Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PDJane

(10,103 posts)
7. Which is all very academic, and I understand the academic viewpoint.
Tue Apr 2, 2013, 02:26 PM
Apr 2013

However, when the concept hits real life, there are far too many instances of 'coerced labour', and slavery is a very fine and blunt name for it.

In fact, when it comes down to it, the 'volunteer army' is a mostly coerced force; they are there because there are very few choices that will get schooling, health care and three squares for the recruit and his family. Thus, the US government comment above.

The academics are fine for blunting the horror of the situation; I would prefer not to do so.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Slavery and Capitalism»Reply #7