Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Gun control advocates have a victory to look forward to -- UPDATED [View all]appal_jack
(3,813 posts)60. Riiight, just like state-issue driver's licenses.
Riiight, just like state-issue driver's licenses. Just like me having an NC driver's license in-state is fine, but if I want to drive an hour to TN or VA, I have to take a whole other set of tests for licenses in those states...
Oh, wait, it's actually not like that at all... Could it be that the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense is being treated as a second-class revocable privilege by the state of NJ?
They are authoritarian bastards, from the NJ DA refusing to sensibly use discretion to those here at DU here in this thread contorting theories to justify this oppression.
-app
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gun control advocates have a victory to look forward to -- UPDATED [View all]
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
OP
3 years is the mandatory minimum sentence unless the DA opts for "1st time offender" program.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#7
"Yes, people do have a right to earn their living without breaking laws."
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#14
wow. Pro-RKBA'ers continually claim anti-2A'ers have no respect for other civil rights as well.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#17
Following the law merely because it is "the law" is ALWAYS the basis for tyranny.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#79
Sorry, just reread your post, and I misinterpreted it the first time.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Jul 2014
#29
Whether or not the criminals were armed and if so, with what, is immaterial.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#13
There are laws against robbing people. Why would those criminals suddenly obey gun laws?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#21
So, in other words you are celebrating the victory of destroying the mother in the OP.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#40
The gun is powerless, inert and inanimate when it is independent of its possessor.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#86
Self-defense is a fundamental right. States do not get to choose how to regulate and enforce
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#41
Simple way to resolve this problem, machine guns and bazookas are legal in all states for all ages
randys1
Jul 2014
#51
You guys are predictable, as soon as the correct penis observation comes in, you react
randys1
Jul 2014
#55
If you are so opposed to guns, how can you possibly wish this woman to NOT face any consequences?
Jenoch
Jul 2014
#89
For being honest with authorities? while others point guns at federal agents and with
randys1
Jul 2014
#92
"My being against guns in general has nothing to do with the injustice this Woman is facing..."
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#91
Be sure to forward all you penis references to the following organization --
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#77
Stupid laws should be repealeded. And if they aren't repealed they should be ignored.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#78
What about the nature of her offense merits destroying her life and her family?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#101
"As a gun owner, it is her responsibility to be familiar with the gun laws of her state..."
beevul
Jul 2014
#105
She is not the person with the criminal history being referred to in those statements
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2014
#107
So a woman can be assaulted with impunity but a woman who wants to protect herself from an assault
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2014
#114