Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
Wed May 23, 2012, 02:25 PM May 2012

'Faster Than We Thought': An Epitaph for Planet Earth [View all]

'Faster Than We Thought': An Epitaph for Planet Earth

Sometime later this Century, a writer will sit down and attempt to document how his or her grandparents’ generation could have all but ignored the greatest disaster humanity has ever faced.

As she pieces together this saga, she’ll encounter the usual suspects.

The army of paid politicians who carried the water of the fossil fuel plutocrats. Economists, who used bizarre abstractions like discounting the future to make it seem like saving the world wasn’t cost-effective. Environmentalists, who were loath to speak the truth because they didn’t want to be accused of spreading “doom and gloom.” The IPCC and their infrequent and out-of-date on date-of-issue reports, an organization that, by design, was intended to slow-walk the science and muddle it with misguided neoclassical economic incantations.

But the one thing that will stand out as she attempts to figure out how our generation allowed the entire world to sleep walk into Armageddon will be the annual cavalcade of research and headlines saying “XXX is happening far faster than predicted.”

Didn't someone around here notice that?
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I wish the Earth well, she'll do better without us. Lionessa May 2012 #1
I've said it many times on DU, the human race is too dumb to survive. nt ladjf May 2012 #4
. XemaSab May 2012 #2
"Look your children in the eye, while you still can" --NNadir phantom power May 2012 #3
For all the crazy stuff that guy wrote, that one line rings true. NT NickB79 May 2012 #8
XXX is happening faster than expected. kristopher May 2012 #5
Table 6.1 really hammers home what a lot of us have felt for a long time here on E/E NickB79 May 2012 #9
And as always it ignores the transportation issue... GliderGuider May 2012 #11
More sour grapes GG? kristopher May 2012 #14
No, just pointing out that as usual GliderGuider May 2012 #16
No one has overlooked anything kristopher May 2012 #17
Look again NickyB, and tell us truly what you see. kristopher May 2012 #13
Funny that you choose to use GW values instead of TWH values in your reply to my point about TWH's NickB79 May 2012 #35
Thank you. That seems a good source. kristopher May 2012 #36
Let's look at the electrical generation from Table 6.1 GliderGuider May 2012 #12
Here's another version using the actual 2009 data instead of their projection GliderGuider May 2012 #15
You're just tossing out nonsense and wrapping it in a graph... kristopher May 2012 #19
Amusing that you were fine with the graph that was based on 1998 WEO. joshcryer May 2012 #20
Are you all right? There is no graph for the 1998 WEO forecast. kristopher May 2012 #23
Are you all right? GG posted the graph he made in #12. joshcryer May 2012 #24
Given that you seem awfully concerned about what sources other people are using... XemaSab May 2012 #25
??? GliderGuider May 2012 #27
I was waiting for your unruly 'children' to go to bed kristopher May 2012 #29
TL; DNR GliderGuider May 2012 #30
Did you flatten the curve deliberately or is it too complicated for you. kristopher May 2012 #31
The renewables curve was an exponential trend line. GliderGuider May 2012 #32
You understated a key data point by 600% to grossly understate the renewable trendline kristopher May 2012 #33
Please try to understand GliderGuider May 2012 #34
Thank you for charting the data, GG. It shows quite nicely that while... joshcryer May 2012 #22
All you've done is illustrate my point kristopher May 2012 #18
Wait, I thought that was nonsense wrapped up into a graph? joshcryer May 2012 #21
At least somebody gets the point... GliderGuider May 2012 #28
These graphs from New Scientist always drove the point home for me. GliderGuider May 2012 #6
Nah ... Nihil May 2012 #26
This time, no lifeboats... even for the RICH. bvar22 May 2012 #7
I'm not that pessimistic, but the old Chinese curse still applies. Odin2005 May 2012 #10
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»'Faster Than We Thought':...»Reply #0