Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: A simple question to those who carry for self-defense. [View all]gejohnston
(17,502 posts)9. no
because the DP sets out to kill someone. Self Defense does not. You fire to stop, not to kill. that is a difference. You realize, by saying what you are, you are putting a higher value on the attacker than the defender. If no, it is certainly perceived as such by most people in the world. That is why people who have disdain for those who defend themselves, are marginalized even in DU.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If your assailant is determined to kill you with fists, teeth and fingernails,
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2012
#17
"shooting a person and aiming at center mass to STOP them is more than likely going to kill them"
PavePusher
Jul 2012
#31
Your goal may well be to stop the aggression, but there are consequences.
Starboard Tack
Jul 2012
#37
UK, unarmed, as we all were at the time, barring specialized sharpshooters.
Starboard Tack
Jul 2012
#50
You keep attempting to insinuate that defense is equal to being an "executioner".
PavePusher
Jul 2012
#34
Feel free to post your own poll. I support neither, under any circumstances.
Starboard Tack
Jul 2012
#28
If you were sure all convictions were correct would you then support it?
Starboard Tack
Jul 2012
#53
Murder has a different definition, actually..but I understand your point.
Lizzie Poppet
Jul 2012
#56