Creative Speculation

ocpagu

(1,954 posts)

30. Several of Bazant's explanations...

Reply to tomk52 (Reply #24)

Mon Mar 11, 2013, 02:12 PM

Mar 2013

...i.e, "pancake theory", were "debunked" by NIST itself...

So much for your "engineering God".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

82 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Conspiracy v. fact 9/11 [View all] Prog_gun_owner Feb 2013 OP

My favorite.... Frank_Norris_Lives Feb 2013 #1

Yup, ludicrous. But... tomk52 Mar 2013 #13

My apologies..... Frank_Norris_Lives Mar 2013 #46

thanks for reply. tomk52 Mar 2013 #51

The engines of the plane that hit the Pentagon energetically dissasembled themselves when they diges AtheistCrusader Feb 2013 #2

Ok Prog_gun_owner Feb 2013 #3

I don't know what the fuck "Thur-mate" is. AtheistCrusader Feb 2013 #4

The whole "official" 9/11 story is riddled with stinking-lying Republican holes Berlum Feb 2013 #5

You do realize, don't you ... tomk52 Mar 2013 #57

Could thermite cutters even survive a plane impact? Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2013 #62

Depends on what the word "survive" means... tomk52 Mar 2013 #63

Thank-you Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #70

An aside... tomk52 Mar 2013 #64

Here's a picture of what tomk52 is talking about. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #65

Thank-you -- I was about to "Press 1 for English" Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #69

You do realize that the NIST animation Politicalboi May 2013 #73

Um, the south tower core columns up to floor 50 or so are visible standing in the dust AtheistCrusader May 2013 #78

LOL ocpagu May 2013 #79

I thought you truthers gave up... tomk52 May 2013 #81

The right way to ask questions... tomk52 Mar 2013 #6

In that case, I have a first question..... Frank_Norris_Lives Mar 2013 #8

Jet engines don't leave thick, white exhaust trails until ... tomk52 Mar 2013 #9

Are you saying.... Frank_Norris_Lives Mar 2013 #14

I am saying that ... tomk52 Mar 2013 #16

A well-reasoned explanation for the smoke trail: greyl Mar 2013 #19

Nice animation but.... Frank_Norris_Lives Mar 2013 #20

Luckily, there's VIDEO of that exceedingly short period of time. Remember that? nt greyl Mar 2013 #22

Perhaps in the grand scheme of things, ... tomk52 Mar 2013 #23

Well, that's strange because..... Frank_Norris_Lives Mar 2013 #26

Well, I have to agree that this is strange... tomk52 Mar 2013 #32

One certainly can't help but admire... Frank_Norris_Lives Mar 2013 #39

OF COURSE you get to ignore all those witnesses. tomk52 Mar 2013 #40

Well said! zappaman Mar 2013 #41

Wow...... Frank_Norris_Lives Mar 2013 #42

... said Frank, rubbing his sore ass. William Seger Mar 2013 #43

And here is your last bastion ... tomk52 Mar 2013 #44

You and.... Frank_Norris_Lives Mar 2013 #47

LOL, I had forgotten that... William Seger Mar 2013 #48

What you scoffin' at, Willis?? tomk52 Mar 2013 #53

Well, there has to be SOME explanation William Seger Mar 2013 #55

Yup. tomk52 Mar 2013 #56

2nd last bastion... tomk52 Mar 2013 #52

They'll say anything Politicalboi May 2013 #74

Saying nonsense doesn't make it true. tomk52 May 2013 #82

How did the engines penetrate through a 10' hole? BobbyBoring Mar 2013 #10

5 sentences. So much misinformation... tomk52 Mar 2013 #12

Aren't we here.... Frank_Norris_Lives Mar 2013 #15

You went thru a lot of effort to be this lazy ... tomk52 Mar 2013 #17

Good Grief! Frank_Norris_Lives Mar 2013 #21

You got a bus to catch...?? tomk52 Mar 2013 #25

We have for years Politicalboi May 2013 #75

It wasn't a 10 foot hole hack89 Mar 2013 #27

This is a 90' hole? BobbyBoring Mar 2013 #49

That is the 10' EXIT hole in the Pentagon E ring - not the entrance hole in the facade. hack89 Mar 2013 #50

Bobby, anything more to say...? tomk52 Mar 2013 #45

You say you read the FEMA/ASCE Pentagon BPAT report? tomk52 Mar 2013 #54

I have questions that don't involve the collapses Politicalboi Mar 2013 #7

Here's an answer that doesn't involve collapses... tomk52 Mar 2013 #11

Wow... what a waste of time reading this. ocpagu Mar 2013 #18

Are you kidding? tomk52 Mar 2013 #24

Several of Bazant's explanations... ocpagu Mar 2013 #30

Again, tomk52 Mar 2013 #31

On NIST site ocpagu Mar 2013 #35

Yup, I didn't think you understood either one. tomk52 Mar 2013 #37

There are pictures of seats (with bodies attached) hack89 Mar 2013 #28

Because... ocpagu Mar 2013 #29

How do you pack so much "wrong"... tomk52 Mar 2013 #58

LOL. ocpagu Mar 2013 #60

This has become a pattern. tomk52 Mar 2013 #61

Ya can't have it both ways, government apologists AlwaysQuestion Mar 2013 #33

Yeah right zappaman Mar 2013 #34

Who in this planet has ever used the expression ocpagu Mar 2013 #36

it's 2005 all over again? tomk52 Mar 2013 #38

You cannot reason a person out of a position he did not reason himself into in the first place stevebreeze May 2013 #76

Because.... Frank_Norris_Lives May 2013 #77

He knows that... ocpagu May 2013 #80

There's nothing resembling sound premises or valid logical inferences in your argument William Seger Mar 2013 #59

Pro_gun_owner...Here's a link to a video that I encourage you to watch... truth2power Mar 2013 #66

"... not honestly searching for a resolution ..." tomk52 Apr 2013 #67

No thanks.... truth2power Apr 2013 #68

you seem to have a "legal" slant on things... tomk52 Apr 2013 #71

Welcome to the club Politicalboi May 2013 #72