Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)NY Times Declares Michael Brown To Be 'No Angel' [View all]
Source: HuffPo
Posted: 08/25/2014 10:25 am EDT Updated: 10 minutes ago
The New York Times is drawing criticism for a Monday article about the life of Michael Brown, the unarmed black teenager shot dead by police officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson, Missouri.
The paper's John Eligon wrote a lengthy profile of Brown, touching on the "problems and promise" he faced. Much of the piece could be seen as sympathetic towards him. It was this paragraph, though, that set people off:
Michael Brown, 18, due to be buried on Monday, was no angel, with public records and interviews with friends and family revealing both problems and promise in his young life. Shortly before his encounter with Officer Wilson, the police say he was caught on a security camera stealing a box of cigars, pushing the clerk of a convenience store into a display case. He lived in a community that had rough patches, and he dabbled in drugs and alcohol. He had taken to rapping in recent months, producing lyrics that were by turns contemplative and vulgar. He got into at least one scuffle with a neighbor.
"No angel" struck many as a very jarring descriptor to insert. The reaction was swift: of course Brown was "no angel," because he was a regular human being, but what did that have to do with his death?
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/25/ny-times-michael-brown-no-angel_n_5708619.html?cps=gravity
There's a tweet by Jamil Smith below the article that's spot-on.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
92 replies, 11352 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Propaganda still -it was mentioned on the evening news tonight . I was in a waiting room full
lunasun
Aug 2014
#88
Note to the NYT: I'm not an angel, either, and I'll bet neither is the fellow who wrote that piece
Jack Rabbit
Aug 2014
#10
the NYT article is a picture of Michael Brown as his friends and family remember him
Enrique
Aug 2014
#11
Are only angels deserving of not being summarily executed by police?
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Aug 2014
#26
There's a world's difference between 'no consequences' and 'summary execution'.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Aug 2014
#34
What part of "Dr. Baden says there was {{NO EVIDENCE}} on Brown's body of a struggle", DON'T you
Ecumenist
Aug 2014
#78
I'm standing with you. Realist. Making excuses is what keeps people weak and powerless. n/t
jtuck004
Aug 2014
#45
nobody has turned him into a saint. that's a strawman that dumbfuck conservatives have built..
frylock
Aug 2014
#67
Fuck that asswiping rag! I suppose Wilson is some angel, who dabbles in murdering unarmed kids. nt
valerief
Aug 2014
#57
From Salon: "White privilege: An insidious virus that’s eating America from within"
LloydS of New London
Aug 2014
#62
Of course he was not an angel, He was a living breathing 18 years old person
Half-Century Man
Aug 2014
#82