Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: We need a Pro-RKBA group on DU [View all]rDigital
(2,239 posts)238. BTW, you are so wrong it hurts.
http://hr.colorado.edu/Pages/ColoradoConcealedCarryAct.aspx
Can an employee bring a concealed weapon to the office?
Yes, if the employee has a valid concealed carry permit and the weapon is carried in accordance with the law, i.e., concealed.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
337 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ahhh, the projection: the #1 "Google dumper" right now in the Gungeon has 26 OP's going
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#10
You don't know how to scroll up and down through the first page of the forum?
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#48
So, you still haven't figured out how your computer's mouse works. That must be tough. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#81
Figure out how to manipulate your computer's mouse, then get back with me. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#93
Still haven't figured it out yet, huh? Must be tough. Keep trying - practice makes perfect.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#98
Still haven't got the hang of it, eh? That really turning out to be a toughie. Keep trying!
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#104
Practice makes perfect: give it another go. Sometimes, it just takes patience and perseverance.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#109
See, you figured out how to use the "search" function on DU, so the computer mouse can't be
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#110
What do you want to discuss? Figure that out first, then get back with me. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#115
Still waiting: What. Do. You. Want. To. Discuss? "Running and hiding," indeed....
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#117
So, you don't want to discuss anything after all, eh? Figures. Get back with me when you do. n/t
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#121
No, the issue at hand is that the biggest "Google dumper" on this forum is a "pro gun progressive,"
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#136
Still haven't got the hang of how that mouse on your computer works yet, huh?
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#143
Wow, you must have the same trouble scrolling up and down with a mouse that your pal does.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#149
Nope: asked & answered. Now, either ask some new ones, or go find something else to discuss. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#151
Yep, plenty of facts, you've simply ignored them. But thanks for giving me the opportunity to kick
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#161
Yep, I have. And it's been quite thoroughly documented & linked. Give it a try:
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#163
Yep. He just never could grasp the simple mechanics of maniuplating his mouse, or clicking a link
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#190
Yeah, I can just imagine the manly RKBA'er at his desk, shootin' iron strapped to his hip,
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#6
Yep. One of our "pro gun progressives" rigged up a way he could take his deadly toy to the shower
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#11
That's a pretty cool stow-bag for that AR-15 variant, actually. Like the collapsible stock, too.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#49
Also, one of our "pro-RKBA" Democrats won't even hazard posting on DU without his trusty Glock
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#14
It doesn't bother me in the least: I just think people who do such things are insane, paranoid,
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#90
The same could be said of people who call guns "deadly little Phallic Replacement Devices"
MercutioATC
Sep 2012
#102
1. There is no "Constitutional rights" to tote weaponry around in public. 2. If that guy in the
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#105
Do you honestly think that a person who goes to the trouble to rig up a waterproof gun bag
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#140
You swerved off the issue: I got you back on it. So, you DO believe someone who showers
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#180
Hey, it was a "pro gun progressive" talking other such specimens, not to some "anti."
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#219
I'm a member on more than a few gun forums and believe me there is A LOT to disagree on
rDigital
Sep 2012
#39
Looks like even your fellow RKBA'ers don't feel the need for a "safe haven" from the
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#17
"Those who support the RKBA are harassed and intimidated"! You meant that as a joke --
jody
Sep 2012
#18
I said "Republican AND conservative nut-jobs." Zimmerman is clearly a conservative nut-job
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#37
So, we got us a George Zimmerman supporter here. That's interesting - though not surprising.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#46
Yep: you are for lynch mobs and vigilante "justice" and it's duly noted. n/t
gejohnston
Sep 2012
#88
I'm sure Zimmerman is comforted by the fact that "pro gun progressives" are in his corner...
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#91
Yes you do, or else we wouldn't be having this conversation. Have you given to Zimmerman's defense
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#100
We are having this conversation because you support George Zimmerman. Period. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#106
Kos There's an informal rule over at Daily Kos that neds to adopted here at D.U....
