Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)

10. A quick peek at the body isn't disrupting evidence.

Reply to madaboutharry (Reply #7)

Thu Jan 3, 2013, 11:13 PM

Jan 2013

And really, it's quite obvious that he was the person responsible. It's not like they were going to put anyone on trial. I don't see it as a big deal.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

State Worker Placed On Leave After Showing Husband Adam Lanza's Body [View all] DonViejo Jan 2013 OP

Paid leave. Nice gig, if you can get it. nt NYC_SKP Jan 2013 #1

Mrs. Henry is an idiot. madaboutharry Jan 2013 #2

I really don't understand people rivegauche Jan 2013 #3

I'm going to take the other side and say "so what?" MrSlayer Jan 2013 #4

Good point - how many saw JFK and Jack Ruby and Oswald? Hestia Jan 2013 #5

OTOH, what if he'd asked to see one of the children? Morbid curiousity doesn't have to be sated. freshwest Jan 2013 #6

The man's body was evidence in a criminal investigation. madaboutharry Jan 2013 #7

apart from any emotional reactions, that deserves the final word. yurbud Jan 2013 #8

Good point. HooptieWagon Jan 2013 #9

A quick peek at the body isn't disrupting evidence. MrSlayer Jan 2013 #10

It's not the position of an random office clerk to make that judgment Ash_F Jan 2013 #13

+ struggle4progress Jan 2013 #14

Bet he took a picture cosmicamerican Jan 2013 #11

Voyeurism taken to a new low imo. Jefferson23 Jan 2013 #12