Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(33,518 posts)
15. One of the more amusing things I note about the anti-nukes here...
Tue Feb 7, 2017, 09:31 PM
Feb 2017

Last edited Tue Feb 7, 2017, 11:04 PM - Edit history (1)

...is their repeated use of the giggle emoji.

One suspects that they utilize this emoji because they're uniformly inarticulate, because, as is clear from the their rather lockstep nonsense, they rarely, if ever, open a book or read anything worthwhile.

This is why they have the sort of mentality that can make leaps like statements half of the 7 million deaths from air pollution take place from indoor air pollution, therefore the other half do not matter.

Earlier in this thread, in response to another example of the anti-nuke claiming, in complete ignorance that is typical of their type, that the "brains" don't know what to do about Fukushima or Chernobyl, I remarked that a person whose rhetoric drips with mindless drivel that obviates that he has never opened a science book, an engineering text, an engineering paper, or a scientific paper is obviously unqualified to make any rational statement about what engineers and scientists know.

It is reasonable to extend this concept to examining whether anyone who is barely literate is qualified to adjudge what an intellectual is or is not.

Most of the emoji generating giggling idiots here, I've taken the liberty of using the wonderful "ignore" key here at DU. Their stupidity is frankly uninteresting, and I question whether their is anything to be gained by engaging their vast human indifference and immoral selective attention. It's not like the fact that we are well over 400 ppm at Mauna Loa, and will never go below it again has caused them to question anything. They still go on and on with their "by 2050" talk, even though their previous, "by 2000" talk half a century ago was Trumpian in its disconnection with reality. Clearly the majority of them are sheep, and have never had an original thought in their pathetic lives.

But for some of the really, really, really, really stupid ones, well, they're so cute, that they're amusing.

I'm not there yet on using the ignore key on this set of fools with cement between their ears.

Yes, have a nice day tomorrow.


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Fukushima Reactor #2 pres...»Reply #15