Reply #6

In the discussion thread: 12th person granted immunity in Wisconsin John Doe case [View all]

Thu May 10, 2012, 09:23 AM

hue (2,554 posts)

6. Probably both. They accepted/wanted immunity because they broke the law,

but they are a valuable witness and would testify as a part of a deal to get immunity. It's a trade off or bargain; I give the prosecutor the information and they give me immunity (for my part in the corruption).

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

10 replies	Author	Time	Post
12th person granted immunity in Wisconsin John Doe case [View all]	hue	May 2012	OP
I wonder if we'll ever see news like this in the Milw. Urinal/Sentinal??? n/t	hue	May 2012	#1
AKA the "Scott Walker Rah Rah Fishwrap"???	Scuba	May 2012	#2
Here is the link to the J-S	dragonlady	May 2012	#7
I have to admit, I find this a bit of a strange coincidence...	midnight	May 2012	#10
So what did they deal? Will charges be filed before June 5th?	Scuba	May 2012	#3
It's my fondest wish that Walker will be indicted before the recall...	hue	May 2012	#4
Is this person given immunity because they broke the law or because they saw someone else break the	midnight	May 2012	#5
Probably both. They accepted/wanted immunity because they broke the law,	hue	May 2012	#6
hue, thanks for you take on this....	midnight	May 2012	#9
More info (and a little more speculation) here:	mojowork_n	May 2012	#8

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.