Reply #26

In the discussion thread: AGW: a bigger issue than overpopulation? [View all]

Response to NoOneMan (Reply #24)

Tue Jan 22, 2013, 04:23 PM

GliderGuider (15,162 posts)

26. Tool monkeys

Fuck yeah!

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

53 replies	Author	Time	Post
AGW: a bigger issue than overpopulation? [View all]	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	OP
What's AGW?	tama	Jan 2013	#1
Sorry, it's "Anthropogenic Global Warming"	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#2
Urban consumer myopia	tama	Jan 2013	#3
Lots of emotive drama	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#6
Emotive drama?	tama	Jan 2013	#8
Oedipus is not "emotive drama"?	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#9
Nice meal, tummy full, good woman,	tama	Jan 2013	#13
My grumpy friend	tama	Jan 2013	#46
Thank you so much for that.	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#47
Let's not underestimate intellect	tama	Jan 2013	#48
Yes - both/and instead of either/or.	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#49
And courage nt	tama	Jan 2013	#50
Toujours courage, mon vieux! nt	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#53
AGW without a doubt, ...	CRH	Jan 2013	#4
Good point. copare the two scenarios...	Speck Tater	Jan 2013	#17
To me any one issue isn't really bigger or smaller than the next	The2ndWheel	Jan 2013	#5
If not bigger or smaller, how about "more or less urgent"? nt	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#7
Nobody can agree on that either	The2ndWheel	Jan 2013	#10
That's pretty much my take on it.	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#11
Both issues are important, but, ...	CRH	Jan 2013	#12
Perhaps both are mutually correcting in a feedback loop?	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#14
That is the scenario I perceive, ...	CRH	Jan 2013	#15
So it goes... nt	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#16
Or homo sapiens more clever than wise	NoOneMan	Jan 2013	#24
Tool monkeys	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#26
Tool Monkeys fuck yeah! indeed. n/t	CRH	Jan 2013	#34
AGW. But then, I've always held nature & wildlife in higher regard than people. nt	raouldukelives	Jan 2013	#18
Me too.	truebluegreen	Jan 2013	#51
Self organizing systems...	NoOneMan	Jan 2013	#19
Mmmhmm.	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#21
‘Population Bomb’ scientist: ‘Nobody’ has the right to ‘as many children as they want’	Judi Lynn	Jan 2013	#20
I read this, and I'm still a bit in the dark on one thing.	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#22
If no couple had more than two children	wtmusic	Jan 2013	#27
This message was self-deleted by its author	wtmusic	Jan 2013	#29
Actually, I might try and claim that.	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#30
This message was self-deleted by its author	wtmusic	Jan 2013	#32
Nope, no special powers. And I'm just as human and illusion-ridden as the next schmoe.	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#35
This thing is quite the mind fuck, eh?	NoOneMan	Jan 2013	#37
Thank you. Yes, it is.	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#41
I have a question for you on the two child family, ...	CRH	Jan 2013	#36
No, thats not quite right	NoOneMan	Jan 2013	#38
Yeah that is what I am wrestling with, ...	CRH	Jan 2013	#39
There is a finite number of generations alive at any given time.	NoOneMan	Jan 2013	#42
No, two is the right number.	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#43
Ok I guess, but my brain still resists, ...	CRH	Jan 2013	#44
Yes, you got it. Plus...	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#45
I went through this same process on DU a few years ago.	wtmusic	Jan 2013	#52
Your scenario (roughly double the death rate) would still be 'overpopulation'	muriel_volestrangler	Jan 2013	#23
I don't think it "solves" it - and there's one twist to my scenario	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#25
You said "Climate change will fix that (overpopulation)" is your position	muriel_volestrangler	Jan 2013	#33
Oh dear.	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#40
Anthropogenic Climate Change is an overriding priority	OKIsItJustMe	Jan 2013	#28
So stipulated, your Honor.	GliderGuider	Jan 2013	#31

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.