Video & Multimedia
In reply to the discussion: Aurora atrocity more important than Syrian slaughter? [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)testified to the UN himself btw. And Libyans had one of the highest living standards in Africa. Now their country is destroyed. We killed, NATO bombs killed more people in Libya than Gadaffi ever did. Children, have you seen the photos, old people, disabled people, who btw, under Gadaffi received so much help from the government, all of which is now gone.
And when NATO secured the oil fields after the murder of Gadaffi, they left the civilians to fend for themselves. Have you seen the photos of the mass slaughters perpetrated by the 'rebels' which apparently NATO had no interest in despite using 'protecting civilians' as their excuse for intervening in a country they had no right to intervene in?
But hey, you want to start wars against tyrants? Why stop with Syria? Do you know who some of our ALLIES are, speaking of tyrants? How about we go to Uzbekistan and remove that brutal dictator eg? But we can't, he's our ally. How about the Sudan, do you care about the people there?
What about the Ivory Coast? Or Bahrain? The world is full of dictators, many supported and kept in power by US money. Why single out Syria?
And who is sending arms to Syria? Do you know?
How come we can't win in Afghanistan 11 years later? Are you prepared to go to war yourself, or would you rather send others to die in these oil wars?
The American people are not interested in fighting other people's wars anymore, and no, we do not fall for the propaganda anymore than we fell for it with Iraq.
Posts like this get Liberals a bad name.