Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Editorials & Other Articles
In reply to the discussion: New Science Confirms Homophobic Men Have Intense Homosexual Impulses [View all]libodem
(19,288 posts)28. I worked in Adolescent Treatment
Back in the 90's and they used those PPG' on the young male perps, to determine interest in younger kids.
It still seems barbaric and kind of iffy science.
Even gross stuff can be stimulating because it has sexual content, especially for young guys.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
New Science Confirms Homophobic Men Have Intense Homosexual Impulses [View all]
Berlin Expat
Jan 2014
OP
You are confusing application to individuals versus statistical studies
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2014
#32
It may be that the increase in the chart is not statistically significant. i.e. > 0.05
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2014
#41
Yes, we would like a bigger better study. Seems like a fruitful area of research. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2014
#44
I know I posted this study here ears ago. It's from 1996. The full paper is available online.
Jackpine Radical
Jan 2014
#9
Yes, the OP's title "New Science" is deliberately or ignorantly misleading. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2014
#34
Let's hook up Sociology Prof. Mark Regnerus (Univ. of Texas @ Austin) and see how he fares...
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2014
#13
Isn't that why the term uses the suffix "-phobia" rather than the prefix "miso-?"
cyberswede
Jan 2014
#17
Two meanings of "homo": 1) same (uniformity) antonym of hetero; 2) genus of humans. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2014
#64
NEWS ALERT: to be followed by shocking allegations of bears shitting in the woods.
TrollBuster9090
Jan 2014
#30
This explains why I never understood the over the top revulsion especially by jocks.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jan 2014
#31
Nonsense. Gays are not responsible for homophobia. Nothing in the study makes them responsible.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2014
#63
"associated" does not mean "always" or "in everybody". It means there is a correlation. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2014
#67
I can't. As you say, examples are rare & you haven't linked any. You can tell them too. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2014
#69
That does not apply. Also, it was posted yesterday and you haven't done what you want others to do.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2014
#74
No, it's your example. You're attempting to lead from behind with your example.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2014
#86
Study doesn't say that some homophobes being gay makes gays responsible for homophobia.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2014
#89
I already stated that some homophobes are that way because of same-sex feelings.
Behind the Aegis
Jan 2014
#80
Your excerpt is not part of the study you object to. To be clear. So nobody thinks that it is. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jan 2014
#82