Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
23. The State of Washington disagrees with you
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 10:35 AM
Jun 2013

The links I posted above are from official state sites and define Columbia Generating Station, which is an operating nuclear plant as being located on the Hanford site.

Here's another one from the DOE Hanford website:

http://www.hanford.gov/page.cfm/618BurialGrounds

Two of Hanford’s most challenging remediation projects will be the 618-10 and 618-11 burial grounds. The burial grounds contain wastes that were generated by activities in the 300 Area of the Hanford Site which is just north of the city of Richland. The 300 Area was used for developing and manufacturing reactor fuel and conducting laboratory research during Hanford’s plutonium production mission. Some of the most hazardous wastes on the Hanford Site were disposed of in the 618-10 and 618-11 burial grounds.

As is the case with other burial grounds at Hanford, long before one shovelful of dirt can be removed from the ground, workers must spend time doing research into what was put into the burial ground in the first place. The research is intended to give crews an idea of what kinds of waste they will encounter during cleanup. With wastes as potentially hazardous as the materials in 618-10 and 618-11, crews simply must be prepared to find the unexpected and deal with it safely and appropriately.


Work has already started in the 618-10 Burial Ground which is found about four miles northwest of the 300 Area and only a few hundred yards from Hanford’s main highway. Intrusive and non-intrusive characterization has been completed and remediation of the burial ground began in the spring of 2011.

The 618-11 Burial Ground is located about seven miles from the 300 Area and adjacent to the Columbia Generating Station, the commercial nuclear power plant located on the Hanford Site. Characterization of that burial ground began in the spring of 2011.

I bolded the sentence specifying CGS is on the Hanford site for you.


Parse it all you want, separate who is operating what, but CGS is located on the site and is producing new waste. And all of the waste, the old leaking waste from the former weapons program and the new nuclear waste from the operating nuclear plant is being stored on the Hanford site.

Fully half from russian nukes? RobertEarl Jun 2013 #1
Don't doubt it; believe it - it's TRUE PamW Jun 2013 #9
Hi Pam RobertEarl Jun 2013 #10
Not half of total PamW Jun 2013 #11
So you proved wt was wrong RobertEarl Jun 2013 #16
Not odd at all - different parts of the government PamW Jun 2013 #18
How much $$ do they need? RobertEarl Jun 2013 #19
Answers to questions PamW Jun 2013 #20
What about Columbia Generating Station? That's the operational nuclear plant on the Hanford site. suffragette Jun 2013 #21
What is "Hanford" PamW Jun 2013 #22
The State of Washington disagrees with you suffragette Jun 2013 #23
Reading Comprehension Problem??? PamW Jun 2013 #25
Compared to Pandora's Promise, the Breakthrough Institute and the nuclear industry writ large... kristopher Jun 2013 #2
This is what the corporate media uniformly do cprise Jun 2013 #3
We've shot ourselves in the foot on Iran. wtmusic Jun 2013 #4
There is no inspection regime that is good enough cprise Jun 2013 #5
I guess that's my point wtmusic Jun 2013 #6
This is a nuclear problem cprise Jun 2013 #7
You do know that it's impossible to build a weapon with reactor grade fuel, don't you? wtmusic Jun 2013 #14
"We need...a roadmap for guarding against weapons proliferation" kristopher Jun 2013 #8
100% WRONG as ALWAYS PamW Jun 2013 #12
What a fucking flake. kristopher Jun 2013 #15
Nothing of substance, I note PamW Jun 2013 #17
Ha! oldhippie Jun 2013 #24
They argeed. PamW Jun 2013 #13
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Memo to Fox News: Nuclear...»Reply #23