Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: A Revealing In-Person Demonstration Of What 32 Shots In 16 Seconds Means [View all]AndyA
(16,993 posts)30. The correct technical terms don't mean a thing.
Anything that allows a gun to fire that many bullets in that short of time is UNNECESSARY. There is absolutely no reason a person NEEDS something like that unless they're fighting a war.
The fact that people don't know much about them is NOT IMPORTANT. Your point, proven or not, means NOTHING.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A Revealing In-Person Demonstration Of What 32 Shots In 16 Seconds Means [View all]
Playinghardball
Feb 2013
OP
And if he's carrying a bunch of grenades, you need them also. At least the playing field is even.
uppityperson
Feb 2013
#38
No worse than pretending the 2nd Amendment is only about private gun ownership.
baldguy
Feb 2013
#21