Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Showing Original Post only (View all)

FBaggins

(26,744 posts)
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 02:05 PM Feb 2013

Clear view in unit 3's pool (Fukushima) [View all]

A camera inspection of Fukushima Daiichi 3's used fuel pool has revealed no damage to stored fuel, but a huge amount of concrete sediment on the racks.

Clearing wreckage and emptying the pool is among the top priorities for Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco). Removing the used reactor fuel from all four damaged units to the shared storage pool will considerably reduce the risk presented by the site and mark a major achievement in their decommissioning.

The investigation, carried out from 14-18 February has given the clearest view yet of conditions inside the pool, which was littered with heavy debris by the hydrogen explosion of 13 March 2011. Earlier this month Tepco moved a large truss out of the pool, which had previously lain along almost its entire length, blocking camera access. This operation dislodged the refuelling machine mast, which slipped into the water and came to rest without causing further damage.


looking down onto a fuel rack topped with debris and sediment

http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/RS_Clear_view_in_unit_3s_pool_2202131.html


My guess is that they turned off the SFP pumps for a period of time so that the murky water would clear.

What are the odds that Gundersen will finally admit what the rest of us knew almost two years ago? There was no "prompt critical" explosion from within pool #3.
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
looks as appetizing as the tanked water in LA hotels. ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2013 #1
I understand that the taste was a bit "off". NYC_SKP Feb 2013 #3
Cherenkov blue nt Xipe Totec Feb 2013 #26
Cherenkov? I don't think so. PamW Feb 2013 #29
That would be true if the reactors were active and thus the highest source of radiation Xipe Totec Feb 2013 #30
Two years, right? RobertEarl Feb 2013 #2
Gundersen's theory was disproven as soon as we knew SFP3 held water. FBaggins Feb 2013 #4
So, under the bus with Gunderson is your point eh? Vinnie From Indy Feb 2013 #5
Under the bus? FBaggins Feb 2013 #7
Yes RobertEarl Feb 2013 #6
Sorry... you still haven't gotten any closer to knowing what you're talking about. FBaggins Feb 2013 #8
Duke paid attention to MOX RobertEarl Feb 2013 #9
None of that's true. FBaggins Feb 2013 #10
Yep, Plutonium all over. RobertEarl Feb 2013 #11
Duke wouldn't be processing their plutonium for them FBaggins Feb 2013 #13
You got one thing right. RobertEarl Feb 2013 #15
Nope. Got 'em all right. FBaggins Feb 2013 #16
Nothing about costs too much RobertEarl Feb 2013 #17
WRONG!!! WRONG!!! WRONG!!! PamW Feb 2013 #19
I know. How dare i question the science!! RobertEarl Feb 2013 #22
You have a right to your own opinion.. PamW Feb 2013 #25
If you knew the history, you would know that's what "unable to reach agreement" meant. FBaggins Feb 2013 #21
Nothing about costs yet? RobertEarl Feb 2013 #23
Actually, there was another hydrogen explosion.. PamW Feb 2013 #27
FBaggins is correct!! PamW Feb 2013 #31
Gundersen is a FIRST CLASS IDIOT!!! PamW Feb 2013 #18
Arnie is one great guy RobertEarl Feb 2013 #20
Arnie is an IDIOT!!! PamW Feb 2013 #24
High radiation bars decommissioning of Fukushima plant kristopher Feb 2013 #12
Wrong thread FBaggins Feb 2013 #14
Uh-oh. I think I see a Despair Squid. n/t Ian David Feb 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Clear view in unit 3's po...»Reply #0