Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sissyk

(12,665 posts)
37. Here you go!
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 08:52 PM
Sep 2013

At Fri Sep 13, 2013, 08:40 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

My 1st response contained the word "creep". So would you categorize this statement as "creepy", too?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1114&pid=10049

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

Calling out a Duer not in a debate by linking to an old post, rather than engaging with the person he is having the conversation with is uncalled for, all the more so given the fact he's defending an OP asking about being attracted to underage girls. How can defending that stuff by okay on DU?

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Sep 13, 2013, 08:47 PM, and the Jury voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Wheeeeee! Somebody's pissed at the Men's group. Again. That poster isn't the OP the alerter is upset about, maybe they should 'engage' with the person who posted it instead of Warren D, who as far as I've seen hasn't defended anything. Try harder.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: just calm down everyone....
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Stay out of groups that you don't agree with. This is a bogus alert just to try to get Warren knocked out of it. Not hard to figure out who alerted either. Leave.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

No age limit. None. Aristus Sep 2013 #1
Yeah, me too. Denninmi Sep 2013 #7
how old is the pedophile? Kali Sep 2013 #2
Old enough that you wouldn't be mistaken for her father. In_The_Wind Sep 2013 #3
Let's put it this way: When I was 12, I found 12 year old girls attractive. Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #4
That about sums it up, I guess Doctor_J Sep 2013 #5
Helen Mirren is gorgeous. Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #6
And she seems to have done it naturally Doctor_J Sep 2013 #8
A friend of mine worked as an assistant to her on some movie or tv show.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2013 #10
i would pay handsomely for those lessons Doctor_J Sep 2013 #12
I guess I feel lucky I'm generally attracted to older women ProudToBeBlueInRhody Sep 2013 #9
Consulting the expert lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #11
Post removed Post removed Sep 2013 #13
And yet, Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #14
because it's a creepy fucking OP worthy of an MRA site or 4chan? Derp. bettyellen Sep 2013 #23
My 1st response contained the word "creep". So would you categorize this statement as "creepy", too? Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #24
at 1 am on a Tuesday- the OP was even sicker shit (because it is a real thing) and got few responses bettyellen Sep 2013 #25
zzzzzzzzzzzzz Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #26
it was the OP itself - that no one said "ewww creepy" and ignored the creepiness was the issue. bettyellen Sep 2013 #28
And no one said "ewww creepy" to a post advocating the sexual mutilation of teenage boys, either. Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #29
only one person responded, doubt anyone took the castration remark seriously, and bettyellen Sep 2013 #30
There was no "statement about oogling young girls" in the OP. I gave the OP the benefit of the doubt Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #31
Here you go! Sissyk Sep 2013 #37
Like I said, outrage butter. Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #38
well, this OP didnt pass the "not creepy" part. i mean... how early can one lust over a little girl. seabeyond Sep 2013 #15
Mission accomplished! Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #16
i am so beyond disgusted. and that NONE of you MEN had the guts to just shut it the fuck down.... seabeyond Sep 2013 #17
Like I said, mission accomplished. Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #19
So how do you feel about this post? Do you agree with it? Is it "okay on a progressive board"? Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #18
Do I need to go find the cricket noise now? Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #20
Damn.. that's a long lunch.. opiate69 Sep 2013 #32
You're well on your way to the next step in the process, which is to make up a bunch of egregious Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #21
Pedophilic is pre-adolescent. But it's creepy when she's under 18 if you're more pnwmom Sep 2013 #22
Attractive or sexually attractive? Nobody should lust after a child. Xithras Sep 2013 #27
Yeah, that seems like a decent rule of thumb. Doctor_J Sep 2013 #33
Okay, so since you're here, you should understand that asking that question in ANY form Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #34
Thanks Doctor_J Sep 2013 #35
If you dont self delete, it will be a topic for probably 3+ months. Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»This message was self-del...»Reply #37