Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spin

(17,493 posts)
47. Zimmerman may be standing behind "Stand Your Ground" ...
Thu Jun 14, 2012, 11:34 PM
Jun 2012

but he might well find that it doesn't apply in this case as it appears he started the confrontation.

The media is pushing the idea that "Stand Your Ground" laws give a person a license to kill. If you believe everything that you hear on TV or read in the newspapers, you are a fool. As you mentioned, there's one such fool in Texas who was just convicted of murder.

Texas man convicted in stand-your-ground case
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012-06-14/texas-stand-your-ground/55592380/1

You asked why a person needs a semi-auto weapon and I would suggest the decision on which to own is merely a personal preference. I own both revolvers and semi-auto pistols. I carry a revolver for self defense because I trust its reliability more than a semi-auto. I use my semi-auto handguns more for target shooting.

You feel that:


WHen people get pissed off now a days the guns come out. Nobody fights anymore. They go straight for their iron. Its pathetic.


I will point out that over 800,000 people in Florida have Concealed Weapons Permits and firearms are extremely common in this state. Admittedly we do have gun violence in the Sun Shine State but in reality many areas and cities in this nation with far stricter gun laws have as high or a higher rate of violent crimes caused by firearms.

If you visit the FDLE (Florida Department of Law Enforcement) homepage you will notice a graphic that says the level of crime in Florida is at a 41 year low. http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/Content/home.aspx

FBI Releases 2011 Preliminary Annual Uniform Crime Report
San Diego, Oceanside, and Escondido Experience Decreases in Violent Crime Rates


FBI San Diego June 13, 2012

According to the FBI’s Preliminary Annual Uniform Crime Report released Monday, June 11, 2012, the nation experienced a 4.0 percent decrease in the number of violent crimes and a 0.8 percent decline in the number of property crimes in 2011 when compared to data from 2010. The report is based on information the FBI gathered from 14,009 law enforcement agencies that submitted six to 12 comparable months of data for both 2010 and 2011.

Violent Crime

In 2011, all four of the violent crime offense categories—murder and non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault—declined nationwide when compared with data from 2010. Murder and non-negligent manslaughter declined 1.9 percent, while forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault each declined 4.0 percent.
Violent crime declined in all city groups. Cities with populations of 50,000 to 99,999 saw the largest decrease (5.2 percent) in violent crime. Violent crime decreased 6.6 percent in metropolitan counties and 4.7 percent in nonmetropolitan counties.
http://www.fbi.gov/sandiego/press-releases/2012/fbi-releases-2011-preliminary-annual-uniform-crime-report


Crime nationwide has been falling for years.

Crime in the United States

Crime statistics for the United States are published annually by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the Uniform Crime Reports which represents crimes reported to the police. The Bureau of Justice Statistics conducts the annual National Crime Victimization Survey which captures crimes not reported to the police.

In 2009 America's crime rate was roughly the same as in 1968, with the homicide rate being at its lowest level since 1964. Overall, the national crime rate was 3466 crimes per 100,000 residents, down from 3680 crimes per 100,000 residents forty years earlier in 1969 (-9.4%).


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States


I am not suggesting that civilian firearm ownership caused this drop in crime as there are far too many factors in the equation. But since 1968, the number of firearms in civilian hands has increased dramatically and during this same period of time, semi-auto firearms became popular.

More guns may not equal less crime, but more guns does not cause more crime.

