Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Examine Escape Artists and Con Men April 27-29, 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)48. Burden of Proof: Geithner, Obama, and Wall Street’s Unpunished Crimes By Richard (RJ) Eskow
http://www.nationofchange.org/burden-proof-geithner-obama-and-wall-street-s-unpunished-crimes-1335595803
Forgery. Perjury. Investor fraud. Bribery. Money laundering. The body of evidence against individuals at the nations biggest banks is overwhelming. Nothing speaks louder about the banks guilt than this evidence - nothing, that is, except the billions theyve paid to settle the charges.
The Administration reacted indignantly this week to suggestions its still slow-walking its investigation. And then, despite all this evidence, the Treasury Secretary of the United States proclaimed that no laws had been broken. And the White House wonders why its word is no longer enough?
A source in the office of a key figure in the investigation has denied a new story that theyre ruled out criminal prosecutions. But the burden of proof has shifted. Nothing will convince the public now except action. Whether its JPMorgan Chase settling bribery charges in Alabama, Wells Fargo settling charges of laundering drug-cartel money in Mexico, or the nations five largest banks buying their way out of widespread foreclosure fraud and tax evasion, never in history has so much evidence led to so little action. Investigators pinpointed the fraudulent activity of individual accountants in GE Capitals settlement with the SEC, only to be dumbfounded to discover that no criminal indictments were handed down. So it was nothing short of astonishing to hear the Secretary of the Treasury assert yesterday that no crimes were committed by Americas banks, saying that most financial crises are caused by a mix of stupidity and greed and recklessness and risk-taking and hope and adding you can't legislate away stupidity and risk-taking and greed and recklessness.
Thats a straw-man argument, since nobody has suggested outlawing character traits. The Administrations critics are pointing to a mound of evidence implicating bankers in criminal activity and asking the simple question: Where are the prosecutions? Geithner was doubling down on an assertion his boss made last December, when President told 60 Minutes that Some of the most damaging behavior on Wall Street in some cases some of the least ethical behavior on Wall Street wasnt illegal. Deliberately or not, that sent a message to bankers that they could stop worrying about indictments - that is, if they ever had worried. Why would they? Theres been no investigation, no grilling, and no subpoenaing of bank executives emails or phone records. And as far back as 2010, Eric Holder and his Justice Department were trying to pass off long-standing investigations as part of a major assault against financial fraud called Operation Blind Trust. The DoJ's claims were quickly debunked and Blind Trust was shown to be nothing more than a deception which a Bloomberg columnist said used trumped-up numbers. The Columbia Journalism Review summed up their recap of Blind Trust coverage with the headline, "Obama Administrations Financial Fraud Task Force Stunt Misfires."
MORE AT LINK, AND WELL WORTH THE READ FOR INDIGNATION
Forgery. Perjury. Investor fraud. Bribery. Money laundering. The body of evidence against individuals at the nations biggest banks is overwhelming. Nothing speaks louder about the banks guilt than this evidence - nothing, that is, except the billions theyve paid to settle the charges.
The Administration reacted indignantly this week to suggestions its still slow-walking its investigation. And then, despite all this evidence, the Treasury Secretary of the United States proclaimed that no laws had been broken. And the White House wonders why its word is no longer enough?
A source in the office of a key figure in the investigation has denied a new story that theyre ruled out criminal prosecutions. But the burden of proof has shifted. Nothing will convince the public now except action. Whether its JPMorgan Chase settling bribery charges in Alabama, Wells Fargo settling charges of laundering drug-cartel money in Mexico, or the nations five largest banks buying their way out of widespread foreclosure fraud and tax evasion, never in history has so much evidence led to so little action. Investigators pinpointed the fraudulent activity of individual accountants in GE Capitals settlement with the SEC, only to be dumbfounded to discover that no criminal indictments were handed down. So it was nothing short of astonishing to hear the Secretary of the Treasury assert yesterday that no crimes were committed by Americas banks, saying that most financial crises are caused by a mix of stupidity and greed and recklessness and risk-taking and hope and adding you can't legislate away stupidity and risk-taking and greed and recklessness.
Thats a straw-man argument, since nobody has suggested outlawing character traits. The Administrations critics are pointing to a mound of evidence implicating bankers in criminal activity and asking the simple question: Where are the prosecutions? Geithner was doubling down on an assertion his boss made last December, when President told 60 Minutes that Some of the most damaging behavior on Wall Street in some cases some of the least ethical behavior on Wall Street wasnt illegal. Deliberately or not, that sent a message to bankers that they could stop worrying about indictments - that is, if they ever had worried. Why would they? Theres been no investigation, no grilling, and no subpoenaing of bank executives emails or phone records. And as far back as 2010, Eric Holder and his Justice Department were trying to pass off long-standing investigations as part of a major assault against financial fraud called Operation Blind Trust. The DoJ's claims were quickly debunked and Blind Trust was shown to be nothing more than a deception which a Bloomberg columnist said used trumped-up numbers. The Columbia Journalism Review summed up their recap of Blind Trust coverage with the headline, "Obama Administrations Financial Fraud Task Force Stunt Misfires."
MORE AT LINK, AND WELL WORTH THE READ FOR INDIGNATION
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Weekend Economists Examine Escape Artists and Con Men April 27-29, 2012 [View all]
Demeter
Apr 2012
OP
FUKUSHIMA: The ‘Japanese Chernobyl’ - A Year Later and Politics Still ‘Trump’ Safety
Demeter
Apr 2012
#9
GOP’s Death Wish: Why They Can’t Stop Pissing Off Hispanics, Women, and Young People By Robert Reich
Demeter
Apr 2012
#32
Obama to Sign Executive Order to Keep for-Profit Colleges From Defrauding Military Families
Demeter
Apr 2012
#47
Burden of Proof: Geithner, Obama, and Wall Street’s Unpunished Crimes By Richard (RJ) Eskow
Demeter
Apr 2012
#48
The “Likelihood of a Criminal Prosecution” in MF Global Case Has Grown By Charlie Gasparino
Demeter
Apr 2012
#62
Martin D. Weiss: To Make Money In This Bubble-and-Bust World, You MUST Be A Contrarian
Demeter
Apr 2012
#68