Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mog75

(109 posts)
12. jury duty
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:44 PM
Feb 2016

UTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:30 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

I support Bernie Sanders and would love to see him be our nominee...HOWEVER, I will support...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1107&pid=53219

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Not okay to come into a safe haven group and completely disregard their statement of purpose: Discuss the life, career, and accomplishments of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. Supporters only.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Feb 22, 2016, 04:37 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Stating a point of view. I see no violation of ToS here.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If this were an OP I could see hiding it but as a response is it worth discussing. This is something we all need to figure out.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I don't know if the poster realized he was posting in the Hillary group. Regardless, it is a violation of statement of purpose of that group. The Alert is correct, the post should be hidden


Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

In my case, Treant Feb 2016 #1
this is the way I feel as well mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #9
You said it, Treant.. Cha Feb 2016 #44
I avoid, for the most part, GD-P. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 #2
Only Sanders can end this. yallerdawg Feb 2016 #3
I suspect he will continue as long as possible CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #13
I agree with this DesertRat Feb 2016 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Raster Feb 2016 #4
Do you have to do this here? ismnotwasm Feb 2016 #5
You're overlooking the fact... wysi Feb 2016 #10
Perhaps I was lecturing.... CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #16
Hi CajunBlazer! wysi Feb 2016 #21
I'm not that magnanimous CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #27
Hillary is definitely a strong candidate for dems Zing Zing Zingbah Feb 2016 #48
jury duty mog75 Feb 2016 #12
Doesn't mean the jury was right in their decision to allow someone to disrespect the statement of still_one Feb 2016 #15
My apologies. I DID NOT REALIZE i WAS RESPONDING IN THE HILLARY GROUP. Raster Feb 2016 #17
You should delete your post DesertRat Feb 2016 #22
Hmmm... I've seen that excuse use a lot lately CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #31
I DO NOT APPRECIATE YOUR INSINUATION. The post was on the latest page, I saw it, I responded. Raster Feb 2016 #36
Thank you! Many of us add (CLINTON GROUP) to our OP title so we can avoid Lucinda Feb 2016 #52
You are most welcome. Everyone needs their safe space. Raster Feb 2016 #53
I understand. I posed once in the Bernie group to say thank you for a link Lucinda Feb 2016 #54
It is what it is. Thank you again for your comment. Raster Feb 2016 #55
I had that happen in the Bernie Group as well. I got banned. That Front Page is a lure. nolabear Feb 2016 #56
Most welcome, and THANK YOU! Raster Feb 2016 #57
good point mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #6
Results: JTFrog Feb 2016 #7
Amazing, I ask those in the Hillary Group to be kind to Sanders supporters and... CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #24
Lazy alerter. Cha Feb 2016 #45
Right? JTFrog Feb 2016 #62
jury results zappaman Feb 2016 #8
So juror #4 voted to hide by mistake? DesertRat Feb 2016 #14
so much for critical thinking still_one Feb 2016 #20
I was giving him/her the benefit of the doubt DesertRat Feb 2016 #23
I know, and I was being a wise ass. Sorry, my bad still_one Feb 2016 #29
I was just on a jury this morning... wysi Feb 2016 #26
Actually the person involved sent me a private message CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #42
K&R! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #11
I will show respect and courtesy only to those who do likewise. still_one Feb 2016 #19
Well that will leave a lot of folks out CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #25
I suspect you are correct still_one Feb 2016 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author stopbush Feb 2016 #30
hear, hear! n/t SylviaD Feb 2016 #33
I see your point, but.... CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author stopbush Feb 2016 #37
I understand completely and agree CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #38
To be frank, I don't care about how "traumatic" Hillary Clinton's victory is going to be to them n/t SylviaD Feb 2016 #32
whining enid602 Feb 2016 #34
That's not a stage of grief... CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #39
Good post. I have my own theory on Sanders supporters as well... Kang Colby Feb 2016 #40
I'm sorry but I am going to go littlebit Feb 2016 #41
I'm with littlebit Stuckinthebush Feb 2016 #49
Great job!! Eko Feb 2016 #43
Let's put the champagne away - he is still formidable jsmirman Feb 2016 #46
He's not formidable Stuckinthebush Feb 2016 #47
I hope that's the case jsmirman Feb 2016 #60
Nothing will change. They loved Snowden. They adored Julian. They still rec Rand Paul, Ron Paul, ucrdem Feb 2016 #50
More of the sos.. Cha Feb 2016 #65
I will be happy after Super Tuesday is over Gothmog Feb 2016 #51
Kicked and recommended. Firebrand Gary Feb 2016 #58
In 2008 radical noodle Feb 2016 #59
You're right about that CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #64
Very well said. kstewart33 Feb 2016 #61
It's hard, the way I've been treated, but you're right. Chichiri Feb 2016 #63
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»We need to understand the...»Reply #12