Israel/Palestine

shira

(30,109 posts)

63. More in #57 and #62 below. n/t

Reply to Scuba (Reply #25)

Sat Apr 25, 2015, 05:44 AM

Apr 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

121 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lancet medical journal under attack for 'extremist hate propaganda' over its coverage of the Israeli [View all] shira Apr 2015 OP

If you call out the Israeli's for their treatment of Palistinians it's "extremist hate propaganda"? Scuba Apr 2015 #1

No. The Lancet lied in order to slander Israel. That's hate incitement. n/t shira Apr 2015 #2

What did they publish that was a lie? Scuba Apr 2015 #3

The final straw was an open letter last September... shira Apr 2015 #7

Your link goes to another of your own posts. I chased a couple links but none led to ... Scuba Apr 2015 #12

See posts #6 and #9. n/t shira Apr 2015 #14

So again, no links to anything Lancet published that was a lie, just a lot of complaints. Scuba Apr 2015 #19

There are several links pointing to lies published.... shira Apr 2015 #22

Why don't you post a link to the Lancet's lies? Scuba Apr 2015 #25

Because she can't Scootaloo Apr 2015 #27

She can't. If they existed she would have done it already. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #43

More in #57 and #62 below. n/t shira Apr 2015 #63

So you still haven't linked to any lies but instead posted "justifications" for war crimes. Scuba Apr 2015 #68

The hell I didn't. How many lies do u need to see? n/t shira Apr 2015 #74

What lie? All you've linked to is whining about being exposed. Scuba Apr 2015 #76

Here's a super big, BLATANT lie for starters that's undeniable. shira Apr 2015 #79

You've still shown no lie about what Israel is doing/has done to the Palistinians. Your "big lie" Scuba Apr 2015 #80

Hmm. Couldn't even acknowledge a blatant lie about their conflict of interest... shira Apr 2015 #81

The purpose of The Lancet, New England Journal etc, is to discuss still_one Apr 2015 #28

Oh the horrors... R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #42

There is a reason for that. The same reason that at Cern scientists from all over the world meet still_one Apr 2015 #48

When global politics are causing a health disaster, I expect a medical journal to say something, yes Scootaloo Apr 2015 #49

No kidding. It's like talking to children that R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #51

I think you're onto something, there Scootaloo Apr 2015 #52

The Lancet had so many subscribers canceling King_David Apr 2015 #4

Good leftynyc Apr 2015 #5

I just found the letter the leftynyc Apr 2015 #6

An annual Lancet subscription is $169 Scootaloo Apr 2015 #30

It used to be a quality Medical Journal King_David Apr 2015 #31

That it still is isn't in debate Scootaloo Apr 2015 #32

Gynecology not my thing. King_David Apr 2015 #33

Thank goodness, you didn't google it. Scootaloo Apr 2015 #34

You available? King_David Apr 2015 #35

Afraid not, Dave Scootaloo Apr 2015 #37

Never a dull moment. nt King_David Apr 2015 #39

... R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #44

Could you point out the lies that The Lancett allegedly wrote WRT R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #8

See #6 above. It's all there... shira Apr 2015 #9

Try again. #6 has a link to a rebuttal letter. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #10

It's in the rebuttal letter. I suggest you read it. n/t shira Apr 2015 #11

The rebuttal letter us vague. So once again... R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #20

No it's not. I doubt you read it. Here's the link to it again... shira Apr 2015 #23

Well then shira, post these alleged lies. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #26

I believe this is called a disinformation campaign. guillaumeb Apr 2015 #13

See the link in post #9 from reality based community. n/t shira Apr 2015 #15

I read the post guillaumeb Apr 2015 #16

It's reality based. Your side still believes in fantasy like a legal RoR for millions... shira Apr 2015 #17

So again, there is no specific argument about the Lancet article. guillaumeb Apr 2015 #18

It's in the rebuttal letter. Facts are there. n/t shira Apr 2015 #21

You're losing the argument once again shira. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #38

I do believe that you are on to something. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #45

14 more responses to Lancet letter shira Apr 2015 #24

Oh, NGO-Monitor. Now we're talking about quality! Scootaloo Apr 2015 #29

It's like watching a car wreck before it happens... R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #40

if the car is trapped in an eternal Zeno's Dichotomy Paradox Scootaloo Apr 2015 #41

Kind of like nunchuck guy over and over forever? R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #46

For the passing DU'er... Scootaloo Apr 2015 #47

... R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #50

Comedy isn't your thing in afraid King_David Apr 2015 #53

re-watch the video, Dave. achieve enlightenment Scootaloo Apr 2015 #54

"One of the smoothest left-bashing operations is NGO Monitor" muriel_volestrangler Apr 2015 #70

For the passing DUer... R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #36

LoL. They lied at the end when declaring they had no competing interests shira Apr 2015 #56

