Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Man held for allegedly shooting at undercover cop [View all]Glassunion
(10,201 posts)10. Which brings us back to my question.
Please explain how California "loosely" regulates firearms and how those "loose" regulations contributed to this crime.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
His ignorance is willfull and can only be cured by some intellectual integrity
ProgressiveProfessor
Jan 2012
#35
You ask the impossible from someone who posts on emotion not reason
ProgressiveProfessor
Jan 2012
#11
How you 'feel' about something means nothing when it goes against empirical evidence.
PavePusher
Jan 2012
#24
re: "I don't think individual state laws have much to do with the spread of arms to criminals..."
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Jan 2012
#12
Clearly this shows that police don't need to be armed since the undercover detective...
aikoaiko
Jan 2012
#14