Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Thursday, 27 September 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)16. 2 Major Views About Why Romney is Losing, and Why the 2nd is More Convincing By Robert Reich
http://www.nationofchange.org/two-major-views-about-why-romney-losing-and-why-second-more-convincing-1348582886
...There are two major theories about why Romney is dropping in the polls. One is Romney is a lousy candidate, unable to connect with people or make his case. The second is that Americans are finally beginning to see how radical the GOP has become, and are repudiating it.
Many Republicans including some of the right-wingers Ive been debating hold to the first view, for obvious reasons. If Romney fails to make a comeback this week, I expect even more complaints from this crowd about Romneys personal failings, as well as the inadequacies of his campaign staff. But the second explanation strikes me as more compelling. The Republican primaries, and then the Republican convention, have shown America a party far removed from the compassionate conservatism the GOP tried to sell in 2000. Instead, we have a party thats been taken over by Tea Partiers, nativists, social Darwinists, homophobes, right-wing evangelicals, and a few rich people whose only interest is to become even wealthier. These regressives were there in 2000, to be sure. They lurked in the GOP in the 1990s, when Newt Gingrich took over the House. They were there in the 1980s, too, although Ronald Reagans sunny disposition gave them cover. In truth, theyve been part of the GOP for more than half a century but never before have they held so much sway in the party, never before have they called the shots.
The second view about Romneys decline also explains the negative coat-tail effect why so many Republicans around the country in Senate and House races are falling behind. Scott Brown, for example, is well-liked in Massachusetts. But his polls have been dropping in recent weeks because hes had to carry the burden of the publics increasing dislike of the Republican Party. The same is true with regard to Republican senate races in Florida, Virginia, and every other battleground state.
Romneys failing isnt that hes a bad candidate. To the contrary, hes giving this GOP exactly what it wants in a candidate. And thats exactly the problem for Romney as it is for every other Republican candidate because what the GOP wants is not at all what the rest of America wants.
WELL, YES, AND NO. ALL THAT REICH SAYS IS TRUE, BUT PERHAPS THE GREATEST PROBLEM IS THE LOSS OF ANY KIND OF "PUBLIC SERVANT" ATTITUDE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE POLITICAL EQUATION.
TOO MANY PEOPLE HAVE DIVIDED THE COUNTRY INTO "US' AND "THEM", OR AS ONE OF MY EUCHRE PLAYERS CALLS IT: TEAM EVIL.
THAT'S NO WAY TO RUN A COUNTRY, ESPECIALLY NOT A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY.
AND OCCUPY IS OFFERING THE ALTERNATIVE....AN "US" THAT WE CAN BELONG TO, AND A "THEM" THAT NO ONE IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD SUPPORT.
...There are two major theories about why Romney is dropping in the polls. One is Romney is a lousy candidate, unable to connect with people or make his case. The second is that Americans are finally beginning to see how radical the GOP has become, and are repudiating it.
Many Republicans including some of the right-wingers Ive been debating hold to the first view, for obvious reasons. If Romney fails to make a comeback this week, I expect even more complaints from this crowd about Romneys personal failings, as well as the inadequacies of his campaign staff. But the second explanation strikes me as more compelling. The Republican primaries, and then the Republican convention, have shown America a party far removed from the compassionate conservatism the GOP tried to sell in 2000. Instead, we have a party thats been taken over by Tea Partiers, nativists, social Darwinists, homophobes, right-wing evangelicals, and a few rich people whose only interest is to become even wealthier. These regressives were there in 2000, to be sure. They lurked in the GOP in the 1990s, when Newt Gingrich took over the House. They were there in the 1980s, too, although Ronald Reagans sunny disposition gave them cover. In truth, theyve been part of the GOP for more than half a century but never before have they held so much sway in the party, never before have they called the shots.
The second view about Romneys decline also explains the negative coat-tail effect why so many Republicans around the country in Senate and House races are falling behind. Scott Brown, for example, is well-liked in Massachusetts. But his polls have been dropping in recent weeks because hes had to carry the burden of the publics increasing dislike of the Republican Party. The same is true with regard to Republican senate races in Florida, Virginia, and every other battleground state.
Romneys failing isnt that hes a bad candidate. To the contrary, hes giving this GOP exactly what it wants in a candidate. And thats exactly the problem for Romney as it is for every other Republican candidate because what the GOP wants is not at all what the rest of America wants.
WELL, YES, AND NO. ALL THAT REICH SAYS IS TRUE, BUT PERHAPS THE GREATEST PROBLEM IS THE LOSS OF ANY KIND OF "PUBLIC SERVANT" ATTITUDE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE POLITICAL EQUATION.
TOO MANY PEOPLE HAVE DIVIDED THE COUNTRY INTO "US' AND "THEM", OR AS ONE OF MY EUCHRE PLAYERS CALLS IT: TEAM EVIL.
THAT'S NO WAY TO RUN A COUNTRY, ESPECIALLY NOT A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY.
AND OCCUPY IS OFFERING THE ALTERNATIVE....AN "US" THAT WE CAN BELONG TO, AND A "THEM" THAT NO ONE IN THEIR RIGHT MIND WOULD SUPPORT.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
75 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
2 Major Views About Why Romney is Losing, and Why the 2nd is More Convincing By Robert Reich
Demeter
Sep 2012
#16
Saw one of those. I want one that says MUTT, and has dogsagainstromney.com underneath, n/t
jtuck004
Sep 2012
#19
Romnesia: The Ability of the Very Rich to Forget the Context in Which They Made Their Money
Demeter
Sep 2012
#6