This message was self-deleted by its author shira Apr 2015 #64

My-oh-my, shira. What a ham-handed reply. LOL. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #69

You asked to see a lie & you got it. Conflict of interest is a biggie. shira Apr 2015 #75

You're comedey gold, shira, comedey gold. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #83

Keep digging. What do you think about the poison gas lie? shira Apr 2015 #84

You mean this? R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #86

Unconfirmed means no evidence of poison gas shira Apr 2015 #87

I guess it's dictionary time and unconfirmed does not mean a lie azurnoir Apr 2015 #107

Another one of shira's conspiracies shut down...Poor dear. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #119

Yeah, it means unconfirmed. No evidence, no proof. It could be reported.... shira Apr 2015 #120

except no body was going to prison here were they unconfirmed means just that azurnoir Apr 2015 #121

Tripe. Little Tich Apr 2015 #55

here's a working link azurnoir Apr 2015 #58

Thanks, I have no idea how I managed to paste a dud link. n/t Little Tich Apr 2015 #59

it's one of net mystery's azurnoir Apr 2015 #61

The open letter to Gaza (being defended here) was written by outright racists shira Apr 2015 #60

you seem to think David Duke is a household name world round azurnoir Apr 2015 #65

Nice try but it goes well beyond David Duke. Like “Israel and parasites” shira Apr 2015 #77

Do I need them? what does NGO Monitor have to say :) azurnoir Apr 2015 #85

Their hate is on record. Why pretend otherwise? n/t shira Apr 2015 #91

would you be speaking of the reality based community - again? azurnoir Apr 2015 #92

Reality-based people wouldn't blame Jews for the Boston Marathon bombing... shira Apr 2015 #93

what you call lies have been debunked the rest is for the most part unsourced claims from ToI's blog azurnoir Apr 2015 #100

Sorry, I have made up my mind. The Lancet trumps NGO-Monitor. n/t Little Tich Apr 2015 #66

Yes, the Lancet posting a letter from David Duke fans & Hamas supporters... shira Apr 2015 #78

You seem to think the phrase "reality-based" is a trump card for your fantastical nonsense Scootaloo Apr 2015 #88

actually "reality based community" is likely a Rove-ism azurnoir Apr 2015 #89

Are you capable of acknowledging reality? Let's see... shira Apr 2015 #90

Asks someone who thinks Mohammed al-Dura is alive after being killed by his father Scootaloo Apr 2015 #94

Pathetic that you couldn't acknowledge the very blatant conflict-of-interest lie. shira Apr 2015 #98

I acknowledge that you're lying about it, if that helps. Scootaloo Apr 2015 #99

It is the rebuttal letter you posted that says "We declare no competing interests." azurnoir Apr 2015 #101

You just lied in #94. Let's see if you can acknowledge & then apologize for it shira Apr 2015 #102

Well, if you insist... Scootaloo Apr 2015 #103

You should be the forum archivist oberliner Apr 2015 #104

Well, I keep arguing with the most forgetful and repetitive people Scootaloo Apr 2015 #105

I know what you mean oberliner Apr 2015 #106

You're still doing it. You refer to a very long thread rather than admit you're wrong... shira Apr 2015 #108

You're adorable Scootaloo Apr 2015 #109

Again, show me exactly where I wrote that al-Dura is alive, & yet his father killed him. shira Apr 2015 #110

Here's the title of the article you post: Scootaloo Apr 2015 #111

The title? Since when is posting an article proof that a person believes... shira Apr 2015 #112

The fact that you defend the article all through the thread, for one. Scootaloo Apr 2015 #113

Oh, great proof there. Seriously, you fail logic 101. shira Apr 2015 #114

Your hobbies aside, shira, the fact is scoot just R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2015 #115

LoL. Shira? My backside was just handed to me, so you'll have to address me.... shira Apr 2015 #116

4 falsehoods in the letter shira Apr 2015 #57

A Serious Medical Journal Just Went Totally Clinical shira Apr 2015 #62

Mads Gilbert - 911 defender, lied about Israel using DIME in 2009 shira Apr 2015 #71

Dr Mads Gilbert - Hamas supporter shira Apr 2015 #72

Dr. Ang, "humanitarian" sworn to save lives - justifies suicide bombing shira Apr 2015 #73

so you admit that the Lancet published a paper that contradicted the Open Letter to Gaza azurnoir Apr 2015 #67

Open Letter idiocy: 95% of Israeli academics complicit in massacre/war-crimes shira Apr 2015 #82

Open Letter portrays Hamas terrorists as a political party "resisting"... shira Apr 2015 #95

Authors of Open Letter justify Hamas rejecting ceasefire offers... shira Apr 2015 #96

2010: Lancet publishes idiocy blaming occupation for Palestinian men beating their women shira Apr 2015 #97

And the defense of these leftynyc Apr 2015 #117

Well....hate blinds. What else needs to be said? n/t shira Apr 2015 #118