Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ellisonz

(27,711 posts)
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 03:39 AM Apr 2012

Virginia Tech anniversary creates difficult moment on gun control for lawmakers [View all]

By Mike Lillis - 04/12/12 05:00 AM ET

A confluence of events related to gun violence — including the fifth anniversary of the Virginia Tech massacre — is creating an uncomfortable situation for congressional leaders when they return to Washington from their long spring vacation.

A large group of shooting victims has challenged a handful of leaders in both parties to meet on Capitol Hill next week to discuss ways to keep firearms out of dangerous hands — an uneasy topic for many members who will be forced to balance their sensitivity for the victims with their support for gun rights and the powerful gun lobby.

The victims are citing a long list of current events — the Virginia Tech anniversary, the February shooting death of Florida teenager Trayvon Martin and last week's fatal rampage at a religious college in Oakland, to name a few — to pressure lawmakers to confront a question that's been all but ignored by this Congress: Does current law do enough to keep firearms from those who might illegally use them against others?

--------

The offices of both Senate leaders — Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) — for instance, could not say if the two gun-rights supporters will meet with the shooting victims. Pressed on the issue, both offices clammed up.

More: http://thehill.com/homenews/house/221095-virginia-tech-anniversary-creates-uncomfortable-moment-on-gun-control-for-lawmakers


Gotta love that turn of phrase; no one is forced to do anything. Our elected officials sole goal should be to uphold the Constitution of the United States and not to balance politics. The reality here is clear: the Constitution states that public safety/general welfare are of public interest and that there is a right to keep and bear arms within the context of "a well-regulated Militia." That our public debate has been reduced to balancing "sensitivity for the victims" with a special interest group and their economic allies is shameful. Can anyone tell me why we haven't done better in this country? Can anyone tell me why we cannot do better in this country? Can anyone tell me why we shouldn't do better in this country? I'm all ears, but what I see here is nothing but a failure to uphold the Constitution and a betrayal of the American people. Maybe our elected officials should do more to force themselves to do their jobs...

49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Interesting, and I was with you until the first 'left turn' sarisataka Apr 2012 #1
... ellisonz Apr 2012 #7
That's all you've got? rl6214 Apr 2012 #19
It's a flawed article... ellisonz Apr 2012 #21
I don't see anything in thaty excerpt that he was incorrect about. PavePusher Apr 2012 #26
The entire premise that an external terror attack reflects on internal gun control laws! ellisonz Apr 2012 #29
How so? Why would a terrorist not focus on poorly defended targets? PavePusher Apr 2012 #34
So you're saying that if the hotel guests were better armed? ellisonz Apr 2012 #35
It wouldn't have hurt to have more guns... sarisataka Apr 2012 #41
Do you think the Mumbai attack would have had better, equal or worse results (from the perspective PavePusher Apr 2012 #49
A massive imbecile but... sarisataka Apr 2012 #42
Better? sarisataka Apr 2012 #27
Lawmakers are working - on guns rights. GreenStormCloud Apr 2012 #2
Interesting... mvccd1000 Apr 2012 #3
You're presuming all of those people agree with the "gun rights" agenda... ellisonz Apr 2012 #6
Such people may not agree on all the items in the "gun rights" agenda ... spin Apr 2012 #11
All the editing in the world... ellisonz Apr 2012 #18
Are members of a militia people? nt rrneck Apr 2012 #4
Yes. But you cannot deny that the construct is made... ellisonz Apr 2012 #5
The "construct" is the problem. rrneck Apr 2012 #8
You do realize that... ellisonz Apr 2012 #10
What do the terms rrneck Apr 2012 #14
Partially seperate Constitutional issues... ellisonz Apr 2012 #17
Oh now. rrneck Apr 2012 #20
Oy Vey. ellisonz Apr 2012 #30
My my rrneck Apr 2012 #32
It doesn't and you're changing the claim to fit your argument... ellisonz Apr 2012 #33
You never addressed any other rrneck Apr 2012 #36
One minor nit to pick. beevul Apr 2012 #43
True that. Important indeed. nt rrneck Apr 2012 #46
"All that matters is how we interpret the constitution in the context of today's reality." ellisonz Apr 2012 #44
You could at least draw your own cartoons. rrneck Apr 2012 #47
Why did the founders continue the decentralized militia system? Atypical Liberal Apr 2012 #15
They are doing what their constituents elected them to do - protect gun rights. GreenStormCloud Apr 2012 #9
And that is it in a nutshell. Being anti-gun is a death sentence in congress. Atypical Liberal Apr 2012 #13
Reasons why. Atypical Liberal Apr 2012 #12
"the preambulatory phrase of the second amendment does not exist." ellisonz Apr 2012 #16
Nope. Atypical Liberal Apr 2012 #22
You wrote that... ellisonz Apr 2012 #23
No, that is not what I wrote. You SELECTIVELY QUOTED what I wrote. Atypical Liberal Apr 2012 #24
Kids. Waddyagonnado? nt rrneck Apr 2012 #25
Didn't change the meaning one bit. ellisonz Apr 2012 #31
If it didn't change the meaning why did you omit it? Atypical Liberal Apr 2012 #37
I appreciate your lengthy attempt at an argument... ellisonz Apr 2012 #38
No matter how many times you try and put words in my mouth, it won't work. Atypical Liberal Apr 2012 #39
Why do you hate freedom? ellisonz Apr 2012 #40
I never said he did. Atypical Liberal Apr 2012 #48
We haven't done better because people keep trying to limit the 2A... ileus Apr 2012 #28
It might be because most further restrictions are either expensive, intrusive, or unworkable. krispos42 Apr 2012 #45
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Virginia Tech anniversary...»Reply #0