Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

highoverheadspace

(307 posts)
Mon Mar 21, 2016, 11:47 AM Mar 2016

Hillary Is the Candidate of the War Machine - by Jeffrey Sachs [View all]

Someone posted this in another thread. Just thought I'd share it as it is vitally important people understand this right now. Lives are at stake.

http://www.commondreams.org/views/2016/02/05/hillary-candidate-war-machine

There's no doubt that Hillary is the candidate of Wall Street. Even more dangerous, though, is that she is the candidate of the military-industrial complex. The idea that she is bad on the corporate issues but good on national security has it wrong. Her so-called foreign policy "experience" has been to support every war demanded by the US deep security state run by the military and the CIA.

Hillary and Bill Clinton's close relations with Wall Street helped to stoke two financial bubbles (1999-2000 and 2005-8) and the Great Recession that followed Lehman's collapse. In the 1990s they pushed financial deregulation for their campaign backers that in turn let loose the worst demons of financial manipulation, toxic assets, financial fraud, and eventually collapse. In the process they won elections and got mighty rich.

Yet Hillary's connections with the military-industrial complex are also alarming. It is often believed that the Republicans are the neocons and the Democrats act as restraints on the warmongering. This is not correct. Both parties are divided between neocon hawks and cautious realists who don't want the US in unending war. Hillary is a staunch neocon whose record of favoring American war adventures explains much of our current security danger.

Just as the last Clinton presidency set the stage for financial collapse, it also set the stage for unending war. On October 31, 1998 President Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Act that made it official US policy to support "regime change" in Iraq.

It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.

Thus were laid the foundations for the Iraq War in 2003.

71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary is the peace candidate: She is for the Iran peace deal: The Clinton lewebley3 Mar 2016 #1
lol! Viva_La_Revolution Mar 2016 #3
Hillary history has been in open for all to see she has served her country lewebley3 Mar 2016 #17
Tell that one to the thousands of people killed in Libya. highoverheadspace Mar 2016 #42
That seems to be the problem... nt revbones Mar 2016 #56
We're #1 in arms sales. It takes an AR-15 (TM) to raze a village! Baobab Mar 2016 #59
that seems to happen all the time PatrynXX Mar 2016 #63
Well that's some spin. Cassiopeia Mar 2016 #4
Not spin: The Truth: Sanders people are always spreading propaganda lewebley3 Mar 2016 #24
Hillary gave an impassioned speech on the merits Cassiopeia Mar 2016 #29
Right, but she still voted for the Iraq War. revbones Mar 2016 #57
I'm really shocked at Sachs and am going to Hortensis Mar 2016 #64
Holy Spin Batman! You just went full "War = Peace" on us! Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #7
Still smoking that stuff, I see. zalinda Mar 2016 #9
No, but have not turned into a Sanders ideologue; which it more of problem lewebley3 Mar 2016 #22
Why should you worry, you live in Hillaryland, zalinda Mar 2016 #36
You may want to reread the OP. Just saying... eom Duval Mar 2016 #10
I know Hillary's peace History: She also will keep the American people safe lewebley3 Mar 2016 #20
either you are woefully misinformed noiretextatique Mar 2016 #32
No not misinformed: I have watched Hillary with others American's 30 years lewebley3 Mar 2016 #35
thanks for confirming eom noiretextatique Mar 2016 #38
Please don't tell us you are so uninformed as to believe Hillary is against drone strikes. n/t A Simple Game Mar 2016 #62
Sander is for Drone strikes: A Commander in Chief needed protect the country lewebley3 Mar 2016 #65
Meth is a terrible drug Katashi_itto Mar 2016 #11
You are on the drug of Sanders propaganda lewebley3 Mar 2016 #21
Not even a snappy comeback. Meth is a really terrible drug. Katashi_itto Mar 2016 #50
What about "Math" ? Baobab Mar 2016 #67
Clinton voted to invade Iraq Wibly Mar 2016 #12
Hillary voted for the use of force: Bush chose war: The Clintons made a diffferent lewebley3 Mar 2016 #19
Call it whatever Wibly Mar 2016 #66
Sanders state didnt get attacked : He is a pacifist: He.can not be trusted lewebley3 Mar 2016 #68
Sadly, an all too typical response Wibly Apr 2016 #69
Hillary's never ridden Bills coat tails they are a team like the Democratic party lewebley3 Apr 2016 #70
Please educate yourself jbeck Mar 2016 #23
Hillary voted for the use of force: a power Bill and her had with Irag but lewebley3 Apr 2016 #71
So Why Has Hillary Sided With the Republican War Hawks? gordyfl Mar 2016 #26
Hillary has sided with Obama's peace work: and Iran peace Deal: GOP is against the Deal lewebley3 Mar 2016 #27
The Video Clearly Shows She Sided With Bush gordyfl Mar 2016 #47
Robert Kagan, the founder of the neocon movement--does not endorse "peace candidates." CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #55
Hillary Is the Candidate of the War Machine, lies don't erase. downeastdaniel Mar 2016 #2
A disturbing history, to say the least. davidthegnome Mar 2016 #5
This is why I can't vote for her. It would be immoral. fbc Mar 2016 #6
GOod POint Ferd Berfel Mar 2016 #15
Here's my post on a related column, published yesterday I hate liars Mar 2016 #8
Please stop smearing Democrats here MaggieD Mar 2016 #13
Looking at history, decisions that were made and supported.. peace13 Mar 2016 #16
Yes it is smearing MaggieD Mar 2016 #30
Post a correction noiretextatique Mar 2016 #33
I would spend my entire day doing that MaggieD Mar 2016 #34
provide some facts noiretextatique Mar 2016 #37
I'm supporting Bernie, a real democrat. He's not a wolf in sheep clothing. highoverheadspace Mar 2016 #43
Perspective sublimecabbie Mar 2016 #28
Please stop the repetitive inane posting of that "smear" line. revbones Mar 2016 #58
That is not accurate. Hissyspit Mar 2016 #60
One sided lark Mar 2016 #14
Look carefully. peace13 Mar 2016 #18
Clinton is no saint sublimecabbie Mar 2016 #31
Their actions will totally offend you and millions will die. lark Mar 2016 #39
you've missed my point sublimecabbie Mar 2016 #41
yep, she's great at warmongering offense like her supporters are woefully unable stupidicus Mar 2016 #25
What war did she cause? lark Mar 2016 #40
blindness is blindness regardless of the cause stupidicus Mar 2016 #44
The person that originally responded said that she was a worse warmonger than the Repugs. lark Mar 2016 #45
and warmongering is just ONE thing stupidicus Mar 2016 #46
How dare you use those links here! highoverheadspace Mar 2016 #49
they can be a sad lot stupidicus Mar 2016 #51
Indeed, on a bright note, I now know what life was like in East Germany in the 1970's. highoverheadspace Mar 2016 #52
And today's speech reinforced that fact Doctor_J Mar 2016 #48
Hillary voted for war in Iraq, because she wanted it Kittycat Mar 2016 #53
PNAC cofounder Robert Kagan has endorsed Hillary Clinton RufusTFirefly Mar 2016 #54
I believe lewebly3 and MaggieD have defended Hillary on this as well as she can be defended. Scuba Mar 2016 #61
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Hillary Is the Candidate ...»Reply #0