Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
16. You can tinker around with Capitalism......
Fri Apr 25, 2014, 06:03 PM
Apr 2014

....and make it seem fairer. You can even hybridize it into a kind of social/democracy with a Capitalism Cherry on top, but this behavior is inherent in the beast. It's made this way and it is only doing what it is designed to do: ''Make the most profits possible irrespective of anything or anyone else.''

This demonstrates quite clearly that Capitalism has run its course. And so we can expect to see more and more of this. When TPP passes it'll get even worse. And once the Internets and Net Neutrality are dead concepts, we will be theirs for the taking.

- That is, if we don't stop it.

K&R


In most capitalist enterprises, and certainly most major corporations that dominate capitalist economies, the organization of work is highly stratified. At the top are the major shareholders, typically ten to twenty people who own major blocks of shares in the company. Because of that, they have the voting power of all those shares and that gives them the authority under the law to select the board of directors, between fifteen and twenty people.

Together, the major shareholders and the board, thirty to forty people, make all of the decisive decisions in a corporation: What the company will produce, how, where, and, finally, what to do with the profit the enterprise generates. The vast majority of workers in a capitalist enterprise are required to live with the results of all of the decisions that are made by a tiny minority.

Q: What’s the alternative?

A cooperative enterprise is the key alternative to a traditional capitalist enterprise. All the workers, whatever they do inside an enterprise, have to be able to participate in collectively arriving at the decisions about what, how, where to produce, and what to do with the profits in a democratic way. One person, one vote should decide how these things are done.

The reason why we’re interested in making a transition from the top-down capitalist organization of enterprises to a radically different cooperative or democratic organization is simple: We believe the capitalist organization of production has now finished its period of usefulness in human history. It is now no longer able to deliver the goods.

It’s bringing profits and prosperity to a tiny portion of the population, and delivering not the goods but the “bads” to most people. Jobs are steadily more insecure, unemployment is high and lastingly high, benefits are increasingly being reduced, and the prospects for our children are even worse, as more of them go deeper and deeper in debt to get the degrees that do not provide them with the jobs and incomes to get out of that debt.

The crisis we endure is the product of an economic system whose organization is something we should question, debate, and change.