PavePusher
Sep 2012
#168
Well it was worth a try. I guess the main take away is that something needs to be done about
rDigital
Sep 2012
#22
Kind of off-topic for this thread, but it's not actually "gun people" posting
petronius
Sep 2012
#30
So where does GD come into it, and how does this agenda you perceive affect GD? (nt)
petronius
Sep 2012
#64
Perhaps you have missed the posts and threads where some are calling for
ProgressiveProfessor
Sep 2012
#63
Sometimes flame wars bring out the worse and it has happened here too many times.
glacierbay
Sep 2012
#69
Toting weaponry around in public spoiling for a shootout has nothing to do with the progressive
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#89
"Gun people have an agenda" but it's not a problem. We are committed to preserving all natural,
jody
Sep 2012
#44
Your comment re patriot implies either you haven't read or don't understand PA & VT constitutions of
jody
Sep 2012
#73
I voted yes, however.com with truth and a true progressive stance most arguments against are moot.
ileus
Sep 2012
#29
"something needs to be done about the malicious posters" - You mean posters who disagree with you.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#47
Uhhh...WRONG. We have no problem with posters who disagree with the 2nd Amendment.
Common Sense Party
Sep 2012
#79
Nope: right. DU TOS states: "Democratic Underground is an online community for
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#83
Since you had difficulty the first go round: DU TOS states "Democratic Underground is an online
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#92
The only one wilfullllly misreading and misconstruing the Constitution is you, Sparky.
Common Sense Party
Sep 2012
#120
Since difficulties remain, we'll try again: DU TOS states "Democratic Underground is an online
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#122
We'll try it again: DU TOS states "Democratic Underground is an online community
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#128
You're bullying people right here in the post were I am asking for a new forum because of bullies.
rDigital
Sep 2012
#159
It is the tactics of those unable to otherwise defend their point of view
ProgressiveProfessor
Sep 2012
#166
Posting facts the "pro gun progressives" refuse to answer or refute isn't "bullying," Digit:
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#176
That's what I don't get, never have: why bring the NRA and GOP agenda to DU?
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#95
Exactly right - that's all it is. A few years back, a mutual friend of ours PM'd me a link to a gun
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#124
I'm not "confused" in the slightest, "Professor." Tell us: what was your dissertation concerning?
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#125
So, you are refusing to provide evidence to substantiate your credentials.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#144
As has been said many times before, "On the internet, no one knows you are a dog"
ProgressiveProfessor
Sep 2012
#146
You claim to be some kind of "professor," yet refuse to provide any substantiation to
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#157
Yes, the onus is precisely on you to provide proof of your "bonafides" - you are the one
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#167
Where have I cited my $DAYJOB to give weight to my posts in this group?
ProgressiveProfessor
Sep 2012
#170
To "out" you? Are you ashamed of having once been a "professor"? Would you suffer
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#171
Either provide the substantiaton to back up your claim, or cease making the claim.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#178
Are you going to provide substantiation for your dubious claim, or cease making the claim?
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#183
I am still waiting for you to substantiate that I cite $DAYJOB to give my posts authority in
ProgressiveProfessor
Sep 2012
#192
Are you going to provide substantiation for you dubious claim, or cease making the claim?
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#195
"Being a prof is my retirement job" - Uh-huh. Do you post on DU from campus? n/t.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#184
Uh-huh. Riiiiiiggghhhttt.....in any event, I only ask because even a brief perusal of the Gungeon
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#202
Of course you don't: you're not a professor, conduct no lectures nor participate in any labs,
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#216
Uh-huh. Busted on bogus claims, and still trying to salvage a scrap of credibility. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#223
You made the bogus claim, and have for YEARS: now, the consequences of posting
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#227
The claim IS bogus, as shown. But feel free to post any substantiating evidence you wish...
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#237
Plus, you've just busted yourself by claiming you pack heat as an employee on a campus
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#217
Coy will not salvage your credibility: you've been busted. You are not a "professor."
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#225
As you like...but there are several exceptions that you have still not found
ProgressiveProfessor
Sep 2012
#231
It will be as I like, as what has been demonstrated here this evening is (1) irrefutable and
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#235
Just because you cannot figure out how the pieces fit does not mean they do not fit
ProgressiveProfessor
Sep 2012
#243
You claim to be in California: is so, you're not packing on campus. Unless you're campus police.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#256
BTW, I don't think the DU admins look kindly upon posters who use proxies.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#203
I assume you're either going to provide proof to substantiate your claim - now busted (see below) -
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#207
Like I said: kinda stepped in this one, didn't yah? Might wanna rethink this "professor" claim. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#214
I'm sorry that you have to deal with these personal attacks, this was one of the
rDigital
Sep 2012
#158
You cannot be a black man in the US without developing a thick skin when it comes to idiots.
