Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

johndoeX

(268 posts)

9. It may say IAS -

Reply to William Seger (Reply #8)

Fri Jun 27, 2014, 07:11 PM

Jun 2014

But it is the Vd line.

From the Illustrated Guide To Aerodynamics.

From the FAR's

Seger, have you yet figured out why it doesn't say "Factor of 1.5" between the arrows designating "Overspeed Margin", yet says, "Factor of 1.5" between the upper and lower arrows designating positive and negative G loads?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Balsamo Busted, again [View all] William Seger Jun 2014 OP

Dang Seger.... wildbilln864 Jun 2014 #1

Oh yeah, I'm ready William Seger Jun 2014 #2

Seger fails comprehension again. johndoeX Jun 2014 #3

ouch! wildbilln864 Jun 2014 #4

Yeah... Seger is pretty much done at this point... johndoeX Jun 2014 #5

"Do you think Seger will admit he is wrong? " wildbilln864 Jun 2014 #6

I agree... johndoeX Jun 2014 #7

You're still using the fudged diagram in your new video? William Seger Jul 2014 #16

LOL, bad guess William Seger Jun 2014 #8

It may say IAS - johndoeX Jun 2014 #9

LOL. Yeah, why admit you were wrong William Seger Jun 2014 #12

Wrong again Seger. johndoeX Jun 2014 #13

I already asked the FAA and two engineering forums William Seger Jun 2014 #15

..., someone made up some stuff, or found another internet journalist to quote mine superbeachnut Jun 2014 #10

Beachy, do you agree with Seger? johndoeX Jun 2014 #11

Yes, I agree, you have no idea what the point is superbeachnut Jun 2014 #14

the ultimate load envelope inam56 Aug 2014 #17

pilots for truth have no aero experts superbeachnut Aug 2014 #18

and 1.15Vd (or better 1.2Vd standards!) need to prove that damping ratio are stable inam56 Aug 2014 #19

767-200 FAA certificat inam56 Aug 2014 #20

1.2 was the old 25.629 superbeachnut Aug 2014 #21

use of FSX by balsamo inam56 Aug 2014 #22

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Balsamo Busted, again»Reply #9