Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Showing Original Post only (View all)

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Sun Mar 25, 2012, 05:51 PM Mar 2012

"There is more (weapons grade) material on civilian sites than all weapons stockpiles put together" [View all]

http://www.calgarysun.com/2012/03/23/nuclear-threat-a-clear-and-present-danger

Nuclear threat a clear and present danger
By Jessica Murphy ,Parliamentary Bureau
First posted: Sunday, March 25, 2012 12:00 AM MDT

OTTAWA - Threats of a Cold War nuclear attack sparked by aggression between the Yanks and Ruskies are 20 years behind us. But the world is now wrestling with a different nuclear threat - there's enough highly enriched uranium and separated plutonium lying around to produce more than 100,000 nuclear weapons, and not all of it is properly secured.

So this week, Prime Minister Stephen Harper will join over 50 world leaders and UN, International Atomic Energy Agency and European Union representatives in Seoul, South Korea, for the second Nuclear Security Summit aimed at tackling that very murky threat.

It's not just about securing the stockpiles of weapons in nuclear states - the U.S., U.K., Russia, France, Israel, China, Pakistan and India - against terrorists. It's also about facing and fixing the myriad security gaps in the nuclear power industry at large.

"There is more (weapons grade) material on civilian sites than all weapons stockpiles put together," says Matthew Bunn, a nuclear security expert with Harvard University.

<snip>

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What about DEPLETED URANIUM..... Bennyboy Mar 2012 #1
Yup, just go read about the health problems in Fallujah Iraq today madokie Mar 2012 #2
Fallujah babies: Under a new kind of siege Bennyboy Mar 2012 #4
Man will grow to rue the day that the nuclear genie was let out of the bottle madokie Mar 2012 #5
Bad History, as always... PamW Mar 2012 #12
DU, white phosporous and who can imagine what other nightmares were unleashed in Fallujah. nt Mnemosyne Mar 2012 #6
Where did you get that number? Because it's completely wrong. TheWraith Mar 2012 #10
Good post. The seriousness of the issue is downplayed by too many. kristopher Mar 2012 #3
BALONEY!!! PamW Mar 2012 #13
Oh great RobertEarl Mar 2012 #7
Don't forget that the Earth is part Uranium, part Thorium txlibdem Mar 2012 #8
Not sure what that has to do with the OP kristopher Mar 2012 #9
Can you say Hijack madokie Mar 2012 #11
Weapons grade Uranium... 57,000 pounds of it come out of each coal plant each year txlibdem Mar 2012 #14
Courtesy of Oak Ridge National Laboratory. PamW Mar 2012 #15
Why do you continue to spread what you know is deliberate nuclear industry propaganda? kristopher Mar 2012 #16
False and you know it txlibdem Mar 2012 #17
EXACTLY PamW Mar 2012 #18
You claim "scientific acumen" when you can't read for basic comprehension? kristopher Mar 2012 #19
favorite tactic to lie - data trimming. txlibdem Mar 2012 #21
Your reading skills... kristopher Mar 2012 #22
Ad hominem not accepted txlibdem Mar 2012 #23
Perhaps PITY is in order PamW Mar 2012 #25
I pity those who are gullible enough to be fooled by people like Kris txlibdem Mar 2012 #29
Additionally... PamW Apr 2012 #36
WRONG AS ALWAYS!! PamW Mar 2012 #24
Dishonesty!!! PamW Mar 2012 #26
Wow. There must have been lots of nuclear wars then. NNadir Mar 2012 #20
As far as I can tell, the OP concerns the possibility that significant quantities of HEU struggle4progress Mar 2012 #27
Thank you for the clarification. kristopher Mar 2012 #28
Interview with Matthew Bunn from Harvard's Managing the Atom Project kristopher Mar 2012 #30
Non Sequitur - what does this have to do with nuclear power PamW Apr 2012 #31
It is now a given that you have trouble with reading comprehension kristopher Apr 2012 #32
The other way around... PamW Apr 2012 #33
How long are you going to pretend that enrichment isn't a right of reactor ownership? kristopher Apr 2012 #34
WRONG AS ALWAYS!! PamW Apr 2012 #35
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»"There is more (weap...»Reply #0