Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Wild, Wild, World Roundup February 17-19, 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)5. Anarchism Is Not What You Think It Is -- And There's a Whole Lot We Can Learn from It
http://www.alternet.org/story/154126/anarchism_is_not_what_you_think_it_is_--_and_there%27s_a_whole_lot_we_can_learn_from_it?page=entire
The word anarchism has been so stripped of substance that it has come to be equated with chaos and nihilism. That's not what it means...I am astonished Hollywood has yet to discover Kropotkin. For his life is the stuff of great movies. Born to privilege he spent his life fighting poverty and injustice. A lifelong revolutionary, he was also a world-renowned geographer and zoologist. Indeed, the intersection of politics and science characterized much of his life. His struggles against tyranny resulted in years in Russian and French jails. The first time he was imprisoned in Russia an outcry by many of the worlds best-known scholars led to his release. The second time he engineered a spectacular escape and fled the country. At the end of his life, back in his native Russia, he enthusiastically supported the overthrow of the Tsar but equally strongly condemned Lenins increasingly authoritarian and violent methods.
In the 1920s Roger N. Baldwin summed up Kropotkin this way.
For our purposes Kropotkins most enduring legacy is his work on anarchism, a philosophy of which he was possibly the leading exponent. He came to the view that society was heading in the wrong direction and identifying the right direction using the same scientific method that had led him to shock the geography profession by proving that the existing maps of Asia had the mountains running in the wrong direction.
The precipitating event that led Kropotkin to embrace anarchism was the publication of Charles Darwins Origin of the Species in 1859. While Darwins thesis that we are descended from the apes was highly controversial, his thesis that natural selection involved a survival of the fittest through a violent struggle between and among species was enthusiastically adopted by the 1% of the day to justify every social inequity as an inevitable byproduct of the struggle for existence. Andrew Carnegie insisted that the law of competition is best for the race because it insures the survival of the fittest in every department. We accept and welcome great inequality (and) the concentration of business in the hands of a few. The planet's richest man, John D. Rockefeller, bluntly asserted, "The growth of a large business is merely a survival of the fittest the working out of a law of nature.
In response to a widely distributed essay by Thomas Huxley in The Nineteenth Century, The Struggle for Existence in Human Society, Kropotkin wrote a series of articles for the same magazine that were later published as the book Mutual Aid. He found the view of the social Darwinists contradicted by his own empirical research. After five years examining wildlife in Siberia, Kropotkin wrote, I failed to find although I was eagerly looking for it that bitter struggle for the means of existence which was considered by most Darwinists as the dominant characteristic and the main factory of evolution. Kropotkin honored Darwins insights about natural selection but believed the governing principle of natural selection was cooperation, not competition. The fittest were those who cooperated.
The animal species, in which individual struggle has been reduced to its narrowest limits, and the practice of mutual aid has attained the greatest development, are invariably the most numerous, the most prosperous, and the most open to further progress. The unsociable species, on the contrary, are doomed to decay.
He spent the rest of his life promoting that concept and the theory of social structure known as anarchism. To Americans anarchism is synonymous with a lack of order. But to Kropotkin anarchist societies dont lack order but the order emerges from rules designed by those who feel their impact, rules that encourage humanly scaled production systems and maximize individual freedom and social cohesion. In his article on Anarchy in the 1910 Encyclopedia Britannica Kropotkin defines anarchism as a society without government harmony in such a society being obtained, not by submission to law, or by obedience to any authority, but by free agreements concluded between the various groups, territorial and professional, freely constituted for the sake of production and consumption
MUCH MORE AT LINK
The word anarchism has been so stripped of substance that it has come to be equated with chaos and nihilism. That's not what it means...I am astonished Hollywood has yet to discover Kropotkin. For his life is the stuff of great movies. Born to privilege he spent his life fighting poverty and injustice. A lifelong revolutionary, he was also a world-renowned geographer and zoologist. Indeed, the intersection of politics and science characterized much of his life. His struggles against tyranny resulted in years in Russian and French jails. The first time he was imprisoned in Russia an outcry by many of the worlds best-known scholars led to his release. The second time he engineered a spectacular escape and fled the country. At the end of his life, back in his native Russia, he enthusiastically supported the overthrow of the Tsar but equally strongly condemned Lenins increasingly authoritarian and violent methods.
