Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- Friday, 15 June 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)4. Commentary: Everything you know about economics is wrong By Paul B. Farrell
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/myth-of-perpetual-growth-is-killing-america-2012-06-12?reflink=MW_news_stmp
...Why? Because all economics is based on the absurd Myth of Perpetual Growth. Yes, all theories and business plans based on growth are mythological. Economists are master illusionists who rely on a set of fictions, fantasies and forecasts that emanate from a core magical mantra of Perpetual Growth that goes untested year after year. And yet its used to manipulate the public into a set of policies and decisions that are leading the American and the world economy down a path of unsustainable globalization and GDP growth assumptions that will self-destruct the planet... Yes, economists are addicted to this ideology. Trapped deep in their denial, cant see the problem, or admit it, or if they do, they are unable to stop themselves, see past their own myopic world view. Theyre mercenaries working for capitalists who pay their salaries, and expect them to support the capitalists bizarre Myth of Perpetual Growth.
Worse, the public also bought into the myth. Yes, you believe everything you learned in college about economic theories, all the textbooks, everything you read in the daily press, the government reports, all those Wall Street analysts predictions relying on studies prepared by economists with credentials. But everything you think you know about economics is wrong. Dead wrong. And until economics acknowledge this, the discipline is on a self-destruct path. Why? The science of economics is not science. Yes, it looks scientific with all the fancy math algorithms and computer models that economists use, but all thats just window dressing to make the economist look scientific and rational. Theyre not. Their conclusions are pre-ordained, fabricated, based on their biases, personal ideologies and whatever their employer wants to prove to manipulate consumers, voters or investors to buy what theyre selling.
What do you call an economist with a prediction? Wrong
MORE AT LINK
...Why? Because all economics is based on the absurd Myth of Perpetual Growth. Yes, all theories and business plans based on growth are mythological. Economists are master illusionists who rely on a set of fictions, fantasies and forecasts that emanate from a core magical mantra of Perpetual Growth that goes untested year after year. And yet its used to manipulate the public into a set of policies and decisions that are leading the American and the world economy down a path of unsustainable globalization and GDP growth assumptions that will self-destruct the planet... Yes, economists are addicted to this ideology. Trapped deep in their denial, cant see the problem, or admit it, or if they do, they are unable to stop themselves, see past their own myopic world view. Theyre mercenaries working for capitalists who pay their salaries, and expect them to support the capitalists bizarre Myth of Perpetual Growth.
Worse, the public also bought into the myth. Yes, you believe everything you learned in college about economic theories, all the textbooks, everything you read in the daily press, the government reports, all those Wall Street analysts predictions relying on studies prepared by economists with credentials. But everything you think you know about economics is wrong. Dead wrong. And until economics acknowledge this, the discipline is on a self-destruct path. Why? The science of economics is not science. Yes, it looks scientific with all the fancy math algorithms and computer models that economists use, but all thats just window dressing to make the economist look scientific and rational. Theyre not. Their conclusions are pre-ordained, fabricated, based on their biases, personal ideologies and whatever their employer wants to prove to manipulate consumers, voters or investors to buy what theyre selling.
What do you call an economist with a prediction? Wrong
MORE AT LINK
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
U.S. government to use 'drones the size of GOLF BALLS to spy on AMERICAN citizens'
Demeter
Jun 2012
#18
BP Owes $192 Billion for Gulf Oil Disaster, Not $15 Billion Settlement It's Seeking
Demeter
Jun 2012
#8
Wells Fargo Takes Revenge on Blog for Posting How Bank’s Improper Foreclosure Led to a Suicide
Demeter
Jun 2012
#22
Serious Questions for Jamie Dimon in Occupy the SEC/Alternative Banking Senate Letter
Demeter
Jun 2012
#23