~Richard Wolff, Professor Emeritus, UMass link
Been there, done that, have the pink slip. nt Xipe Totec Apr 2014 #1
I'm so sorry. merrily Apr 2014 #18
Don't be, I'm happily back to work now Xipe Totec Apr 2014 #60
Great! Thanks for letting me know. merrily Apr 2014 #61
I think it's absolutely degrading to make an employee train his "replacement" whathehell Apr 2014 #66
Tell me about it. Xipe Totec Apr 2014 #67
What would have happened had you refused? whathehell Apr 2014 #69
Off of being laid off Xipe Totec Apr 2014 #72
I see what you're saying.. whathehell Apr 2014 #73
Yea, it sucks. Xipe Totec Apr 2014 #75
It certainly does...Like you, I don't blame whathehell Apr 2014 #78
The corporations, through their lobbyists, influenced government to change the laws Xipe Totec Apr 2014 #80
Me too, in 2002. Thor_MN Apr 2014 #20
And broken is our congress... ChromeFoundry Apr 2014 #2
Dont you think the Admin should be included? nm rhett o rick Apr 2014 #3
The Admin doesn't set the H1B cap. (nt) jeff47 Apr 2014 #4
But of course. nm rhett o rick Apr 2014 #5
Not a word about it exchanged with Nance or Harry or relevant committee chairs, either. merrily Apr 2014 #23
I should put in my signature line, "The above comments are in no way intended to reflect badly on rhett o rick Apr 2014 #28
"The admin" contains a lot of people in addition to the President. merrily Apr 2014 #30
Sorry but I missed the point. nm rhett o rick Apr 2014 #31
The point is neither you nor I merrily Apr 2014 #35
The Admin is clueless on the impact of the program... ChromeFoundry Apr 2014 #9
Respectfully, how do you know that the Admin is clueless about merrily Apr 2014 #22
And it doesnt take a rocket scientist to recognized that no one is looking to rhett o rick Apr 2014 #32
When Bush said, "These are not jobs Americans want to do," merrily Apr 2014 #37
Do I understand you correctly? Are you an Ayn Rand fan? nm rhett o rick Apr 2014 #45
People at DU are so perceptive. merrily Apr 2014 #46
You are giving me way too much credit. If you were being factious or sarcastic rhett o rick Apr 2014 #48
Oh, my. Did you think I was giving instructions or advice to employers? merrily Apr 2014 #50
I went back to my post. A critical word was missing from the last line. merrily Apr 2014 #51
Yes that is helpful. Thanks for clearing that up. nm rhett o rick Apr 2014 #57
No worries. Got a kick out of the comment when I thought it was merrily Apr 2014 #59
Bill Clinton signed it into law (renewed it) in the late nineties.. whathehell Apr 2014 #65
Now that you mention it, I heard him too. Made no sense to me, especially given the merrily Apr 2014 #68
You are absolutely correct & Thomas Jefferson said it long ago.."The merchant has no patriotism" whathehell Apr 2014 #70
Attributed to Jefferson: merrily Apr 2014 #71
Okay, close enough. whathehell Apr 2014 #74
IBM workers trained their H-IB replacements HockeyMom Apr 2014 #6
training your replacements who are complete nitwits is the worst Skittles Apr 2014 #7
Getting a call at home because your replacement Treant Apr 2014 #12
what kills me is Skittles Apr 2014 #13
Exactly. Treant Apr 2014 #14
from what I can see, they simply lowered the standards Skittles Apr 2014 #64
Mmmmm, how sweet it is! merrily Apr 2014 #17
"anonymous" = Complicity Corruption Inc Apr 2014 #8
"anonymous" also can mean "has something of value to lose". ChromeFoundry Apr 2014 #10
When you train your own H1-B replacement it's self-evident there is no "skills shortage". pa28 Apr 2014 #11
Excellent points. merrily Apr 2014 #24
This story is so true SmittynMo Apr 2014 #15
Sorry for all you've gone through. merrily Apr 2014 #26
You can tinker around with Capitalism...... DeSwiss Apr 2014 #16
Thing is, we're the beast. merrily Apr 2014 #29
And yet..... DeSwiss Apr 2014 #52
Agree merrily Apr 2014 #58
I saw it coming mikeysnot Apr 2014 #19
We got double whammied in a similar vein. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2014 #42
When people that do not understand the medium mikeysnot Apr 2014 #81
It is not the government's fault. We cannot fall into that trap. The Stranger Apr 2014 #21
You can't fall into the trap that government has no responsiblity either. merrily Apr 2014 #39
No argument here about the enablers. The Stranger Apr 2014 #82
People in governments, local, state and federal can choose not to allow merrily Apr 2014 #83
I've been in IT for 17 years shawn703 Apr 2014 #25
I think the trap is that most companies Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2014 #36
Don't rely on your employer for training shawn703 Apr 2014 #53
I used to get very good English speakers when I called Mastercard and Comcast. merrily Apr 2014 #43
and just this month Hillary was calling for an increase in the H-1B limits antigop Apr 2014 #27
Having seen my job go to India twice, this is another reason I cannot support Hillary. djean111 Apr 2014 #33
and don't expect sympathy from the Third Way sycophants nt antigop Apr 2014 #38
Hello, preacher, choir here. merrily Apr 2014 #44
back in 2007 antigop Apr 2014 #40
Nothing that pays nearly as well, that's for sure. djean111 Apr 2014 #41
The article uses the word outsourcing, but sending jobs to India is offshoring. merrily Apr 2014 #47
But upthread I read that the admin has nothing to do with this Doctor_J Apr 2014 #63
If you have to train the H1-B replacements Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2014 #34
Let's see. Some are too menial or physically taxing for Americans to want to do. merrily Apr 2014 #49
Why do IT workers tolerate having to train their replacements? Brigid Apr 2014 #54
some companies force you to train your replacement if you want severance payment nt antigop Apr 2014 #55
Yep, that's what I thought. Brigid Apr 2014 #56
Mission Accomplished for the globalizers/1%. Doctor_J Apr 2014 #62
Sabotaging my replacement would be more like it. Ed Suspicious Apr 2014 #76
Been that way in the private sector for some time now. riqster Apr 2014 #77
No emotions are allowed in the IT Room Blue Owl Apr 2014 #79
The real H-1B numbers ticktockman Apr 2014 #84
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»An IT worker writes: 'Emo...»Reply #16