Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: An IT worker writes: 'Emotionally, we are broken' [View all]DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)16. You can tinker around with Capitalism......
....and make it seem fairer. You can even hybridize it into a kind of social/democracy with a Capitalism Cherry on top, but this behavior is inherent in the beast. It's made this way and it is only doing what it is designed to do: ''Make the most profits possible irrespective of anything or anyone else.''
This demonstrates quite clearly that Capitalism has run its course. And so we can expect to see more and more of this. When TPP passes it'll get even worse. And once the Internets and Net Neutrality are dead concepts, we will be theirs for the taking.
- That is, if we don't stop it.
K&R
In most capitalist enterprises, and certainly most major corporations that dominate capitalist economies, the organization of work is highly stratified. At the top are the major shareholders, typically ten to twenty people who own major blocks of shares in the company. Because of that, they have the voting power of all those shares and that gives them the authority under the law to select the board of directors, between fifteen and twenty people.
Together, the major shareholders and the board, thirty to forty people, make all of the decisive decisions in a corporation: What the company will produce, how, where, and, finally, what to do with the profit the enterprise generates. The vast majority of workers in a capitalist enterprise are required to live with the results of all of the decisions that are made by a tiny minority.
Q: Whats the alternative?
A cooperative enterprise is the key alternative to a traditional capitalist enterprise. All the workers, whatever they do inside an enterprise, have to be able to participate in collectively arriving at the decisions about what, how, where to produce, and what to do with the profits in a democratic way. One person, one vote should decide how these things are done.
The reason why were interested in making a transition from the top-down capitalist organization of enterprises to a radically different cooperative or democratic organization is simple: We believe the capitalist organization of production has now finished its period of usefulness in human history. It is now no longer able to deliver the goods.
Its bringing profits and prosperity to a tiny portion of the population, and delivering not the goods but the bads to most people. Jobs are steadily more insecure, unemployment is high and lastingly high, benefits are increasingly being reduced, and the prospects for our children are even worse, as more of them go deeper and deeper in debt to get the degrees that do not provide them with the jobs and incomes to get out of that debt.
The crisis we endure is the product of an economic system whose organization is something we should question, debate, and change.
~Richard Wolff, Professor Emeritus, UMass link
Together, the major shareholders and the board, thirty to forty people, make all of the decisive decisions in a corporation: What the company will produce, how, where, and, finally, what to do with the profit the enterprise generates. The vast majority of workers in a capitalist enterprise are required to live with the results of all of the decisions that are made by a tiny minority.
Q: Whats the alternative?
A cooperative enterprise is the key alternative to a traditional capitalist enterprise. All the workers, whatever they do inside an enterprise, have to be able to participate in collectively arriving at the decisions about what, how, where to produce, and what to do with the profits in a democratic way. One person, one vote should decide how these things are done.
The reason why were interested in making a transition from the top-down capitalist organization of enterprises to a radically different cooperative or democratic organization is simple: We believe the capitalist organization of production has now finished its period of usefulness in human history. It is now no longer able to deliver the goods.
Its bringing profits and prosperity to a tiny portion of the population, and delivering not the goods but the bads to most people. Jobs are steadily more insecure, unemployment is high and lastingly high, benefits are increasingly being reduced, and the prospects for our children are even worse, as more of them go deeper and deeper in debt to get the degrees that do not provide them with the jobs and incomes to get out of that debt.
The crisis we endure is the product of an economic system whose organization is something we should question, debate, and change.
~Richard Wolff, Professor Emeritus, UMass link
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think it's absolutely degrading to make an employee train his "replacement"
whathehell
Apr 2014
#66
The corporations, through their lobbyists, influenced government to change the laws
Xipe Totec
Apr 2014
#80
Not a word about it exchanged with Nance or Harry or relevant committee chairs, either.
merrily
Apr 2014
#23
I should put in my signature line, "The above comments are in no way intended to reflect badly on
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#28
And it doesnt take a rocket scientist to recognized that no one is looking to
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#32
You are giving me way too much credit. If you were being factious or sarcastic
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#48
Now that you mention it, I heard him too. Made no sense to me, especially given the
merrily
Apr 2014
#68
You are absolutely correct & Thomas Jefferson said it long ago.."The merchant has no patriotism"
whathehell
Apr 2014
#70
When you train your own H1-B replacement it's self-evident there is no "skills shortage".
pa28
Apr 2014
#11
Having seen my job go to India twice, this is another reason I cannot support Hillary.
djean111
Apr 2014
#33
The article uses the word outsourcing, but sending jobs to India is offshoring.
merrily
Apr 2014
#47
Let's see. Some are too menial or physically taxing for Americans to want to do.
merrily
Apr 2014
#49
some companies force you to train your replacement if you want severance payment nt
antigop
Apr 2014
#55