Environment & Energy

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)

50. Another profound statement

Sun Feb 24, 2013, 07:49 PM

Feb 2013

Pam says: "The area close to the plant is certainly higher in radiation than Denver."

You are on a roll, Pam. First Exelon is better than Tepco, and now this gem. Just a fount of science coming through. Where will it end?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

52 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

TEPCO Rose [View all] Octafish Feb 2013 OP

What "murder of 8 billion people" are you talking about? wtmusic Feb 2013 #1

I imagine that refers to plutonium exposure. Octafish Feb 2013 #2

Sounds like the seabirds are healthy. wtmusic Feb 2013 #3

According to your way of thinking, wtmusic, plutonium must be good for you. Octafish Feb 2013 #4

Is that what passes for logic these days? FBaggins Feb 2013 #8

Fantastic catch! Octafish Feb 2013 #11

What about him/her? FBaggins Feb 2013 #12

Lady Barbara Judge is the subject of the post. Do you have anything to add about her? Octafish Feb 2013 #13

She's the subject of the thread... not the post. FBaggins Feb 2013 #18

Thanks. Very astute observation, FBaggins. Octafish Feb 2013 #29

This is where EDUCATION is needed.. PamW Feb 2013 #34

I like education Thanks Pam RobertEarl Feb 2013 #35

Spontaneous fission. PamW Feb 2013 #36

Turbine steam was in direct contact with the MOX fuel? RobertEarl Feb 2013 #37

Actually... PamW Feb 2013 #40

Tell us what you think of this, Pam RobertEarl Feb 2013 #41

Sure.... PamW Feb 2013 #43

Plutonium Pam RobertEarl Feb 2013 #44

I've looked... PamW Feb 2013 #46

Denying science again, aren't you, Pam? Yep. RobertEarl Feb 2013 #49

I don't doubt the Lithuaninan scientists.. PamW Feb 2013 #51

Bravo. wtmusic Feb 2013 #38

Pam sure made this clear RobertEarl Feb 2013 #39

You need to cool a reactor.. PamW Feb 2013 #42

Wow, Pam. RobertEarl Feb 2013 #45

Again... PamW Feb 2013 #47

Another profound statement RobertEarl Feb 2013 #50

I'm glad you AGREE!! PamW Feb 2013 #48

She's not suggesting they are thinking about re-starting parts of the Dai-ichi plant is she? AtheistCrusader Feb 2013 #5

Her hiring may be a PR move of the first stank rather than as a professional fixer-upper. Octafish Feb 2013 #6

K&R RobertEarl Feb 2013 #7

Nuclear war is crazy. Nuclear weapons are crazy. Nuclear power is crazy. Octafish Feb 2013 #9

There's tons spread around the world WITHOUT the bunkers. PamW Feb 2013 #10

That paper was published in 2002. It's a good bet there's a lot more plutonium now. Octafish Feb 2013 #14

WRONG!!! WRONG!!! WRONG!!! Everything you said was 100% WRONG!!! PamW Feb 2013 #15

Uhhh, Pam? You do know this, right? RobertEarl Feb 2013 #16

I hope she doesn't know it... FBaggins Feb 2013 #19

Hey, ya seen #4 RobertEarl Feb 2013 #20

Another straw man? FBaggins Feb 2013 #21

Building #4 has crumbled RobertEarl Feb 2013 #23

WRONG AGAIN!!! PamW Feb 2013 #25

There are TONS of spent MOX (PLUTONIUM and URANIUM!!!) outside that core in the spent fuel pools. Octafish Feb 2013 #32

Another thread you should review FBaggins Feb 2013 #33

You're kidding, right? FBaggins Feb 2013 #26

Self-righteous anti-nukes. PamW Feb 2013 #28

You'll get a kick out of today's Dilbert FBaggins Feb 2013 #30

I'll have to send this to my colleague.. PamW Feb 2013 #31

YES - volatile materials PamW Feb 2013 #22

Thank you for straightening me out, PamW. Octafish Feb 2013 #17

But you need to be an engineer... PamW Feb 2013 #24

Scientifically - I agree with the TEPCO assessment PamW Feb 2013 #27

Lady Barbara Judge to give David J. Rose Memorial Lecture at MIT PamW Feb 2013 #52