In the 1920s Roger N. Baldwin summed up Kropotkin this way.
Kropotkin is referred to by scores of people who knew him in all walks of life as "the noblest man" they ever knew. Oscar Wilde called him one of the two really happy men he had ever met
In the anarchist movement he was held in the deepest affection by thousands--"notre Pierre" the French workers called him. Never assuming position of leadership, he nevertheless led by the moral force of his personality and the breadth of his intellect. He combined in extraordinary measure high qualities of character with a fine mind and passionate social feeling. His life made a deep impression on a great range of classes--the whole scientific world, the Russian revolutionary movement, the radical movements of all schools, and in the literary world which cared little or nothing for science or revolution.
For our purposes Kropotkins most enduring legacy is his work on anarchism, a philosophy of which he was possibly the leading exponent. He came to the view that society was heading in the wrong direction and identifying the right direction using the same scientific method that had led him to shock the geography profession by proving that the existing maps of Asia had the mountains running in the wrong direction.
The precipitating event that led Kropotkin to embrace anarchism was the publication of Charles Darwins Origin of the Species in 1859. While Darwins thesis that we are descended from the apes was highly controversial, his thesis that natural selection involved a survival of the fittest through a violent struggle between and among species was enthusiastically adopted by the 1% of the day to justify every social inequity as an inevitable byproduct of the struggle for existence. Andrew Carnegie insisted that the law of competition is best for the race because it insures the survival of the fittest in every department. We accept and welcome great inequality (and) the concentration of business in the hands of a few. The planet's richest man, John D. Rockefeller, bluntly asserted, "The growth of a large business is merely a survival of the fittest the working out of a law of nature.
In response to a widely distributed essay by Thomas Huxley in The Nineteenth Century, The Struggle for Existence in Human Society, Kropotkin wrote a series of articles for the same magazine that were later published as the book Mutual Aid. He found the view of the social Darwinists contradicted by his own empirical research. After five years examining wildlife in Siberia, Kropotkin wrote, I failed to find although I was eagerly looking for it that bitter struggle for the means of existence which was considered by most Darwinists as the dominant characteristic and the main factory of evolution. Kropotkin honored Darwins insights about natural selection but believed the governing principle of natural selection was cooperation, not competition. The fittest were those who cooperated.
The animal species, in which individual struggle has been reduced to its narrowest limits, and the practice of mutual aid has attained the greatest development, are invariably the most numerous, the most prosperous, and the most open to further progress. The unsociable species, on the contrary, are doomed to decay.
He spent the rest of his life promoting that concept and the theory of social structure known as anarchism. To Americans anarchism is synonymous with a lack of order. But to Kropotkin anarchist societies dont lack order but the order emerges from rules designed by those who feel their impact, rules that encourage humanly scaled production systems and maximize individual freedom and social cohesion. In his article on Anarchy in the 1910 Encyclopedia Britannica Kropotkin defines anarchism as a society without government harmony in such a society being obtained, not by submission to law, or by obedience to any authority, but by free agreements concluded between the various groups, territorial and professional, freely constituted for the sake of production and consumption
MUCH MORE AT LINK
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Anarchism Is Not What You Think It Is -- And There's a Whole Lot We Can Learn from It
Demeter
Feb 2012
#5
Why Going 'Back To Normal' Is No Longer An Option for the American Economy -- And Where We're Headed
Demeter
Feb 2012
#15
Runaway Greed Is Destroying America: Should There Be a Lid on How Much Someone Can Make?
Demeter
Feb 2012
#21