Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

California

(78,249 posts)

3. That would be the ad that claims "meat for dog food must be labeled, but not meat for humans"?

Fri Oct 5, 2012, 11:49 PM

Oct 2012

Caca de toro. There is no such thing (yet

) as GMO meat. Dog food would have to be labeled because of its other ingredients, usually corn or rice. Reshoot it again.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No on 37 Forced to Pull TV Ad . . . [View all] Le Taz Hot Oct 2012 OP

I thought there was something bogus about that ad tularetom Oct 2012 #2

ohhhh, THAT ad! SoapBox Oct 2012 #4

Reality check: Anti-Proposition 37 ad is partially misleading Zorro Oct 2012 #5

For what it's worth Iwillnevergiveup Oct 2012 #6