Someone who understands English. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #39
with the way you are reasoning this Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #117
death spewer toter.... ileus Jan 2012 #28
meh Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #59
That's Imah totin' ileus Jan 2012 #107
Imah so sorry. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #111
It's a term used in a DELIBERATELY pejorative manner MicaelS Jan 2012 #29
I'm glad you like it Fredjust Jan 2012 #31
You're a rude toter aren't you. ileus Jan 2012 #32
"Gun militant"... DanTex Jan 2012 #54
if and when Wayne or Mike or that other guy post in this group feel free to use it on them Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #60
And also, I'm going to keep "using it on them" even if they don't post here. DanTex Jan 2012 #82
as long you make the reference clear and don't use it on your fellow good and proper DUers. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #85
oooh, it's moi! iverglas Jan 2012 #78
Well said rl6214 Jan 2012 #144
the word does not offend me but, out of respect of my fellow DUers who are offended Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #30
How about "schlep"? JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2012 #33
Schlep is OK, but has the connotation of it being tiresome. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #40
No matter, I usually use the word "carry" JustABozoOnThisBus Jan 2012 #76
Just like every other word it depends on how you use it. rrneck Jan 2012 #36
I accept responsibility for using the word Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #41
You accept responsibility for its use, but not for its intent. rrneck Jan 2012 #45
And it's intent. How you interpret is up to you. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #52
No, you're not sorry. rrneck Jan 2012 #57
excellent post, rrneck Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #61
You are correct. I am not sorry. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #66
I guess you had a little trouble reading there. rrneck Jan 2012 #74
Sorry, but I'm not sorry I was sorry about being sorry. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #77
That's what I thought. rrneck Jan 2012 #80
You couldn't be more correct. I'm so sorry. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #86
Prove you're sorry. nt rrneck Jan 2012 #89
Prove I'm not. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #97
Sorry, can't prove a negative. rrneck Jan 2012 #104
OK I'm back and glad to know you don't have aproblem with the word "toter" Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #143
If you don't like unsubstantiated insults rrneck Jan 2012 #148
No personal insults intended. No evasion either. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #151
More plauseable deniability. We'll see. nt rrneck Jan 2012 #152
not a thing, grabber. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #90
LOL! rrneck Jan 2012 #95
you were sorry about being sorry but, now you are not because Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #87
Some people just don't know rrneck Jan 2012 #92
I don't think you are as mean spirited as you like to appear. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #146
I am as mean spirited as I need to be. rrneck Jan 2012 #147
That's your choice and your opinion Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #154
Anybody that reads this thread rrneck Jan 2012 #156
I'm sure you are right Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #170
Damn. Sorry about the confusion Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #100
don't worry Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #101
Gah! rrneck Jan 2012 #105
Ha! Well, I guess we see gun-g------s coming back in? "Sorry." nt SteveW Jan 2012 #183
It is pretty obvious you're not the least bit sorry MicaelS Jan 2012 #81
Of course I'm not sorry. Are you serious? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #121
Well said, spot on. ileus Jan 2012 #109
To quote a former member: "What a steaming pantload." beevul Jan 2012 #83
Which poster are you referring to? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #93
google it at site:DU iverglas Jan 2012 #106
Ask and you shall receive. beevul Jan 2012 #114
"tote" has the connotation of carrying something heavy and/or awkward. krispos42 Jan 2012 #43
Interesting. Where do you get the heavy/awkward thing from? Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #50
Wikipedia, which I believe reflects current usage. krispos42 Jan 2012 #123
Good point. Maybe guns used to be heavier. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #128
Haven't you repeatedly claimed that you owned no firearms? n/t oneshooter Jan 2012 #136
I personally... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #72
I don't mind any which way. Remmah2 Jan 2012 #73
Boy howdy, this thread really cleared the air. rrneck Jan 2012 #125
oh lord Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #134
Spot-on, and wonderfully eloquent to boot!! NT Simo 1939_1940 Jan 2012 #158
Wonderful summary of desiring a (concealed) license to murder-mouth. nt SteveW Jan 2012 #184
In response to my comment about the word "tote" rl6214 Jan 2012 #132
Fair enough. No toters. No grabbers or packers from now on. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #153
No need to go overboard. rrneck Jan 2012 #162
Oh alright. As long as we're all still friends. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #167
You would not think so if you had known me a few years ago. oneshooter Jan 2012 #174
I'll own up to misinterpretations and some mean comments from time to time Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #176
FWIW... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #177
Back atcha! Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #178
Proud toter reporting in. Pacafishmate Jan 2012 #155
Welcome to DU! rrneck Jan 2012 #166
Some of you toters/carriers/CCWers/packers need to get thicker skins. mvccd1000 Jan 2012 #159
Bullshit. AtheistCrusader Jan 2012 #160
Haven't you heard. I have conceded and will no longer use that awful word. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #171
Any group sufficiently large, interactive, and historically cumulative will develop its own culture. X_Digger Jan 2012 #163
Believe it or not I didn't steal from or copy Hoyt Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #172
you might be interested in what is going on elsewhere in DU regarding words and meaning Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #185
Yeah, I've been reading those threads. Very interesting. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #187
thanks. weird, how stuff bothers some people and not others. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #189
So does this mean I can't say rude toter anymore? ??? ileus Jan 2012 #186
You can say whatever you like. It's your choice. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #188
Thanks everyone for your input. I really appreciate it. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #190
While I feel that "rude toter" is a bit abrasive ObamaFTW2012 Jan 2012 #191
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»OK everyone, let's clear ...»Reply #29