ProgressiveProfessor
Sep 2012
#165
Keep up the good work. Education is a powerful construct and fosters life long rewarding
rDigital
Sep 2012
#172
Actually, you don't. Even the Utah and Colorado exceptions apply only to students, not to employees.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#188
No, there are not. Of the five states that currently allow STUDENTS to pack heat
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#194
In other words, you've been busted on your bogus claim, and are now trying salvage some credibility.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#201
Yes, I've found the right one: there is not a single campus that allows employees, as opposed to
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#206
Kinda stepped in this one, didn't yah? Like I said: might wanna rethink this "professor" claim.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#197
And now the self-deletions from even your *allies* start, as some of them begin to realize just how
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#222
Are you going to cease making the "professor" claim, now that it's been definitively shown you are
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#230
Take it however you wish: the fact remains, by your own errant post, posted before
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#234
Why are you bullying in my anti-bullying thread? It's disgusting. Discuss the issues, we are all
rDigital
Sep 2012
#236
Posting facts the "pro gun progressives" refuse to answer or refute isn't "bullying," Digit:
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#239
Posting facts the "pro gun progressives" refuse to answer or refute isn't "bullying," Digit:
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#246
Calm yourself, Digit: I win, actually. The "professor" claims to teach in California, and there is
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#263
Nope: I won it. It took hours, but our "professor" now says he's in CA. He's not packing heat there,
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#259
Except, the answer is bogus. You no more had any idea what the policy was until Digit posted
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#248
Focus, Digit: California is the state we're talking about, not Texas. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#264
I don't know: why wouldn't there be? You're the one asking the question.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#266
I "implied" no such thing. I was reiterating the claims our "professor" has made about himself,
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#281
Where do you "teach," "professor"? We can clear all this up right now. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#311
The law in "CA" - so, you're not a professor after all, by your own admission.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#252
No, I have a perfect answer, actually: your claims to "professorship," by your OWN ADMISSION,
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#265
So, you claim you have written permission to carry a gun on a California campus?
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#302
Addendum to #248: by your own admission, you are not a professor. You claim to be a "prof" in CA,
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#267
Edit: looks like that's irrelevant. Our "professor" now claims to be in California,
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#245
You can also carry in the state Washington if the college doesn't prohibit carry. nt
rDigital
Sep 2012
#253
You can openly carry a firearm at any public college in Ohio. Concealed is banned by statute.
rDigital
Sep 2012
#255
Focus, Digit: the "professor" now states he's teaching in California. Not Ohio. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#260
No, you cannot: that provision does not apply to EMPLOYEES, for starters, and for seconders
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#270
What's "for shame" is you keep posting falsehoods about concealed carry on CA campuses:
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#276
You just confirmed what I said, and then claimed I had "nothing." Funny stuff.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#279
The school is free to make their own rules. No state law banning it. YOU LOSE.
rDigital
Sep 2012
#280
No, you cannot. As shown. Simply repeating the same thing over and over doesn't make it so. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#290
The Professor HAS WRITTEN PERMISSION. His "exception". You lose, quit bullying in my thread. nt
rDigital
Sep 2012
#299
He has never stated he had "WRITTEN PERMISSION," and he doesn't in any event since he's not a "prof"
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#306
Nope, quite the opposite. He has never stated he has written permission, and he doesn't, and
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#304
I don't think there's anything "dark" or "evil" about it: I just think these "professor" and
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#315
Nope: he stepped in it. He claimed he toted a firearm around campus, and this has been shown to be
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#309
I know it can be hard to admit when you are wrong, but you are so embarassingly wrong
rDigital
Sep 2012
#314
It hasn't been "refuted" as there is no one packing heat on CA campuses unless they're cops, retired
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#313
If he wants to make claims on a public discussion board and retain any credibility he does.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#319
NO one is going to tell you where they work. This conversation is academic at best,
rDigital
Sep 2012
#320
No, it's not "academic": make claims on a discussion board, either back them up or quit making them.
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#324
"if the Prof speaks the truth." - Hinges on that, doesn't it? He could clear it up in a second,
apocalypsehow
Sep 2012
#321
ah padawan, you have to know the reference before you police the word.
Warren Stupidity
Sep 2012
#78
Well, it looks like I've lost this one in the poll, but in reality... I have won.
rDigital
Sep 2012
#199