HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Good Reads (Forum) » Bill Moyers: "NRA tu... » Reply #30
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Response to Atypical Liberal (Reply #8)

Tue Jul 24, 2012, 03:05 PM

30. within the context of a well-regulated state militia

the dissenting opinion is an excellent read.

"But a conclusion that the Second Amendment protects an individual right does not tell us anything about the scope of that right.

Guns are used to hunt, for self-defense, to commit crimes, for sporting activities, and to perform military duties. The Second Amendment plainly does not protect the right to use a gun to rob a bank; it is equally clear that it does encompass the right to use weapons for certain military purposes. Whether it also protects the right to possess and use guns for nonmilitary purposes like hunting and personal self-defense is the question presented by this case. The text of the Amendment, its history, and our decision in United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174 (1939) , provide a clear answer to that question....

....The Second Amendment was adopted to protect the right of the people of each of the several States to maintain a well-regulated militia. It was a response to concerns raised during the ratification of the Constitution that the power of Congress to disarm the state militias and create a national standing army posed an intolerable threat to the sovereignty of the several States. Neither the text of the Amendment nor the arguments advanced by its proponents evidenced the slightest interest in limiting any legislature’s authority to regulate private civilian uses of firearms. Specifically, there is no indication that the Framers of the Amendment intended to enshrine the common-law right of self-defense in the Constitution.

In 1934, Congress enacted the National Firearms Act, the first major federal firearms law.1 Upholding a conviction under that Act, this Court held that, “n the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a ‘shotgun having a barrel of less than eighteen inches in length’ at this time has some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, we cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear such an instrument.” Miller, 307 U. S., at 178. ....

....No new evidence has surfaced since 1980 supporting the view that the Amendment was intended to curtail the power of Congress to regulate civilian use or misuse of weapons. Indeed, a review of the drafting history of the Amendment demonstrates that its Framers rejected proposals that would have broadened its coverage to include such uses.....

....“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State”

The preamble to the Second Amendment makes three important points. It identifies the preservation of the militia as the Amendment’s purpose; it explains that the militia is necessary to the security of a free State; and it recognizes that the militia must be “well regulated.” In all three respects it is comparable to provisions in several State Declarations of Rights that were adopted roughly contemporaneously with the Declaration of Independence.5....

....The parallels between the Second Amendment and these state declarations, and the Second Amendment ’s omission of any statement of purpose related to the right to use firearms for hunting or personal self-defense, is especially striking in light of the fact that the Declarations of Rights of Pennsylvania and Vermont did expressly protect such civilian uses at the time....

....The contrast between those two declarations and the Second Amendment reinforces the clear statement of purpose announced in the Amendment’s preamble. It confirms that the Framers’ single-minded focus in crafting the constitutional guarantee “to keep and bear arms” was on military uses of firearms, which they viewed in the context of service in state militias....

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 43 replies Author Time Post
flamingdem Jul 2012 OP
DrDan Jul 2012 #1
brewens Jul 2012 #2
Hoyt Jul 2012 #4
flamingdem Jul 2012 #5
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #8
brewens Jul 2012 #12
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #15
LineLineLineReply within the context of a well-regulated state militia
magical thyme Jul 2012 #30
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #32
magical thyme Jul 2012 #34
magical thyme Jul 2012 #31
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #33
magical thyme Jul 2012 #35
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #37
russspeakeasy Jul 2012 #3
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #7
iamthebandfanman Jul 2012 #10
russspeakeasy Jul 2012 #16
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #19
russspeakeasy Jul 2012 #20
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #22
Overseas Jul 2012 #6
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #9
Chorophyll Jul 2012 #11
gtar100 Jul 2012 #13
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #14
Fortinbras Armstrong Jul 2012 #17
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #18
Fortinbras Armstrong Jul 2012 #21
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #23
Fortinbras Armstrong Jul 2012 #24
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #25
Fortinbras Armstrong Jul 2012 #27
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #28
Fortinbras Armstrong Jul 2012 #39
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #40
Fortinbras Armstrong Jul 2012 #42
Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #43
MicaelS Jul 2012 #41
DCBob Jul 2012 #38
meanit Jul 2012 #26
Rhiannon12866 Jul 2012 #29
yurbud Jul 2012 #36
Please login to view edit histories.