B-b-b-b-b-butttttt...... PavePusher Jun 2012 #1
I am ready for some real answers. There has to be someone with a real plan! Logical Jun 2012 #3
I'm sure there is. discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2012 #73
The Plan? = "Trickle Down Gun Control" DonP Jun 2012 #79
The plan... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2012 #81
Well, to be fair, rrneck Jun 2012 #2
Once these fail....what is the next step. ileus Jun 2012 #4
Yep, the answer is more guns everywhere for everyone.... rfranklin Jun 2012 #5
And where exactly (links) rl6214 Jun 2012 #11
If you can't see the policies that the NRA is fighting for you need to go to summer school... rfranklin Jun 2012 #70
I asked for links you gave us nada rl6214 Jun 2012 #82
Here you go Mr. Nada... rfranklin Jun 2012 #84
Nice try but not even close to rl6214 Jun 2012 #86
Mr. Nada... rfranklin Jun 2012 #88
I asked for someone to post a link with the following words rl6214 Jun 2012 #89
The sum of their actions proves the statement... rfranklin Jun 2012 #90
So they didn't ever really say that - you just naturally extrapolated it on your own. DonP Jun 2012 #91
Hilarious!!!! bongbong Jun 2012 #92
That's two! discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2012 #93
Happy to give you some small amount of joy - you obviously need it. DonP Jun 2012 #94
Every post bongbong Jun 2012 #96
So you don't mind that gun control is off the political radar, that's great ... and very big of you. DonP Jun 2012 #97
WSOW bongbong Jun 2012 #98
Does that "we" include Wayne LaPierre as well? rfranklin Jun 2012 #99
No, but I used to spend a lot of time sitting at a desk in a Ward office in Chicago ... DonP Jun 2012 #100
This message was self-deleted by its author rfranklin Jun 2012 #101
You're dealing with a Colonist- evidence is optional with them: friendly_iconoclast Jun 2012 #105
The "sum" of what "actions"? PavePusher Jun 2012 #95
So your argument is "criminals ignore laws"? Scootaloo Jun 2012 #6
It's "argument" #554 bongbong Jun 2012 #10
Logical DOES NOT LIKE the NRA so rl6214 Jun 2012 #13
Well, that may be, but his argument IS that criminals break the law Scootaloo Jun 2012 #21
The point is that these stupid laws do NOTHING to make people safer! Nothing! Except make people.... Logical Jun 2012 #103
A guy named "Logical" shouldn't froth so much Scootaloo Jun 2012 #104
So having ineffective laws works for you? Not for me! N-t Logical Jun 2012 #107
In my experience... Scootaloo Jun 2012 #108
Ineffective is no gun zones! Read about them! You sound like the one.... Logical Jun 2012 #109
LOL bongbong Jun 2012 #32
Well, technically speaking, the fewer laws, the lower the crime rate, right? Scootaloo Jun 2012 #15
Yes bongbong Jun 2012 #33
I haven't met a religion that WASN'T strange, so I won't just single out the shamans of shootin' Scootaloo Jun 2012 #59
That's because it only exists in your mind rl6214 Jun 2012 #83
LOL bongbong Jun 2012 #85
And another foolish post from the bong section rl6214 Jun 2012 #87
Looks like bongbong's alert on you was not successful: petronius Jun 2012 #102
Dosen't suprise me one bit rl6214 Jun 2012 #106
Dont ask me ask the NRA, they are the ones who want to put a gun in hands,, benld74 Jun 2012 #7
"Your right to drink stops the second someone drives drunk!" TheWraith Jun 2012 #8
I have no moral panic and I was providing my opinion, benld74 Jun 2012 #14
"Your right to financial derivatives stops when you cause the economy to collapse!" DanTex Jun 2012 #18
Probably more than that if you count the SYG by common law states like gejohnston Jun 2012 #9
Fun fact... Scootaloo Jun 2012 #17
I understand that, but gejohnston Jun 2012 #20
yes, yes in fact it does Scootaloo Jun 2012 #28
No, You don't actually understand how the laws work. gejohnston Jun 2012 #34
So then the laws was unnecessary, since it's "just the same"? Scootaloo Jun 2012 #48
they are more just changes gejohnston Jun 2012 #55
Holy shit, you're presenting arguments! Scootaloo Jun 2012 #63
you don't bother to read provided links do you? gejohnston Jun 2012 #74
"BUT your right to own guns stops the second an innocent person gets shot, killed, or worse." Clames Jun 2012 #22
Zimmerman may be standing behind "Stand Your Ground" ... spin Jun 2012 #47
Can you tell me... Scootaloo Jun 2012 #50
You'll probably get an answer... Clames Jun 2012 #57
What do you think Logical means by this, then? Scootaloo Jun 2012 #58
He's advocating for... PavePusher Jun 2012 #61
Freedom of choice? Scootaloo Jun 2012 #64
No, I put it in the message body so I could use the html italics tags for emphasis. PavePusher Jun 2012 #65
I'm not the one pulling "freedom of choice" out of my ass here, chief Scootaloo Jun 2012 #67
How many criminals does one need to enounter before one should be armed? mvccd1000 Jun 2012 #69
One encounter with a violent street criminal is enough to die from. GreenStormCloud Jun 2012 #71
I'm not pulling anything out of my ass. PavePusher Jun 2012 #80
This. Clames Jun 2012 #76
The fact remains that there is still violence in our society ... spin Jun 2012 #75
Naw... If I had nothing to do with the injury/death of the innocent person... PavePusher Jun 2012 #60
Why does MY right to own a weapon for self defense end "the second an innocent person gets shot"? Common Sense Party Jun 2012 #68
You say "Background checks do not prevent criminals from getting guns!" safeinOhio Jun 2012 #12
how well does it work in Canada? gejohnston Jun 2012 #16
DOESN'T COUNT! DOESN'T COUNT! DOESN'T COUNT! Scootaloo Jun 2012 #19
why not? gejohnston Jun 2012 #23
Here, let me show you. Scootaloo Jun 2012 #30
the FBI was not talking about registration gejohnston Jun 2012 #38
I was talking about background checks in that post about safeinOhio Jun 2012 #43
I did? gejohnston Jun 2012 #46
Sorry, I was talking about the original poster. safeinOhio Jun 2012 #52
Fair enough, my mix-up on that Scootaloo Jun 2012 #44
Good idea, lets compare safeinOhio Jun 2012 #24
like I told DanTex gejohnston Jun 2012 #31
Your link is dated 3/5/2000. Bill Clinton was POTUS at that time. spin Jun 2012 #78
I'm sorry, I should have said, safeinOhio Jun 2012 #25
Actually, it works great in Canada. Just look at their homicide rate compared to ours. DanTex Jun 2012 #27
It actually has little to nothing to do with thier homicide rate gejohnston Jun 2012 #29
Of course it does. This is criminology 101. DanTex Jun 2012 #35
you proved my point gejohnston Jun 2012 #41
Could you better explain safeinOhio Jun 2012 #45
I was using these definitions gejohnston Jun 2012 #51
OK lets compare handgun crime safeinOhio Jun 2012 #36
OK compare Thunder Bay with gejohnston Jun 2012 #42
This has been discussed before. safeinOhio Jun 2012 #53
What evidence do you have El Paso has a lot of immigrants? gejohnston Jun 2012 #56
Did their homocide rate drop after they started registration? PavePusher Jun 2012 #62
Registration does absolutely nothing. Clames Jun 2012 #26
WOW bongbong Jun 2012 #37
Once again... Clames Jun 2012 #39
2% denial rate? Logical Jun 2012 #40
I would disagree with you. safeinOhio Jun 2012 #49
"To address issues of increasing VIOLENT CRIME in the country, the NRA called for more prisons, AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #54
Mostly the fact that violent crime is on a steady decrease Scootaloo Jun 2012 #66
It's all they've got. jeepnstein Jun 2012 #72
OK children, guns are bad mKay n/t Spoonman Jun 2012 #77
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Wow, Wow, Wow.....No Gun ...»Reply #47