Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
20. I read the second
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 10:12 PM
Jul 2012

Like I said, ngo-watch made things go wacky.

Do you know WHY the Goldstone report relied heavily on NGO reports? Because Israel flat refused to provide any information for it. Their position was that they would provide an "internal investigation" and release their own findings. I'll admit my own doubts here; I don't trust the local police department to investigate themselves, why would I trust a damned military to do so? Regardless, he had been commissioned to create this report, and so he did, with the information he could gather. Israel, choosing to not divulge a scrap of its own information, really, truly, honestly has no place to whine about the results.

But goodness gracious did they whine. Even before any findings were reported, Goldstone was suddenly a raving Israel-hating antisemite lying motherfucker and the absolute worst human being on the entire planet. He was accused of "collaborating with terrorists." There were death threats against Goldstone, for the first time since 1990, when his investigation into apartheid won him death threats from White Afrikaaner separatists (kind of ironic, that)

In fact for daring to accept the UN's assignment for him, he was nearly barred from attending his grandson's Bar Mitzvah by the South African Zionist Federation. Such class, those Team Israel folks.

Even with that pressure on him, he did not retract his report. He said that if he had had the information which Israel later released, the report would have been different. Well... Duh? He also commended Israel for at least investigating, unlike Hamas, which did jack squat. It's not exactly the massive capitulation you're presenting it as.

Which is why your source links to one of its own articles that keeps right up with the attacks even after supposedly getting what it wanted.

Now, the funny thing is... Israel's own report confirms many of the situations reported by Goldstone;
http://www.hybridstates.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/GazaUpdateJuly2010.pdf

http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Terrorism-+Obstacle+to+Peace/Hamas+war+against+Israel/Gaza_Operation_Investigations_Second_Update_July_2010.htm (Second source, since I'm sure you probably won't take hybridstates as "credible.&quot

Whether or not these are war crimes would be up to an impartial jury, I would think. But you and I know that's just not going to fucking happen, unless I guess we get some random villagers from the hills of Laos to review evidence and reach a conclusion (which... honestly sounds like it might work ) Goldstone's initial position that they did qualify as war crimes is perhaps due to, you know, Israel flat out refusing to participate in the investigation and thus denying Goldstone some necessary information and perhaps convincing arguments. It's clear that choosing to do so would have saved everyone a lot of trouble.

So to recap.

Team Israel - and you are very much included in this group, Shira - responded to the idea of investigating human rights violations on OCL with threats to murder a man, antisemitic attacks, harassment of this man's family, dehumanization of him and his colleagues and sources, a campaign of lies and mis-characterization designed to try to wreck his illustrious and admired career and achievements, a political campaign to bar him from his religious observances, all while Israel was refusing to provide a scrap of information to him that would have, evidently, resulted in a somewhat different report that cast Israel in a better light.

All to the end effect of basically being able to say "Look! Israel is better than Hamas!" which is a really low bar to set for yourself, if you ask me.

