Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)'Faster Than We Thought': An Epitaph for Planet Earth [View all]
'Faster Than We Thought': An Epitaph for Planet Earth
Sometime later this Century, a writer will sit down and attempt to document how his or her grandparents generation could have all but ignored the greatest disaster humanity has ever faced.
As she pieces together this saga, shell encounter the usual suspects.
The army of paid politicians who carried the water of the fossil fuel plutocrats. Economists, who used bizarre abstractions like discounting the future to make it seem like saving the world wasnt cost-effective. Environmentalists, who were loath to speak the truth because they didnt want to be accused of spreading doom and gloom. The IPCC and their infrequent and out-of-date on date-of-issue reports, an organization that, by design, was intended to slow-walk the science and muddle it with misguided neoclassical economic incantations.
But the one thing that will stand out as she attempts to figure out how our generation allowed the entire world to sleep walk into Armageddon will be the annual cavalcade of research and headlines saying XXX is happening far faster than predicted.
Sometime later this Century, a writer will sit down and attempt to document how his or her grandparents generation could have all but ignored the greatest disaster humanity has ever faced.
As she pieces together this saga, shell encounter the usual suspects.
The army of paid politicians who carried the water of the fossil fuel plutocrats. Economists, who used bizarre abstractions like discounting the future to make it seem like saving the world wasnt cost-effective. Environmentalists, who were loath to speak the truth because they didnt want to be accused of spreading doom and gloom. The IPCC and their infrequent and out-of-date on date-of-issue reports, an organization that, by design, was intended to slow-walk the science and muddle it with misguided neoclassical economic incantations.
But the one thing that will stand out as she attempts to figure out how our generation allowed the entire world to sleep walk into Armageddon will be the annual cavalcade of research and headlines saying XXX is happening far faster than predicted.
Didn't someone around here notice that?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
36 replies, 6926 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Table 6.1 really hammers home what a lot of us have felt for a long time here on E/E
NickB79
May 2012
#9
Funny that you choose to use GW values instead of TWH values in your reply to my point about TWH's
NickB79
May 2012
#35
Here's another version using the actual 2009 data instead of their projection
GliderGuider
May 2012
#15
Given that you seem awfully concerned about what sources other people are using...
XemaSab
May 2012
#25
You understated a key data point by 600% to grossly understate the renewable trendline
kristopher
May 2012
#33