Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
45. Your not making sense.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 05:09 PM
Jan 2012

Where is the "tax" that pays for the existing prosecution of criminals?

The US has declared a war on drugs that costs about $40 billion a year. What exactly are we taxing to pay for that? So far we are only 23 days into the year. We have spent over $2 billion dollars and have arrested over 100,000 people for drug violations. We have incarcerated over 700 people on drug violations as well. Who is paying for the prosecutors and judges to investigate, prosecute and hear those cases?

Should we tax prescription medication to pay for those who abuse it? Why should the general public pay for the outlandish policies endorsed by the pharmaceutical lobby? Those on medications know that they are buying a controlled substance, and should bare the financial burden for prosecuting and imprisoning those who steal and distribute these controlled substances.

Where is the "tax" for prosecuting and incarcerating murder, rape, assault, arson, robbery, burglary, illegal drug distribution/possession, grand larceny, etc...




"Criminal Engages in Criminal Behavior" -- stop the presses! Straw Man Jan 2012 #1
With his trusty semi-automatic rifle... ellisonz Jan 2012 #3
He got six shots off. Straw Man Jan 2012 #5
He didn't though... ellisonz Jan 2012 #7
Semi-auto's ARE hunting and competition rifles. PavePusher Jan 2012 #15
My eyes are wide open, thank you very much. n/t ellisonz Jan 2012 #22
Post removed Post removed Jan 2012 #23
Well peel them back a little longer.. X_Digger Jan 2012 #33
His ignorance is willfull and can only be cured by some intellectual integrity ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #35
Ahh...where would be we be without the emotion-less. ellisonz Jan 2012 #42
Emotions like racism and hatred do not lead to good government ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #43
All the guns we can make and hand out because the free market commands... ellisonz Jan 2012 #44
Hand out? liberal_biker Jan 2012 #47
Would you care to elaborate... ellisonz Jan 2012 #49
Sure... liberal_biker Jan 2012 #50
The amusing thing about this "debate" is that Simo 1939_1940 Jan 2012 #52
You totally missed the point. Straw Man Jan 2012 #16
Yet for some reason the thug still chooses handguns most often... SteveW Jan 2012 #17
Please explain how California "loosely" regulates firearms. Glassunion Jan 2012 #2
I don't think individual state laws... ellisonz Jan 2012 #4
You do realize that the majority of crime guns Glassunion Jan 2012 #6
That's a real comfort. n/t ellisonz Jan 2012 #8
Which brings us back to my question. Glassunion Jan 2012 #10
You ask the impossible from someone who posts on emotion not reason ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #11
An argument used often... ellisonz Jan 2012 #20
How you 'feel' about something means nothing when it goes against empirical evidence. PavePusher Jan 2012 #24
I suggest you explore your humanity... ellisonz Jan 2012 #25
I suspect we will happily remain a band of unevolved brutes... friendly_iconoclast Jan 2012 #36
Say what? Straw Man Jan 2012 #37
loose = citizens are allowed to own/buy actual death spewers. ileus Jan 2012 #13
Your question is based on a false premise. n/t ellisonz Jan 2012 #19
Then so are your statements in the OP. Glassunion Jan 2012 #26
As a national policy... ellisonz Jan 2012 #27
So you know where this gun originated from Glassunion Jan 2012 #28
I know the possibilities... ellisonz Jan 2012 #29
I believe we have more than effective gun control. Glassunion Jan 2012 #34
Sounds like you think we need to raise more revenue... ellisonz Jan 2012 #38
We need to raise revenue to not drop charges? Glassunion Jan 2012 #39
Takes prosecutors and judges to move those cases through... ellisonz Jan 2012 #40
Your not making sense. Glassunion Jan 2012 #45
Funny... ellisonz Jan 2012 #46
Why should I take responsibility for a crime I didn't commit? liberal_biker Jan 2012 #48
Funny... Glassunion Jan 2012 #51
Except... ellisonz Jan 2012 #53
but how about crime in general gejohnston Jan 2012 #54
You missed the point completely. Glassunion Jan 2012 #55
"The one and only common denominator in all of these scenarios is the human." ellisonz Jan 2012 #56
So? Glassunion Jan 2012 #57
Aren't we constantly told the gun is a tool? ellisonz Jan 2012 #59
Ahh, waxing philosophical, the new wharrgarble.. X_Digger Jan 2012 #61
"Stupidity doesn't appreciate in value with age." ellisonz Jan 2012 #62
Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est. Glassunion Jan 2012 #63
Spontaneous free association video clip. rrneck Jan 2012 #64
although at close quarters gejohnston Jan 2012 #58
You spend too much time... ellisonz Jan 2012 #60
Actually I don't gejohnston Jan 2012 #65
re: "I don't think individual state laws have much to do with the spread of arms to criminals..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #12
Federal law is much more important... ellisonz Jan 2012 #21
re: "Federal law is much more important..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #30
heh... ellisonz Jan 2012 #31
Oh my! discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #32
Drugs the #1threat to freedom...another gun victimized ileus Jan 2012 #9
Respectfully, it is the War On Drugs which is #1 threat to freedom. nt SteveW Jan 2012 #18
Clearly this shows that police don't need to be armed since the undercover detective... aikoaiko Jan 2012 #14
Innocent until proven guilty. We still do that, right? montanto Jan 2012 #41
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Man held for allegedly sh...»Reply #45