The name of the accusers changes, but Israel continues to break international law. PDJane Jun 2012 #1
Maybe it has something to do with the lack of prospects for those children to get on in tbe world. bemildred Jun 2012 #2
Not a surprise at all azurnoir Jun 2012 #3
I wonder how juvenile offenders are treated in GB Mosby Jun 2012 #4
That is surprising... shaayecanaan Jun 2012 #5
I can tell you that in the USA juveniles are treated like fresh meat. bemildred Jun 2012 #6
especially since the privatization of dentention facilities n/t azurnoir Jun 2012 #8
There was an interesting tidbit on QI last night... shaayecanaan Jun 2012 #10
Thanks I did not know about how far the prison labor had went azurnoir Jun 2012 #11
Richard Millett: Save the children…except when they’re Israeli. shira Jun 2012 #7
I'm sorry, I stop reading articles when they do shit like this; Scootaloo Jun 2012 #12
The whole report is diversionary and politically loaded. That's the point of bringing up ... shira Jun 2012 #13
yep sort of like CNN and Fox News not thinking they had to read azurnoir Jun 2012 #14
Oh, okay. Why bother with information, when you can "just know" Scootaloo Jun 2012 #16
Yes, I do know that w/o question, and only the deliberately blind would deny it, there's an obvious shira Jul 2012 #17
So given the obvious agenda of you and your sources, what makes you the least bit trustworthy? Scootaloo Jul 2012 #18
My credibility isn't the issue. Did you read both links? Especially the 2nd one (not NGO-M)? shira Jul 2012 #19
I read the second Scootaloo Jul 2012 #20
The NGO's that fed Goldstone the central argument & conclusion of his report.... shira Jul 2012 #21
I know what your argument is, Shira Scootaloo Jul 2012 #22
No you don't. shira Jul 2012 #23
Yeah, I do; you're not very subtle Scootaloo Jul 2012 #24
An excellent post shaayecanaan Jul 2012 #25
Why does the sourcing of right-wing garbage "stick" here, anyway? Scootaloo Jul 2012 #30
I ask myself that all the time. Why do people constantly quote from Hamas approved media here? shira Jul 2012 #40
Shira, as I cover below... Scootaloo Jul 2012 #43
You didn't cover anything below. shira Jul 2012 #44
I think you're the one not understanding Scootaloo Jul 2012 #45
There's a difference b/w rightwing sources, liberal ones, and hard left ones.... shira Jul 2012 #48
Sigh. Here are some true/false questions you can either choose to answer or choose to evade.... shira Jul 2012 #26
You don't have to be so hostile; just give me a sly come-hither look! Scootaloo Jul 2012 #29
Why the thin skin when your posts to me are even more hostile? Anyway, I'm stunned w/ yr response... shira Jul 2012 #31
Thin skin? I was just saying you're quite the charmer! Scootaloo Jul 2012 #33
Uhh right, the antisemitic "Lobby" got to Goldstone (the poor victim). And after several posts.... shira Jul 2012 #34
I'm glad we agree on something, finally Scootaloo Jul 2012 #35
No, we don't agree. I think it's ridiculous to claim the "Lobby" got a "poor victim" like Goldstone shira Jul 2012 #36
"The entire report was invalidated" you say? Scootaloo Jul 2012 #37
It's dead and buried, in the dustbin of history. No one brings it up anymore... shira Jul 2012 #38
Nor have you responded to my question about HRW and their report on Syria, Shira Scootaloo Jul 2012 #41
What's there to really respond to? Let's say their report on Syria is perfect.... shira Jul 2012 #42
It's simple, really. Scootaloo Jul 2012 #46
When the original founder of HRW has a problem with them, something's up... shira Jul 2012 #47
Or perhaps Bernstein changed his mind. Scootaloo Jul 2012 #50
This is great oberliner Jul 2012 #51
Not a huge fan of the Henry Rollins Band Scootaloo Jul 2012 #53
Maybe you should ask yourself why Goldstone and Robert Bernstein turned on Roth and HRW.... shira Jul 2012 #52
I thought you were done, Shira? Scootaloo Jul 2012 #54
Just saying Goldstone, Bernstein, and B'tselem call BS on HRW claims. Deal with it as you wish. shira Jul 2012 #55
I had thought you were calling it quits, is all Scootaloo Jul 2012 #56
Can't defend HRW now, can you? Go back to where this all started in post #12... shira Jul 2012 #58
What's there to "defend" them against? Scootaloo Jul 2012 #62
LOL. Even B'tselem directors have a problem with HRW's main allegations vs. Israel... shira Jul 2012 #63
LOL. bemildred Jul 2012 #32
you may be shocked at this but links to sites such as the Volokh Conspiracy to prove your opinion azurnoir Jul 2012 #27
Don't really know what you're on about... shira Jul 2012 #39
well 'Alice' I guess the rabbit was talking to you or was it the queen? sounds more like the queen azurnoir Jul 2012 #49
By unique... Scootaloo Jul 2012 #57
could be n/t azurnoir Jul 2012 #61
When you adopt the rhetoric of regressive rightwing anti-Israel regimes and advocate.... shira Jul 2012 #59
so do Israels 'liberal' civil rights laws apply to the non citizen Palestinians living in the azurnoir Jul 2012 #60
No, of course not. But you're not merely for Palestinians having their own state... shira Jul 2012 #64
Palestinians civil rights are on hold spin that anyway you'd like it is the truth azurnoir Jul 2012 #65
a report on this from B'tselem who interviewed 50 Palestinian kids who had been detained by Israel azurnoir Jun 2012 #9
Arrests of Palestinian children– ‘a boy in leg irons’ — is becoming a big story in UK JohnyCanuck Jun 2012 #15
WATCH: Palestinian child kicked by Border Police in Hebron azurnoir Jul 2012 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Israel sees Palestinian c...»Reply #20