Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: What is Gun Violence Liability Insurance? [View all]madville
(7,413 posts)3. So only rich people get to own those weapons?
That won't fly in the courts, it's an unreasonable amount and discriminates against then poor an middle class.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Another idea bouncing around and gaining traction is requiring all gun owners to be bonded,
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#2
It'll "fly" in the courts alrighty, and some version of it is coming to the USA. Bank it.
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#4
Dishonest frames and brazen Straw Men always make me smile. Please try again. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#14
"To the extent that they are arms that are in common use" - LOL. Funny stuff. n/t.
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#33
The government isn't charging you. Every dime of your premium goes to a private insurer.
lastlib
Feb 2013
#10
"Plain and simple" - LOL. So put your money where your mouthy keyboard is, and sue to have all
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#29
Except, I'm not the one claiming such taxes are "unconstitutional" infringements on a "right":
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#38
You don't follow along so well: I didn't bring up the "Poll tax," your pal upthread did.
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#42
"Who was talking about taxes?" -->"Tax or premium. It amounts to the same result"
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#39
You go right on believing that nonsense. Next time you purchase your next PRD at Gump's
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#13
Except, the "fee" proposed - actually a bond deposit - applies only to SA handguns and
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#46
Absurd. I don't interact with repliers who compare sensible gun regulation measures
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#49
No, it's not: no one is forcing you to purchase/own an assault weapon or SA handgun.
apocalypsehow
Feb 2013
#31